 |
 | This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trucks, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of trucks on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TrucksWikipedia:WikiProject TrucksTemplate:WikiProject TrucksTrucks | | | High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. |
|
 | This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany | | | Top | This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. | | WikiProject Companies To-do: |
|---|

|
Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
| |
|
|
 | This article is within the scope of WikiProject Motorcycling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Motorcycling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MotorcyclingWikipedia:WikiProject MotorcyclingTemplate:WikiProject MotorcyclingMotorcycling | | | Top | This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. | | To-do list: |
|---|
|

|
Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
| |
|
|
 | This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile | | | Top | This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. |
|
 | This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands | | | High | This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. |
|
|
1million yen is 8,600 USD. Not 5000 USD. Pretty significant difference. I cannot recall any period in the last two decades where the US dollar was worth roughly twice the equivalent denomination yen (I.e. 100¥) 220.218.219.177 (talk) 00:47, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
In my opinion, the bold 'Power equipment' hyperlink on the 'Products' tab should be moved to the 'See also' section of the article as in my opinion it looks strange having a hyperlink within the main body of the article. Xboxsponge15 (talk) 15:01, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
MOS:LINKSTYLE says to not put links of any type in section headings. So I changed that external link into a reference in the first sentence below the heading.
Stepho talk 03:04, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This article may have been prematurely assessed.
- Citations: The criteria #1 states; The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. It has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged is cited.
- The criteria includes The article is reasonably well-written.. The list of categories includes "Articles with disputed statements..." and "Articles containing potentially dated statements" which does not seem indicative of "well-written. The article has been reassessed pending the resolution of issues. -- Otr500 (talk) 23:36, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The wikitable in the "Corporate profile and divisions" as well as the layout of the "US sales" and Production numbers wikitables leaves too much blank screen so could be better organized. It seems to me that there just are too many Illustrations. --
Otr500 (
talk)
06:49, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
No problem with the re-assessment. But why is whitespace evil? Clarity is better than density.
Stepho talk 09:21, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Reply: I just feel that a layout can be presented that doesn't have big blank ("whitespace") areas. Of course, clarity is optimum but an option that includes clarity, while not having wasted space, would seem to be better. I am not really proficient at adjusting the layout so it would be a time-intensive experiment. Thanks for the comments, --
Otr500 (
talk)
18:41, 13 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There are six entries in the "External links". Three seems to be an acceptable number and of course, everyone has their favorite to add for four. The problem is that none is needed for article promotion.
- ELpoints #3) states: Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum. A lack of external links or a small number of external links is not a reason to add external links.
- LINKFARM states: There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to the external links section of an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Wikipedia. On articles about topics with many fansites, for example, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate.
- WP:ELMIN: Minimize the number of links. -- Otr500 (talk) 06:36, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
hello i would like to know how to permanently fix the leak from the VV-TEC solenoid, this year alone (2023) i have had to replace the alternator 4 times and also had the gasket replaced 2 times and yet there is still a leak. its only june!!!
i'm scared to think how many more i will have to buy this year. PLEASE make this a recall thing so that hard working individuals like me dont have to spend every last dollar on fixing our vehicles every month. 192.186.111.194 (talk) 19:05, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It would be best to ask about it at a dedicated automotive forum rather than here. See
WP:TALK#TOPIC for details.
Blake Gripling (
talk)
02:40, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]