Talk:Battle of Treviso

Battle of Treviso is currently a Warfare good article nominee. Nominated by A.Cython(talk) at 02:32, 22 January 2026 (UTC) Any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and then save the page. See the good article instructions. Short description: Battle during the Gothic War (535–554)

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: European / Italian / Roman & Byzantine / Medieval This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  European military history task force Italian military history task force (c. 500 – present) Roman and Byzantine military history task force Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500) Greece: Byzantine Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greek history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreece Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Byzantine world task force. Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Italy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Middle Ages Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

@A.Cython: B class. Nice work. However, please note the two issues below. BTW: I recently read Justinian's Empire by Nick Holmes and found this era fascinating. Djmaschek (talk) 05:46, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• In the following sentence, it seems like the word with should be changed to when. "The issue was resolved with the Rugians of Odovacar, who had submitted to Theoderic but retained a distinct identity in northern Italy, seized the opportunity to proclaim Eraric, their leading figure, as king."
• Please add one or more dates to the Prelude section. When did Ravenna fall?

Many thanks for the suggestions, I made the suggested changes. I added dates wherever it was possible. I will have a look if could some more dates. A.Cython(talk) 05:55, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

• @A.Cython: Thanks for adding the dates. That helps a lot. Djmaschek (talk) 05:03, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]