User talk:Candidly ish

Hello, I'm Knitsey. I noticed that you recently removed content from Sargun Kaur Luthra without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Knitsey (talk) 09:36, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Kanika Dhillon, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. bojo | talk 14:51, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Pickersgill-Cunliffe. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Sid Mallya—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 19:17, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Candidly ish. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Divya Khosla Kumar, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Candidly ish. The template } can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Candidly ish|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Charlie (talk) 18:24, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm KuyaMoHirowo. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Divya Khosla Kumar, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. KuyaMoHirowo • he/him (DM me on Discord at kuyamohirowo (DMs are open!)) :3 20:23, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Candidly ish. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Divya Khosla Kumar, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the Edit Request Wizard), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. CNMall41 (talk) 22:22, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been asked a number of times to explain your relationship with Divya Khosla Kumar and the edits you have done there. Claiming that you are performing changes approved or requested by the subject does not give your edits added authority or leeway to not cite reliable sources. Quite the opposite, they indicate that you have a conflict of interest and your edits should be thoroughly vetted.

Continued editing in this manner, while not disclosing your association with her, will simply be reverted and may result in your account being blocked as disruptive. Please read what the above says about conflict of interests. Escape Orbit (Talk) 11:01, 8 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

to help you clear your doubt I can show you the agreement for your reference to sort the communication we can also take this conversation further over email to more clarity. Please let me know if that suits you Candidly ish (talk) 15:49, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply] I am only trying to do my job and to streamlines things further I dont mind sending in my changes to you before going ahead with the changes directly also, I need to update her name throughout her original name has two "s" in her surname it is "Khossla" not "Khosla" Please see if you can update the same from the backend Candidly ish (talk) 15:51, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Divya Khosla Kumar. Escape Orbit (Talk) 15:20, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Escape Orbit, I am making necessary changes as per my discussion with the owner of the page- Divya Khosla. So all changes updated are post approval from the artist. Please let me know if you have any other concerns Candidly ish (talk) 15:47, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Divya Khosla Kumar have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Divya Khosla Kumar was changed by Candidly ish (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.897697 on 2025-12-12T09:10:58+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:11, 12 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been warned numerous times about undisclosed paid editing, which you admitted to, but have yet to make the proper disclosure and still decide to edit the page of your client at Divya Khosla Kumar. If you continue to edit without disclosure, it will need to be reported to the appropriate noticeboard where you will likely be blocked from editing. CNMall41 (talk) 23:15, 17 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Will it be okay if I share the relevant links Here and you make the necessary changes because I am attaching the links and then also it going back to the original page. so that's also not correct. As I mentioned the page changes are requested by the artist herself and I have been putting relevant proofs too but still it is going back to the original. I Would request you to let the changes appear on the page attaching relevant links for it Savi trending on Netflix point added by me ref https://www.bollywoodshaadis.com/articles/divya-khossla-dropped-kumar-from-her-name-for-a-better-career-and-her-film-savi-is-now-trending-55041 then her recent release Ek Chatur Naar loved by the audience and trending on Netflix you can check Netflix past records. no article that I can find at the moment on that. there were media articles on the love for chatur naar which I tried to add I can attach those links too and she was trending on no. 1 on imdb as the most popular celeb as per fans searches -= that was removed attaching the relevant link https://www.instagram.com/p/DRhX-CWDHMr/?igsh=MXdueGd2enRueGljaQ%3D%3D Candidly ish (talk) 07:31, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. Atlantic306 (talk) 23:18, 22 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning if you make any further edits without responding to the inquiry you received regarding undisclosed paid editing. Jupitus Smart 07:06, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You say "I need to make important edits to the page." No, you don't. You are a paid editor with a conflict of interest. Therefore, you don't make edits to the page AT ALL. You don't manage the article on Wikipedia. Nobody manages any article here. The only edits you could make are minor corrections to spelling, grammar, and typos. You can also add citations to reliable sources that are independent of the subject. You can use WP:Edit Request Wizard to propose anything more substantive on the talk page. There is no way you can be unblocked until you can convince an administrator that you understand what you can and cannot do. ~Anachronist (who / me) (talk) 17:38, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]