User talk:Viewmont Viking

Hello Viewmont Viking, welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. McDoobAU93 23:30, 10 June 2012

Dear Viewmont Viking, I would like to talk about removing Pola Dwurnik as listed as a child of Edward Dwurnik in his biography. Please explain me the reason for suppressing this information from the article? There is substantiation for Pola Dwurnik’s notability. As per Wikipedia requirements. She does have Wikipedia article at Polish Wikipedia which is enough to state she is notable. As for external sources there is her biography at Galeria Bielska in English:

https://galeriabielska.pl/en/exhibition/pola-dwurnik-meet-the-artist, 

There is also her New York gallery: https://www.harkawik.com/pola-dwurnik. Finally Polish Wikipedia: https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pola_Dwurnik. I can provide more examples if necessary. Euphat (talk) 18:26, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Polish Wikipedia has different guidelines than the English Wikipedia so being notable on one does not automatically make them notable on the other. In addition the policy on names is typically less is more. I don't see how adding her name adds to the article. You also have a COI so you should not be editing the article directly. Please also note, removing the name is not a suppression of information.--VVikingTalkEdits 19:52, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] English Wikipedia says on notability: A topic is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list when it has received significant coverage in reliable sourcesthat are independent of the subject. There are much more reliable sources on Pola Dwurnik than Polish Wikipedia. In this case the fact who the father and daughter is is important at least from art-history perspective. Since both are valued painters exhibited in museums. Euphat (talk) 20:44, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Then create an English Wikipedia article for Pola and submit it for review. If it is approved I will not have a problem including her name. As you do have a COI, once the article is approved you will probably want to add it by an edit request--VVikingTalkEdits 21:59, 2 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you contesting my edits surrounding GITMO 2002-2003? I have factual information. BU2 Seabees (talk) 20:58, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You need a WP:RS--VVikingTalkEdits 20:59, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Numerous other articles give recognition that Seabees built and maintained the camps. BU2 Seabees (talk) 21:04, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Numerous articles give recognition to the Seabees for building the GITMO camps. BU2 Seabees (talk) 21:08, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] @BU2 Seabees: Then you need to cite the sources that were used in those articles. You cannot reference other Wikipedia articles, much less a vague mention of other articles. —C.Fred (talk) 21:12, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Ok, I have other sources online that I will include. Additionally, I have in my possession GITMO base / Seabee articles in a newspaper format, is there a way to include those? BU2 Seabees (talk) 21:41, 3 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

} feels very over the top for a user with 7 edits. I can't see their deleted contribs but it doesn't look like they're a spammer. They have been adding relevant links to pages with }. Not the highest quality of sources, but I don't think it warrants a level 4 warning (which should have been } anyway). Admittedly their sandbox edit was a clear COI (and possibly AI-generated) but I don't see the justification for a spam warning. lp0 on fire () 16:07, 5 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, just letting you know I reported VoiceHealthInstitute at WP:UAA. Aside from the promotional editing, there is a clear username violation. TornadoLGS (talk) 22:02, 8 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Those external links were already in the article. I'm just trying to help. Thanks Vollerhass (talk) 20:16, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I added only information from the sources already in the article. I really don't understand what your problem is. Please explain your reasoning for reverting my edit. Thanks Please read external links guidelines, while you are at it, WP:COI, WP:BRD would also be helpful readings--VVikingTalkEdits 20:26, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply] You are still not explaining your actions. You claim the sources don't say what the claim claims. But you are not explaining what. Moreover, I do not have a conflict of interest with this company. Thanks Vollerhass (talk) 20:28, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

?

The amazon source that was used to say "The company has built up a reputation as a leading independent publisher" did not actually say that it has a reputation of being a leading independent publisher, and the Amazon reference is not a Reliable Soruce to make such a claim if it did say that. I'm glad to hear you do not have a COI with the company. Finally external links will look like this instead of like this Administrators Notice Board, one links directly to the page, and can look like Spam especially when linking to a page that sells the product.--VVikingTalkEdits 20:35, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply] "The company has built up a reputation as a leading independent publisher" has nothing to do with my edit. So why are you reverting my edit?

Hello

I saw that you reverted the change I made to the creator economy. I tried to remain neutral and site sources for the information I was providing. Can I get some clarifications as to why my contribution was reverted and how I can improve contributions in the future?

Thank you! :) Otot556 (talk) 22:58, 8 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Viewmont Viking,

Today you immediately undid two of my revisions on the pages for Stewart and Lynda Resnick.

I have added a section to the Stewart Resnick talk page which I think you might like to address and clear some things up for me.

Thanks,

Talk:Stewart Resnick#:~:text=[unsubscribe]-,IDF Donations should be listed in Philanthropy,-[edit source MSCGWW (talk) 21:51, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]