User talk:PPEMES

Please address issues on related talk pages in the article realm rather than here. Feel free to } on location, though.

Unfortunately, I am generally unable to respond to messages via e-mail. If still sent, they may be published on this talk page instead. Thank you!

Userboxes This editor has been awarded the Original Barnstar   This editor has been awarded the Christianity Barnstar   This editor has been awarded the Christianity Barnstar   This editor has been awarded the Teamwork Barnstar   This user has been identified as an awesome Wikipedian.

Archives

July 2015 August 2015 September 2015 October 2015 November 2015 December 2015 January 2016 April 2016 May 2016 June 2016 July 2016 August 2016 October 2016 November 2016 December 2016 January 2017 February 2017 March 2017 April 2017 June 2017 July 2017 August 2017 September 2017 October 2017 November 2017 December 2017 January 2018 February 2018 March 2018 April 2018 May 2018 June 2018 July 2018 August 2018 September 2018 October 2018 November 2018 December 2018 January 2019 February 2019 March 2019 April 2019 May 2019 June 2019 July 2019 August 2019 September 2019 October 2019 November 2019 December 2019 January 2020 February 2020 March 2020 April 2020 May 2020 June 2020 July 2020 August 2020 November 2020 March 2021 April 2021 May 2021 June 2021 July 2021 November 2021 December 2021 January 2022 February 2022 March 2022 June 2022 July 2022 October 2022 November 2022 February 2023 March 2023 April 2023 June 2023 July 2023 August 2023

@Adville: Hello Adville. I have a request for you. After a stint of exiguous contributions a few years ago to this beautiful project for free information, I haven't been able to contribute much the last couple of years. As for the SVWP coverage further ago, clearly a significant chunk of those contributions and their offered rationale did not univocally please the admins. However, now that the overall contributions have ended here as much as there, with no intention to be resumed for the foreseeable future, do you think it would be possible to consider reinstating the editing rights of the user talk page over at SVWP? And possibly even the account's userpage? Thanks. PPEMES (talk) 15:45, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, My apologizes for not answering earlier (you wrote 2 weeks ago somewhere). I just sat and read your svwp talk page. As it looks, even if it was a long time ago, it was very hard the first time to make it open to let you back. I guess it is even harder now. I do not see the reason you want it to be opened again (and not start on a new blank account, but keeping away from church-related subjects). If you explained the purpose here on your talk page I could start a KAW to see what the gemenskapen thinks about it. Br Adville (talk) 16:52, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply] @Adville: Thank you. It concerns but perfunctory reaccess to account talk page. PPEMES (talk) 23:09, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply] @Adville: Do let me know should I be able to assist you. PPEMES (talk) 19:19, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply] @Ternarius: I was previously in good contact also with you. Perhaps the two of you would be willing to have a look at it? Let me know if I can help with any more information than above. PPEMES (talk) 15:59, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply] If Adville wants my help, I'm of course willing to help him. Respectfully, I think I limit my contribution to that level. BR / Ternarius (talk) 18:21, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply] Sorry again for a late answer. Working and not lookong too much on enwp. Why do you need access to your talk page on svwp? Just give a reason, and ping me, and I might open the access to write. Br. Adville (talk) 19:30, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply] @Adville: Thanks. No stress. Excuse, though, I'm not sure I understood the question why I would prefer to have the talk page blocked as opposed to not having it blocked? PPEMES (talk) 17:41, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply] @Adville: Been blocked from userpage and talk page for more than 5 years. Along with the general block. What do you think about the idea of unblocking userpage and talk page? Do you think it could be justified? PPEMES (talk) 10:31, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply] The reason is "why?" you will most sertain not be unblocked on svwp anyway. Last time you were unblocked it lasted maximum a month... Do you want to change your user page, then I can help you to do the change (if it is a neutral change). Br. Adville (talk) 13:49, 22 March 2024 (UTC)[reply] @Adville: and @Ternarius: Thank you both for your kind replies. The Swedish user account has now been blocked for several years. I accept the retribution. I regret any inconveniences caused by participation in discussions relating to ecclesiological nomenclature, or any other related issues. I acknowledge that nomenclature on Swedish Wikipedia may differ from that of English Wikipedia or others. I do not intend to participate in those discussions Swedish Wikipedia anymore (nor have I done so for years on English Wikipedia either). In case any specific edit on my talk page or elsewhere on Swedish Wikipedia failed to conform to any policy on discussions or otherwise on Swedish Wikipedia, I would be grateful for the possibility convey my apology. I would be grateful if you would be willing to consider unblocking the Swedish Wikipedia userpage and/or talk page, even as an alternative only for a limited time period. If there is still any hesitation about the proposal due to any remaining concerns relating to what I addressed or failed to address above, I would be grateful if you would please let me know. Thank you! PPEMES (talk) 17:06, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Military saints has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. NLeeuw (talk) 21:29, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I fully support WP:INFOBOXCOL but some of your nominations fail WP:BEFORE. Additionally by not adding |type=sidebar to your nominations you are breaking articles. Please slow down and check your work... Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:39, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also when you propose a merge, you need to tag both articles. Consider using WP:TWINKLE for future nominations... Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:40, 18 December 2025 (UTC)[reply] Thank you for the information on this issue, and thank you for your kind help. PPEMES (talk) 16:56, 26 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Tribes of Thailand has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Arctic Circle System (talk) 21:34, 11 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of converts to Catholicism from Islam has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This fails WP:NLIST] and so it shouldn't exist, none of these people are none for their conversions. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of converts to Islam from Hinduism, deprod and I'll take it to AfD. This also fails WP:NOPAGE because it can be merged with List of converts to Christianity from Islam

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion based on established criteria.

If the proposed deletion has already been carried out, you may request undeletion of the article at any time.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]