User talk:Not stuart60

Welcome!

Hello, Not stuart60, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Sohom (talk) 03:22, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Sable232. I noticed that you recently removed content from Power-to-weight ratio without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --Sable232 (talk) 16:25, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

♠PMC♠ (talk) 00:03, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here are some lamingtons to welcome you to WikiProject Australia!

G'day Not stuart60, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; they have helped improve Wikipedia and made it more informative. I hope you enjoy using Wikipedia and decide to make additional contributions.

As a contributor to Australian articles, you may like to connect with other Australian Wikipedians through the Australian Wikipedians' notice board and take a look at the activities in WikiProject Australia and associated sub-projects. Wikimedia Australia, your local chapter, organises editor training workshops, meetups and other events. If you would like to know more, email [email protected].

If you are living in Australia and want to subscribe to location-based notices, you can add location userboxes to your user page.

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you have any questions, please see Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, try the Wikipedia:Help desk, or ask me on my talk page. Or you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Some other resources to help new Wikipedians include:

How to edit a page Editing tutorial Picture tutorial How to write a great article Article titles Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Thank you for signing up! SnowyRiver28 (talk) 09:31, 13 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page GMC concept vehicles (2000–2019), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:49, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Foton Tunland Yutu when you modified the page, you introduced conversion errors. The } template can be complex and I encourage you to read it's documentation but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you always use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 06:21, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop doing article assessments. Assessing articles like this and this as stubs shows that you clearly are not familiar enough with the assessment system to do it with any semblance of accuracy. If you don't know what you're doing, please leave the parameters blank instead of mis-assessing articles. Thank you. --Sable232 (talk) 15:34, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Volkswagen Amarok, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 20:39, 18 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you have been paired at good article review circles to review General Motors EV1. At the same time, another user will be reviewing the article you nominated. Please wait 24 hours or until all users have accepted their nomination before starting your review in case a user in your circle decides to decline their invite.

To accept or decline this invitation to review the article, visit WT:GARC#Circle #57.

Z E T AC 01:54, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Holden Special Vehicles Senator is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Launchballer -- Launchballer (talk) 16:24, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Holden Special Vehicles Senator has failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Launchballer -- Launchballer (talk) 07:03, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 — Amakuru (talk) 00:03, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the template for Latin NCAP still lacks the parameters I added to Global. I only know the full block history for Bharat, Global, and Latin. Trigenibinion (talk) 23:12, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Not stuart60 (talk) 23:22, 2 January 2026 (UTC)[reply] I added the basic version rule to the Global template. The Rating template still lacks 4 star colors (look in Spanish, there's already green and blue). Trigenibinion (talk) 00:46, 3 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I have asked you several times now: Please read WP:BRD and stop just reinstating your edits at Holden Commodore (VB).  Mr.choppers | ✎  03:44, 12 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Not stuart60,

Thank you for creating Holden City Road Plant.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for this article. It would be great to reference any coverage from GMH histories - I was not able to find any with a brief look.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Triptothecottage}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Triptothecottage (talk) 23:13, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You have now removed cited sources, such as the Norm Darwin book at VH Commodore for no reason. Why delete that the SS arrived in September 1982? You have also introduced direct errors, like suggesting that the Commodore was only sold as a Royale in NZ - completely wrong, the Royale was an addition to the regular lineup. Again, BE CAREFUL. Slow down. Why do you feel the need to delete everything you come across? Often as not, your rewording introduces errors - if you do not know about a topic, be very careful about the changes you make. Are you using AI? A lot of your changes have an LLM vibe to them; they look reasonable at a glance but as I look at them closely they start becoming quite problematic.  Mr.choppers | ✎  04:21, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I replaced them while rewriting the section, I didn't have access to the source so didn't want to misinterpret it. The Royale one was a mistake. I don't delete everything? I rewrite sections and sometimes remove claims that seem like WP:OR to me, and I normally spend a couple days on these large edits. No I do not use LLMs I refuse to do so, what part of my edits would make you say that? and what parts are problematic? Not stuart60 (talk) 06:03, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply] You have now removed cited sources, such as the Norm Darwin book at VH Commodore for no reason. Why delete that the SS arrived in September 1982? I guess I have to keep track of your other edits, it's just hard to sift the good from the bad.  Mr.choppers | ✎  06:19, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply] I rewrote the models section with sources I had access to, I didn't have access to the Norm Darwin book and the source said the same thing except the month. What do you mean keep track of my edits and sifting the good and bad ones? Not stuart60 (talk) 06:40, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply] Things like that - someone went and got the book, looked up the information, referenced it and wrote it in. And then you came along and deleted the reference and the month. It's small, but you are causing harm and for no reason. If something is cited, it's cited. There is no need for you to delete it just because you don't happen to have access to the book. I have been trying not to revert your edits wholesale as per WP:REVONLY, but you tend to bundle disruptive edits with useful work - discovering and undoing the minor, thoughtless damage you cause takes a long time and the fact that you don't recognize that what you are doing is wrong is worrisome.  Mr.choppers | ✎  15:53, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply] It was an accident, and I did not intentionally remove the month, I was rewriting the section. I did split my edits into smaller bits multiple times and you still reverted every single edit, why would I do more work of separating them for you to revert all of it anyway. I'm not doing any of this intentionally, you're dramatising what I'm doing, it was a minor mistake. You mindlessly reverting my edits has really demotivated me from editing. You're being overly aggressive and through large accusations around willy-nilly. By following my contributions page you have actually reverted positive changes, most recently the English template on Ford Ranger (T6). Not stuart60 (talk) 21:34, 1 February 2026 (UTC)[reply] No, in the same batch of edits you also made it seem like NZ only received the Commodore Royale, which is completely off base. That's just an example, I don't really feel the need to list everything, because I am trying not to hammer away at you - but when someone points out a mistake, either fix it or apologize instead of getting defensive. All I am asking is that you SLOW DOWN.  Mr.choppers | ✎  02:33, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply] I do apologize for the the bad wording. Also, I'm open for better collaboration with you, I feel like we're both angry with each-other for no good reason. Not stuart60 (talk) 02:43, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Your good article nomination of the article Holden Commodore (VF) has failed. See the review page for more information. If or when the reviewer's feedback has been addressed, you may nominate the article again. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of A.Cython -- A.Cython (talk) 01:37, 13 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to JAC T9 Ute when you modified the page, you introduced conversion errors. The } template can be complex and I encourage you to read its documentation but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it and when conversion errors are present they will show up in red. It is strongly recommended that you always use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 06:21, 22 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]