User talk:MeloMaster

An article you recently created, Shine on Me, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 08:57, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Got it.... MeloMaster (talk) 09:41, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to change the title of a page by cutting its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. ~2025-31245-28 (talk) 21:36, 9 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm D.18th. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to The Art of Sarah seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ꕥ 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 ꕥ →𝙼𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚐𝚎 𝚖𝚎← 07:30, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Paper9oll. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to King the Land have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:10, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MeloMaster! I noticed that you recently made an edit and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, "minor edit" refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. ꕥ 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 ꕥ →𝙼𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚐𝚎 𝚖𝚎← 07:03, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Love Stuck requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Steppeherder (talk) 13:11, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Men of the Harem has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 19 § Men of the Harem until a consensus is reached. 𝙰𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚊(talk) 07:30, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

𝙰𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚊(talk) 07:34, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

𝙰𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚊(talk) 07:36, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Nine to Six requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

Squawk7700 (talk) 08:48, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Law of Lines requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

Squawk7700 (talk) 08:51, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've removed some of your contents on Draft:Human X Gumiho. In the future, please refrain from adding many sources that already exist for it, per WP:REFBOMB. Anyway, thanks for your contribution! 𝙰𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚊(talk) 22:46, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Lim Hyeon-wook. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because the subject currently does not meet the WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE criteria with lack of significant coverage from secondary reliable sources that are independent of the subject apart from passing mentions. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:17, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Jang Young-woo. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because the subject currently does not meet the WP:GNG and WP:CREATIVE criteria with lack of significant coverage from secondary reliable sources that are independent of the subject apart from passing mentions. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 13:18, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Coupang Play added a link pointing to Nate List of programs broadcast by tvN (South Korean TV channel) added a link pointing to Nate

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Could u please before create a draft for upcoming kdrama, check if it's already exist. Sometime the page already exist under different title. 𝙰𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚊(talk) 22:35, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

And please don't removed tag without any improvement. More of unreliable sources you added, soon it will be on AfD or move to draftspace. 𝙰𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚊(talk) 22:35, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply] And again.. HanCinema isn't a better source, but it's commonly used as an external link. 𝙰𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚊(talk) 22:44, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply] I sincerely apologize for the mistakes. I will ensure I don't remove tags without improvements and will only focus on creating quality pages moving forward. I'll also double-check for existing titles before drafting. Thanks for the correction. MeloMaster (talk) 03:28, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply] To be simple, please stop creating a redirect without providing any reliable sources. You keep adding a source that's not confirmed and unreliable. 𝙰𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚊(talk) 22:45, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply] Okay.... MeloMaster (talk) 13:38, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I really also want to create an article for kdrama but you redirect it all.. as u can see my contribution is all about kdrama. 𝙰𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚊(talk) 00:33, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

im not force but pls consider 𝙰𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚊(talk) 00:40, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply] Im sorry MeloMaster, im gonna take a rest for three days. 𝙰𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚊(talk) 00:49, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply] Please forgive me for my stupid behaviour. 𝙰𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚊(talk) 00:49, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply] In the future, i'll try to help you expand kdrama on draft that you created that im interested in:) 𝙰𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚊(talk) 00:51, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply] I'll learn from my mistake:) 𝙰𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚊(talk) 00:59, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply] Hi Aidillia, Please don't worry—you haven't hurt my feelings at all, and there is nothing to forgive! As a new editor, I’ve just been trying to help out where I can. I noticed that most dramas are already picked up by other editors, so I only created a few articles for the ones that were left over or hadn't been started yet. Since I am a new editor, I know I still have a lot to learn and I look forward to learning more from you. MeloMaster (talk) 06:23, 23 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Manager Kim. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and and fails the criterias of WP:TVSERIES. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ꕥ 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 ꕥ →𝙼𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚐𝚎 𝚖𝚎← 19:39, 25 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@MeloMaster Hello, regarding this TV series, I've actually been working and polishing on a version of this in my userspace since the start of the year at User:D.18th/Mr. Kim (TV series). I'd appreciate it if you'd take a look at mine before continuing with your draft so we don't create extra work for the admins and avoid duplicating an article. ꕥ 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 ꕥ →𝙼𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚐𝚎 𝚖𝚎← 11:26, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply] Hi D.18th, thanks for the heads-up! Your draft is much better and more detailed than mine. Please go ahead and move yours to the mainspace. I'll stop working on my draft to avoid any double work. Thanks! MeloMaster (talk) 13:04, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply] As much as I want to move it to mainspace, the draft hasn't meet the guidelines of WP:TVSERIES so I still keeping it there. Thanks for understanding and happy editing. ꕥ 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 ꕥ →𝙼𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚐𝚎 𝚖𝚎← 13:11, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, can you please update for the progress for 2025 modern romance TV series "The Best Thing"? Since some of the support and guest roles are already in MyDramaList; but, the question is those characters are included on its list if reliable source exist. Thanks a lot of patience. Icarus 🔭 • 📖 • ✎ 14:33, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Icarus, thanks for the heads-up! I have added the full cast and improved the article a bit. It still needs some work, but I will continue to further improve it in the future. MeloMaster (talk) 15:16, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply] And also, please update the majorally progress for "Love Scenery" and "Red-Moon Pact" (the first sequel of Fox-Spirit Matchmaker)? Icarus 🔭 • 📖 • ✎ 05:18, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I actually plan to create the mainspace page for Draft:Doctor Shin when it's notable enough, but you've redirected and created it later, even though a draft already exists with the same subject. You could just expand on the draft I created earlier. For now, it would likely be a redirect because it's too soon, and the release date you provided, "March 2026," isn't in the source either. The easiest way would be for you to either redirect the page yourself or delete it as an author, so the draft can be moved there without merging issues in the future. Hope you can consider it! I really like your editing on kdrama, but some of it still needs improvement. 𝙰𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚊(talk) 22:23, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

If there's anything you'd like me to help with, don't hesitate to contact me :) 𝙰𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚊(talk) 22:39, 26 January 2026 (UTC)[reply] Please note this again as explain by Ivanvector: Redirects are generally not considered licensable content, and if another editor wants to write a draft on that topic and then move it over the redirect, that's allowed. 𝙰𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚊(talk) 01:18, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply] To clarify, when I created the redirect, your draft didn't exist yet. When I later wrote the article, there was no notice that a draft existed. If you have a draft, you should use a template in the mainspace to notify others; since you didn't specify it, I had no way of knowing. If you still want to merge, go ahead, but this sets a precedent. You wouldn't want someone creating a draft after your mainspace page just to overwrite your work. Than I'll follow this same approach in the future, so please don't dispute it if the situation is reversed. MeloMaster (talk) 06:59, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply] Fyi, i already added R with possibilities on the redirect you created, which means a notice for a draft already exists. The article is not meet WP:TVSERIES yet and also see WP:RELIABLESOURCES. I actually would like to create it directly on the mainspace before but like what i said it is not notable enough. So im going to redirect it. 𝙰𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚊(talk) 07:16, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply] Just a heads-up: I haven't forgotten about Draft:Scarecrow (TV series). In that case, my draft actually existed first, even though the title was different. Despite that, you created the mainspace page with the corrected title The Scarecrow (TV series) anyway. That article also doesn't also fully meet WP:TVSERIES yet and also see WP:RELIABLESOURCES yet, but it remains in the mainspace. MeloMaster (talk) 07:21, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply] It is because i provided filming section and sources that meets WP:TVSERIES. 𝙰𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚊(talk) 07:23, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply] Sure i'll try to request for merge. 𝙰𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚊(talk) 07:24, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply] Regarding The Scarecrow, let’s not merge that history. We are both in the same situation across these two articles, and it is better if we just stop arguing over them and move on. Let's keep both articles as they are now and focus on improving the content rather than worrying about the history merges. It’s better for both of us to just stay consistent and work together on the pages from here. MeloMaster (talk) 07:30, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply] Sure. 𝙰𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚊(talk) 07:34, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply] If you're willing, can you expand the Draft:Doctor Shin? Like adding some details.. For the citation i already formatting it. 𝙰𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚊(talk) 07:41, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply] Okay, I will! MeloMaster (talk) 07:45, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply] Tqvm! 𝙰𝚒𝚍𝚒𝚕𝚕𝚒𝚊(talk) 07:47, 27 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Awakening (TV series) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 January 29 § Awakening (TV series) until a consensus is reached. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 20:09, 29 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to 2026 in Chinese television. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it has no sources and It needs content at least some of the sections. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Josey Wales Parley 11:49, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello MeloMaster, Thank you for creating the Draft:2026 in Chinese television article. However, it lacks context and sources. I would appreciate it if you could update the article, as in its current form it cannot be maintained in the mainspace and has therefore been draftified. Regards. QEnigma 论 11:57, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi QEnigma, thanks for the feedback! I’ll get to work on adding the necessary context and sources, and I'll move it back once it's up to standard. Best, MeloMaster. MeloMaster (talk) 12:50, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Long Vacation (South Korean TV series) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 February 7 § Long Vacation (South Korean TV series) until a consensus is reached. ꕥ 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 ꕥ →𝙼𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚐𝚎 𝚖𝚎← 20:47, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2026 in South Korean television, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nate was added.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:52, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Redirects from .mobile domain names indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 22:37, 11 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@MeloMaster Your recently created Draft:The Ordinary Jackpot but it duplicates with Draft:Lotto 1st Place Winner Goes to Work. I suggest you to either not improved it or request a speedy delete via }. Also better review the reliable sources at WP:KO/RS when creating Korean-related articles. ꕥ 𝙳.𝟷𝟾𝚝𝚑 ꕥ →𝙼𝚎𝚜𝚜𝚊𝚐𝚎 𝚖𝚎← 14:18, 14 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ok... MeloMaster (talk) 14:24, 14 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]