User talk:QWisps

Hi QWisps! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! GalacticVelocity08 (talk) 16:34, 3 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Case of WP:TOOSOON, requires significant coverage about the race in multiple independent secondary sources. The Forumla 1 website is a primary source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2025 Austrian Grand Prix and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:16, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, QWisps! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 06:16, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The template "sports links" should not be used in tennis articles. There are far too many issues with what it includes and it has never been approved by Wikiproject Tennis. Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:24, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In an infobox, the current ranking is the date the player achieved that current ranking. It is not the last ranking date. Please keep that in mind when you adjust infobox rankings. A player like Jannik Sinner's current ranking date is "10 June 2024." Thanks. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:14, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Australian Touring Car Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Will Brown.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've noticed you're a tennis and formula one editor, if you would like too there is a small discord server for Formula One editing, which contains a good amount of the F1 Wikipedia community BurningBlaze05 (talk) 20:29, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Triple Eight Race Engineering, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ford.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2025 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 1 December 2025. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2025 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add } to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2026!

Hello QWisps, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2026. Happy editing, Abishe (talk) 11:20, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding } to other user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 11:20, 25 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello QWisps, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, List of Women's Big Bash League centuries, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Women's Big Bash League centuries.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vestrian24Bio}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vestrian24Bio 03:19, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]