Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test

Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page.

This is the talk page for discussing Wikipediholism test and anything related to its purposes and tasks.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Department of Fun Bottom‑importance This page is supported by the Department of Fun, which aims to provide Wikipedians with fun so that they stay on Wikipedia and keep on improving articles. If you have any ideas, do not hesitate to post them to the discussion page or access our home page to join the Department of Fun.Department of FunWikipedia:Department of FunTemplate:WikiProject Department of FunDepartment of Fun Bottom This page has been rated as Bottom-importance on the importance scale. WikiFun Police This article is within the scope of the WikiFun Police, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage and quality of fun articles on Wikipedia, including those tagged with } and }. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the Wikipedia talk:WikiFun Police discussion, see a list of open tasks, or submit a request for maintenance or coverage.WikiFun PoliceWikipedia:WikiFun PoliceTemplate:WikiProject FunWikiFun Police

This page was nominated for deletion on April 2, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

This page contains material that is kept because it is considered humorous. Such material is not meant to be taken seriously.

Archives

Archive 1 (2005–2007) Archive 2 (2007–2011) Archive 3 (2011–2017)

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 91 days are automatically archived 1 or more at a time by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 1.

I got a 1.6k, which means I either played a part in creating Wikipedia or are a ghost. I've been on Wikipedia for 3 months, and haven't done anything notable. @LuniZunie got 3.8k IIRC, which seems disproportionate given that we've been actively editing for maybe at most 4 months. It probably also has something to do with the amount of questions, because there are so many that just give +100 or +50 now. I think we should pool all our resources to mathematically rebalance this scoring system, since I'm a vandal and want to waste editor time /s. monkeysmashingkeyboards (talk) 17:55, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Monkeysmashingkeyboards To be fair, I did specifically do stuff to get a higher score. Such as taking the test while in school etc. – LuniZunie ツ(talk) 17:56, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] I should be studying for my finals rn... I'm reviewing AfC drafts instead monkeysmashingkeyboards (talk) 17:58, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] I’ll go through all of it and rebalance Cooldood5555 (let's talk) 23:08, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] I'd advise against it... It's a fool's errand(and there's only one fool here... me) monkeysmashingkeyboards (talk) 23:12, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Why? Cooldood5555 (let's talk) 23:12, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Monkeysmashingkeyboards and @LuniZunie, I believe I have updated it well. Cooldood5555 (let's talk) 00:03, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find the link here anymore. VidanaliK (talk) 17:54, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@VidanaliK I am unsure what happened, but the link to the automatic test test is at https://apersonbot.toolforge.org/wikipediholism-test/. 🌀Hurricane Wind and Fire (talk) (contribs)🔥 03:21, 13 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]