User talk:Arnold300

Hello, Arnold300, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.

• Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
• Check out some of these pages:
  • Contributing to Wikipedia
  • Introduction to Wikipedia
  • How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
  • The five pillars of Wikipedia | Cheatsheet of WikiCode

• If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 17:02, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

==References==
{{Reflist}}

Hi Arnold300! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Vaishno Devi several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Vaishno Devi, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Eucalyptusmint (talk) 00:32, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop removing consort name from Mahavidya articles like you did on Tripura Sundari and Chhinnamasta. Also stop vandalising the Ashta Lakshmi article with wrong english and unsourced information. Hbanm (talk) 12:57, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have noticed that you are deliberately removing name of Parvati from various articles and adding your own unsourced POVs in the articles, like you did on korravai article, the source there mentions Parvati and you have removed her name and mentioned Durga instead of her. I have warned you previously to not vandalise the articles by removing or changing the sourced information with your POVs, this is the last warning for you, if you don't stop with your vandalism after this, you will be reported to administrators for further action. Hbanm (talk) 04:15, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Jessicapierce. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Pratyangira have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Jessicapierce (talk) 20:00, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Pratyangira did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Jessicapierce (talk) 20:00, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have observed that you revert the constructive edits without providing the proper reason, like you did on Vaishnav Devi, let me tell you that Wikipedia works on reliable sources and not on beliefs, all the information which was removed was unsourced and you restored it without providing any source which is considered as vandalism, also blaming the ego of editors for their constructive edits is not right. Please provide WP: SECONDARY sources for your claims if you want to restore the removed unsourced information otherwise it would be considered as vandalism. Hbanm (talk) 18:36, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You again vandalised the article Bhavani by removing the sourced information despite my multiple warnings before, from your first edit to the present day, only thing you have done is to vandalise the Shaktism related articles, especially the articles related to goddess Parvati and her forms, also your hobby includes making the pro-Lakshmi edits on various articles, majority of which are unsourced. Let me tell you, if you think that you can vandalise the articles here according to your POV without anyone noticing you, then you are quite mistaken. I recommend you to keep aside your sectarian bias and edit the articles with neutrality by understanding the Wikipedia policies. Hbanm (talk) 13:50, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Arnold300 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. SunloungerFrog (talk) 04:58, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well Well... The Term Celibacy/Kumari "refers to the state of abstaining from marriage and sexual relations." as it's in accordance to English Lexicon, But But the Word "Kaumari" Does Not.

While describing the word Kaumari, Nilakantha Bhattar Ji, In his BhavaDipikaBhasya

6.23.1 Comments

"कुमार्यविप्लुतब्रह्मचर्येजरादिहीनयितिवा' This Means that "Kaumari Refers to the One who Follows AkhandaBrahmaCharya OR it Refers to the One who is Devoid and Beyond from senectitude and ailments" And Evidence for this is the Anna PurnaAshtakam where Bhagavati has been Called as "शङ्करवल्लभा" and simultaneously being "कौमारीनिगमार्थगोचरकरी" So The Word Kaumari Refers to the One who is Free from all sorts of ailments, And Bhagavati Parvati Herself is Bhagavati Shitalaa, RogaVyadhiVivarjitaa ~2025-30939-97 (talk) 11:37, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add } to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]