Talk:Leopard

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Leopard article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months

	Leopard has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result January 25, 2009 Good article nominee Not listed April 4, 2010 Good article nominee Not listed May 10, 2023 Good article nominee Listed Current status: Good article

This  level-4 vital article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Cats Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cats. This project provides a central approach to Cat-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.CatsWikipedia:WikiProject CatsTemplate:WikiProject CatsCats Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. Mammals Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Africa: Botswana Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Botswana (assessed as Low-importance). Asia Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Asia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Asia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject AsiaTemplate:WikiProject AsiaAsia Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

There is a request, submitted by Catfurball (talk), for an audio version of this article to be created. For further information, see WikiProject Spoken Wikipedia. The rationale behind the request is: Important.

}

At the beginning the article states that leopard is extinct, later on it says its vulnerable and leopards are in fact very much alive and exist today Andreasuk22 (talk) 01:04, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Andreasuk22 I had this issue editing prior. There are discrepancies regarding the Sahara Leopards. Cltjames (talk) 01:47, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply] Do y'all mean this statement: Leopards were formerly present across Europe, but became extinct in the region? This is not saying the species went extinct across the world, but only in Europe. - UtherSRG (talk) 03:37, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply] There are several maps showing North Africa as an area where Leopards are extinct, but this is not true as Leopards are still present in the Sahara desert. I had difficulty explaining this before, so we added a text explaining the situation in Morocco, but the maps contradict this statement. Cltjames (talk) 12:03, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See above. 2001:1C01:71C:9900:68F8:45F6:15F3:F867 (talk) 02:53, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. - UtherSRG (talk) 12:08, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Behaviour and ecology section has this sentence - "They produce a number of vocalizations, including growls, snarls and purrs". However, whether Leopards can truly purr is very debatable in my opinion not to mention borderline misleading and most sources I've seen seem to suggest that Leopards cannot truly purr (given that true purrs are normally done by inhaling or both inhaling & exhaling together, and the largest cat capable of that is the Cougar) or that they only produce a purr-like sound when exhaling.

I think this sentence needs to be reworded at some point, with "purrs" either completely removed from mention or at least reworded to what is mentioned in the Lion article's Communication section - "Other sounds produced include puffing, humming, and a soft sound similar to purring". If anyone wants to add on further to this topic, please feel free to do so, many thanks. Broman178 (talk) 19:52, 15 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We do NOT remove sourced content based on an opinion. – BhagyaMani (talk) 04:28, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply] I'm sorry but it is simply untrue to say that its a mere opinion of mine when there are many sources out there which state that Leopard's alongside other Big cats in the Panthera genus cannot truly purr, some of which I'll add here: https://www.discoverwildlife.com/animal-facts/mammals/why-can-only-big-cats-roar https://carnegiemnh.org/cat-chat-101-the-basics-of-domestic-and-wild-vocalizations/ https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/article/why-margarita-can-purr-but-cant-roar https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/Leopard_Diaries/MP2SEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=leopard+cannot+purr&pg=PT23&printsec=frontcover https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Biology_and_Conservation_of_Wild_Fel/f_5QEAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=leopard+cannot+purr&pg=PA103&printsec=frontcover https://www.google.co.uk/books/edition/The_Cat/H3DNDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=leopard+cannot+purr&pg=PA89&printsec=frontcover And I would say that the source currently in this section of the article is wrong (maybe badly researched by the author) - and yes, even some so called reliable sources can be wrong - and while it mentions that Leopards purr, it doesn't really clarify if its a purr by exhaling or if it truly can be considered a purr i.e. there's no further clarification or context to that mention of "purrs". I might also add that the Purr article also mentions that no cats can both purr and roar & that "The "roaring cats" (lion, Panthera leo; tiger, P. tigris; jaguar, P. onca; leopard, P. pardus) have an incompletely ossified hyoid, which, according to this hypothesis, enables them to roar but not to purr. ". So this information definitely should be changed at a later date and the source currently in that section should be changed - I might probably do it myself if I have time. Broman178 (talk) 08:55, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply] By "purring" they may mean prusten. I doubt its the same as purring in domestic cats. LittleJerry (talk) 22:11, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply] I think what needs to be done in that case is a similar rewording of that sentence to probably mention prusten/chuffing instead of purring (with maybe a change of source), or if not, a similar change to the Lion article in order to mention something like "and a soft sound similar to purring". Although I will admit I'm not quite sure about instead mentioning chuffing/prusten because most sources I've seen mention that its a vocalisation for Tigers, Jaguars, Snow Leopards & Clouded Leopards among Big Cats, with no or hardly much mention of Lions and Leopards. Broman178 (talk) 09:02, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply] Update: I think its looking much better now with the change LittleJerry did on 18.6.25, with the mention of purring now removed. Broman178 (talk) 09:07, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

I request to add information about the Sri Lankan leopard's density and specific phenotypic observations to the "Distribution and habitat" section (specifically regarding the Sri Lankan subspecies).

Please add the following text: "Yala National Park in Sri Lanka records one of the highest densities of the Sri Lankan leopard (Panthera pardus kotiya) in the world. The park provides critical data on the subspecies' longevity, exemplified by the dominant male 'Lucas' (documented as one of the oldest in the region), as well as rare sightings of melanistic (black) leopards."

Please support this statement with the following citation: [1] Wickramasooriya (talk) 06:15, 12 December 2025 (UTC) Wickramasooriya (talk) 06:15, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I do not agree to add this: 1. because this website contains lots of advertisement on safari tours; 2. because your text is too specific, and info about the Sri Lankan leopard is more suitable for the respective page on this subspecies. – BhagyaMani (talk) 08:54, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Thank you @BhagyaMani for the feedback. You're absolutely right on both points. I appreciate you taking the time to review this. I understand now that: 1. Yalawildlife.com doesn't meet WP:RS standards as a reliable source 2. This detailed content belongs on the Sri Lankan leopard article, not the general leopard page I'll take a different approach: I'm working on a comprehensive draft for the Yala National Park article in my sandbox, which will include this leopard density data with proper academic citations. Once that article is published with reliable sources, it can be cross-referenced from the Sri Lankan leopard page if appropriate. Would you recommend any specific peer-reviewed journals or government wildlife sources I should prioritize for leopard population data? Thanks again for your guidance. Wickramasooriya (talk) Wickramasooriya (talk) 13:35, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]