User talk:TalkTuahLunchly

Username

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "TalkTuahLunchly", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, service, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Foobar Museum of Art". However, you are permitted to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you individually (not your role), such as "Sara Smith at XYZ Company", "Mark at WidgetsUSA", or "FoobarFan87", but not "SEO Manager at XYZ Company".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, service, or website, regardless of your username. Please also read our paid editing policy and our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please request a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, choosing a username that complies with our username policy. Alternatively, you can just create a new account and use that for editing. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. Reason for notice/warning: Username only consists of the name for a podcast ("Talk Tuah") and the name of a company ("Lunchly"). RaschenTechner (talk) 13:34, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Barnstar of Good Humor
For your absolutely AMAZING username.

Cat🐱 (talk) 03:01, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]


Username

[edit]

i absolutely love ur username XD, wish id meet more wikipedians with my humour Cyb3rstarz (talk) 03:55, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. :D TalkTuahLunchly (talk) 03:56, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply] Oh, I see you also like Hatsune Miku. :D TalkTuahLunchly (talk) 04:07, 20 July 2025 (UTC)[reply] How's your day been TalkTuahLunchly (talk) 07:12, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply] It's been fine, hbu? Cyb3rstarz (talk) 07:50, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply] It was ok I guess. TalkTuahLunchly (talk) 09:35, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I had to say this

[edit]

I love your userbox 2600:1009:A121:76B5:4A3E:7EF0:6251:670D (talk) 00:21, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

which userbox? TalkTuahLunchly (talk) 04:22, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

Redirects you have created have been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 20 § Ralsei Smoking a Fat Blunt until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 09:09, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

Redirects you have created have been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 20 § Togore Dreemurr until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 10:35, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Zote the Mighty has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 20 § Zote the Mighty until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 14:32, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Channel DDD has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 22 § Channel DDD until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 13:44, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect A barbershop haircut that costs a quarter has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 22 § A barbershop haircut that costs a quarter until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 13:46, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Starman (Kirby) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 22 § Starman (Kirby) until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 13:56, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect The Original Starwalker has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 22 § The Original Starwalker until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 14:07, 22 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

Redirects you have created have been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 1 § Brazilian Miku and Shiteyanyo until a consensus is reached. Thanks, 1isall (talk | contribs) 23:32, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

Redirects you have created have been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 3 § 3 Kasane Teto redirects until a consensus is reached. Thanks, 1isall (he/him) (talk | contribs) 11:18, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]


The redirect Weegee (meme) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 18 § Weegee (meme) until a consensus is reached. ThomasO1989 (talk) 00:31, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

October 2025

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of ethnic slurs, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 18:02, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Should I buy Wikipedia merch?

[edit]

I wanna buy the EDIT hat! TalkTuahLunchly (talk) 19:25, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'll probably just do it anyways! TalkTuahLunchly (talk) 19:25, 24 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi TalkTuahLunchly. Thank you for your work on DJ Toenail. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

not mentioned in target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:49, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Godzilla (Reiwa) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is just a subset of the disambiguation page. Handled by the main disambiguation page.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bobby Cohn 🍁 (talk) 15:29, 6 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Skipiti Toilet has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 November 13 § Skipiti Toilet until a consensus is reached. Happy Editing -- IAmChaos 21:43, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi TalkTuahLunchly. Thank you for your work on Quirrel (Hollow Knight). Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

this would need to be mentioned in the target article to avoid surprising readers.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:59, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@MPGuy2824: We could maybe create a List of Hollow Knight characters article! there are a lot of characters! TalkTuahLunchly (talk) 04:23, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply] If you find enough references for that article to pass WP:NLIST then sure, go for it. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:25, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply] OK, I just haven't really written an article before! It would be nice if I got some help working on the list! TalkTuahLunchly (talk) 04:43, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply] Help:Your first article seems like the perfect thing for you to read while you are doing this. The "Gathering sources" and "Notability" steps are the most important, in my opinion. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:52, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply] I started the page, but it's just a redirect for now! I will eventually try to make this into an article! TalkTuahLunchly (talk) 04:47, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Quirrel (Hollow Knight) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 November 15 § Quirrel (Hollow Knight) until a consensus is reached. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:17, 15 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you wanna help me work on an article, you're avaible!

[edit]

I just created the page, List of Hollow Knight characters. It's just a redirect for now, but it's eventually gonna be it's own article! You can help if you want! TalkTuahLunchly (talk) 04:50, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I started a draft! Draft:List of Hollow Knight characters TalkTuahLunchly (talk) 05:01, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply] @MPGuy2824 pls acknowledge me TalkTuahLunchly (talk) 05:04, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply] Just added a bunch of ref ideas for the Silksong characters from reliable sources (IGN, Eurogamer, etc), will be enough to add their basic information I think. TheSilksongPikmin (talk | contribs) 14:00, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Thanks! TalkTuahLunchly (talk) 21:43, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

November 2025

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Monty Python and the Holy Grail. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please don't ignore inline notes. They're usually there for good reason. DonIago (talk) 20:28, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2025 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add } to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect TikTok Rizz Party has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 November 18 § TikTok Rizz Party until a consensus is reached. consarn (talck) (contirbuton s) 19:26, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fictional deaths by person has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:Fictional deaths by person has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. SMasonGarrison 16:51, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please review categorization guidelines. It'll help you decide whether a category needs to be made or not. SMasonGarrison 16:53, 22 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Project DIVA movie has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 November 27 § Project DIVA movie until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 20:49, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Thug Shaker

[edit]

Hello, TalkTuahLunchly

I edit here too, under the username 1ctinus and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Thug Shaker, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 1 § Thug Shaker.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|1ctinus}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-1ctinus📝🗨 16:12, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Space movie 1992 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 December 9 § Space movie 1992 until a consensus is reached. aaronneallucas (talk) 00:00, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hornet (Hollow Knight) is now in mainspace!

[edit]

Notifying you since you worked on this one early on. I worked on it a bunch recently; glad she has an article now! TheSilksongPikmin (talk | contribs) 16:02, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

YES! IT'S AN ARTICLE NOW!!!!! :D TalkTuahLunchly (talk) 23:16, 9 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Fictional drummers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 22:20, 10 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I just created another draft!

[edit]

Draft:Dr. Daisuke Serizawa TalkTuahLunchly (talk) 17:58, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category redirects

[edit]

Hi, as noted with the "male characters in video game" category, the category is reserved only for characters with articles to avoid bloat. Cukie Gherkin (talk) 08:37, 14 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm genuinely curious, why doesn't Chris Chan have a Wikipedia page yet?

[edit]

Just curious. TalkTuahLunchly (talk) 02:52, 15 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Because Chris Chan doesn’t have enough independent coverage to justify secondary sources since Chris Chan is famous for being bullied online (cyberbullying) to oblivion than something like having achievements such as winning a Nobel prize or Oscar How come BFDI’s gotten a Wikipedia article after a long time but the same hasn’t applied to Chris Chan yet? Geez ~2026-66328-4 (talk) 18:05, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

[edit]

Just wanted to say thanks on adding the 1965 births category to Ron McNeil's page. :) Dream7392 (talk) 00:19, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome TalkTuahLunchly (talk) 00:44, 16 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I submitted a draft.

[edit]

I submitted a draft for Dr. Daisuke Serizawa, but I feel it's unlikely that it'll become an article, especially because it has very little sources. TalkTuahLunchly (talk) 05:13, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to edit it to improve it! TalkTuahLunchly (talk) 05:15, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dr. Daisuke Serizawa (December 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by PacificDepths was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Based on general notability guidelines, this subject does not meet the bar. The American Scholar is a reliable source, but the coverage is not significant. The other sources are not reliable. See also notability of film characters.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
—🌊PacificDepths (talk) 09:43, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, TalkTuahLunchly! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —🌊PacificDepths (talk) 09:43, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daisuke Serizawa (December 19)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pokelego999 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Nothing seems to have changed much regarding the character's notability since the last decline, though the overall formatting is much better. Sources don't seem to have much reliability, ranging from places like WordPress and Shmoop, and most reliable sources are just summarization of his plot role are broad statements attributed to one source. The Kaiju Connection source seems strong at a glance, but I don't believe it's enough to show this character's notability independent of the 1954 Godzilla film.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 02:18, 19 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I resubmitted my Serizawa draft

[edit]

Hopefully it will be published as an article soon! Third time's the charm! TalkTuahLunchly (talk) 06:14, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

December 2025

[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Godzilla Street. Sundayclose (talk) 18:38, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm genuinely sorry for making that stupid edit. It just hasn't been edited for 3 years. TalkTuahLunchly (talk) 19:37, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] That's the second time you've said you're sorry for adding unsourced content. The first time it was "an accident". Now it's a "stupid edit". No more excuses. The final warning above stands. And by the way, deleting warnings doesn't make them go away. The first thing an admin will check when they come to block you is the history of this talk page. Sundayclose (talk) 22:56, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] I already know it's gonna be over for my account, so here's my final wish if I get banned. I just wish that someone will continue working on my drafts: Draft:Daisuke Serizawa Draft:List of Hollow Knight characters TalkTuahLunchly (talk) 23:25, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] The first block is rarely permanent except for blatant vandalism. Making unsourced edits is not vandalism unless it becomes a chronic pattern. But you have to heed warnings. Sundayclose (talk) 23:33, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] OK, I promise I'll try to be better! 👍 TalkTuahLunchly (talk) 23:42, 30 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] I will make sure to work on the latter (please stop adding unsourced content though...) TheSilksongPikmin (talk | contribs) 22:39, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Team Cherry is likely getting an article!

[edit]

A while back, someone started a draft for the team; it was all AI so it obviously got rejected. I cleaned it up and added plenty of sources, hopefully it gets accepted! I was going to WP:BOLDly move it to mainspace, but I don't want to have another situation like Hollow Knight (franchise), which I thought was decent enough; I was wrong. (That will likely redirect to tc) TheSilksongPikmin (talk | contribs) 22:41, 31 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

YEAH! :D TalkTuahLunchly (talk) 01:33, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daisuke Serizawa (January 2)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Josedimaria was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
hola 07:22, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Hey all, Scott here

[edit]

Hello, TalkTuahLunchly

I edit here too, under the username Aplucas0703 and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I've asked for a discussion about the redirect Hey all, Scott here, created by you. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 3 § Hey all, Scott here.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Aplucas0703}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

aaronneallucas (talk) 21:48, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You're doing it again

[edit]

If you add a category, it must be supported by sourced content in the article (or in the redirected article). That is not the case in this edit about a character breaking the fourth wall. Which part of the the words "reliable source required" do you not understand? I'm not sure whether the problem is (1) lack of competence; (2) complete ignorance of WP:V and WP:RS (that is inexcusable after numerous warnings); (3) willful defiance about following Wikipedia policies, or some combination of those three. In any event, you've reach your limit of assuming good faith. You could be blocked right now. But I'm going to offer you an alternative that I hope you will take advantage of instead of losing your editing privileges. Go to WP:Adopt-a-user/Adoptee's Area and get an experienced mentor help you avoid these pitfalls. If you don't, there's likely a block for you in the near future. Sundayclose (talk) 19:04, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hi TalkTuahLunchly. Thank you for your work on Bart Simpson Testing. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

not mentioned in target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:33, 5 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Eat pant has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 7 § Eat pant until a consensus is reached. Casablanca 🪨(T) 17:04, 7 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Carol Holiday has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 9 § Carol Holiday until a consensus is reached. 🫀 Crash // Organhaver (talk to me, maybe?) 00:44, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Jockington has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 9 § Jockington until a consensus is reached. 🫀 Crash // Organhaver (talk to me, maybe?) 00:46, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Tasque Manager has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 9 § Tasque Manager until a consensus is reached. 🫀 Crash // Organhaver (talk to me, maybe?) 00:47, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Bart Simpson Testing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. –DMartin (talk) 20:30, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Bart Simpson Testing has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 9 § Bart Simpson Testing until a consensus is reached. –DMartin (talk) 21:16, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Moo Moos requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

–DMartin (talk) 23:49, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, the introduction of inappropriate pages, such as Tax the poor, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

–DMartin (talk) 00:09, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on No cost too great requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

–DMartin (talk) 01:04, 10 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chibi Godzilla Raids Again, a link pointing to the disambiguation page was Gabara. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move pages that are subject to a deletion discussion

[edit]

Your move here wasn't helpful at all, especially since the redirect was subject to a deletion discussion. Please do not move a page that has been tagged for deletion, and always make sure to provide a valid reason for performing a move. CycloneYoris talk! 01:23, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Star Wars characters

[edit]

Hey there! I hope you're having a good day. I was wondering if we could discuss the recent changes both of us have been making to Star Wars character pages regarding "First appearance." My approach has been to put the literal first appearance in the infobox—in many cases, the 1976 novelization of Star Wars—and then elaborate in the page's lead, stating that the character "first appeared" in both the novel and the film, because they were very tied together. However, I do not know if there is a WP guideline or policy that says how this should be done. I think it's a little confusing to have both the novel and film under the first appearance header in the infobox, but I see how it could make sense. What are your thoughts? OrdinaryOtter (talk) 06:26, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, I notice you haven't replied yet. I have edited the pages Chewbacca, C-3PO and Darth Vader in a way that I think makes it clear that the 1976 novel was technically the first appearance, but since it is tied to the film, the 1977 film is also kind of the first appearance. Like I mentioned above, I put the novel in the infobox and mentioned both in the lead. Please let me know if this formatting is acceptable to you, and I hope you're having a good day. OrdinaryOtter (talk) 03:52, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Just founded the Uncreative Uncommons

[edit]

User:Uncreative Uncommons TalkTuahLunchly (talk) 00:04, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, are you... allowed to do that? Maybe take a look at WP:LEGITSOCK. 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 02:35, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply] bro started an organization on wikipedia 😭 KrispyBlueJays (talk) 04:44, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply] Wanna join? TalkTuahLunchly (talk) 04:56, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply] Most gracious TalkTuahLunchly, I am profoundly sensible of the honor your offer implies, and I am beholden to you for your consideration. Yet, I must humbly crave your pardon, for I cannot, in good conscience, accept. It is with a heavy heart that I pray you to excuse my declination, as duty or circumstance forbids it. I remain, with profound respect, your most humble and obedient servant. KrispyBlueJays (talk) 21:04, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Archives???

[edit]

Dude your talk page is ridiculously long, I would've thought by now you'd have an archive. I've seen people with talk pages half the side with 2 or 3 archives.

Just a lil' reccomendation FranticSpud (talk) 18:59, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ok TalkTuahLunchly (talk) 21:10, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply] By the way, it's much better to archive rather than just remove information. When you archive the talk page, others can easily search the archives. When you delete information, it's much harder for others to search what has already been communicated to you. For information on setting up an archive, see H:ARC. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 21:58, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply] Will someone eventually do it for me? TalkTuahLunchly (talk) 22:51, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply] No. 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 00:49, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply] No one will do it for you unless you ask. Would you like me to set up auto-archive for you? Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:51, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply] I'm a good FRIEND I can help you if needed @TalkTuahLunchly. It seems like you want an archive for the page, and if you want me or someone else to do it, please hmu, or you can hit up Significa to help you archive your talk page. I wanna talk more stuff on your talk page, but this talk page may potentially be longer than the Bible 😭 KrispyBlueJays (talk) 04:16, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply] YOUR TALK PAGE IS TOO TUTU LONG 🎃 KrispyBlueJays (talk) 05:24, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Created a maintenance category: Deltarune Drafts

[edit]

Hi there my homie, I just created a category and listed our Deltarune drafts on Category:Deltarune drafts since apparently Category:Draft articles on video games can be a maintenance category for video game related drafts so not only I can keep things/drafts organized but also I hope someone out there can work/or contribute on our listed drafts with the additional attached listed categories for our drafts haha KrispyBlueJays (talk) 23:24, 31 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, I never even knew that was a type of category! So interesting. 🫀 Crash // Organhaver ( it / he | talk to me, maybe? ) 03:32, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply] Nothing is more satisfying than discovering new information that I never knew of, even after all these years🥹, like just recently, the friend I was talking to didn't know December Holiday is actually referred to "Dess" as her nickname when I said her full name haha. Curiosity didn't kill the cat!!! KrispyBlueJays (talk) 04:08, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Shayy has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 February 3 § Shayy until a consensus is reached. KrispyBlueJays (talk) 00:08, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Akita Neru has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 February 5 § Akita Neru until a consensus is reached. Chess enjoyer (talk) 03:11, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

Redirects you have created have been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 February 5 § Italian brainrot round 4 until a consensus is reached. HurricaneZetaC 17:14, 5 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Biollante (February 9)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pokelego999 was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
See WP:Articles for deletion/Biollante. This article is not improved from the state the article was in when nominated, and is not currently meeting notability guidelines.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 00:08, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello world

[edit]

Why did you wanna create a wikipedia account in the first place? ~2026-89933-5 (talk) 13:31, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Because I felt like doing so TalkTuahLunchly (talk) 17:55, 9 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable non-free use File:Scott Cawthon Game Theory.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Scott Cawthon Game Theory.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text } below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 05:39, 12 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This article is sourced from Wikipedia. Content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License.