 | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a contentious topic.The following restrictions apply to everyone editing this article:
- This page is protected. You must be logged-in to an extended confirmed account (granted automatically to accounts with 500 edits and an age of 30 days)
- You must follow the bold-revert-discuss cycle if your change is reverted. You may not reinstate your edit until you post a talk page message discussing your edit and have waited 24 hours from the time of this talk page message
Restrictions placed: 29 April 2025 Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
 |
 | This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history | |  | | This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: | |
|---|
 Referencing and citation: criterion met- Coverage and accuracy: criterion met
- Structure: criterion met
- Grammar and style: criterion met
- Supporting materials: criterion met
| |
| |
|
|
 | This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 3 times. The weeks in which this happened: |
I'm placing this article under an "Enforced BRD" restriction the Arbcom ruling at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan. In addition to the usual contentious topics restrictions, please note that, editors are prohibited re-reversion until someone has posted a note on the talk page about the revert and waited 24 hours after posting the note.RegentsPark (comment) 20:58, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Mention of the number of terrorists appears in a number of ways throughout the article. In the first paragraph "by at least three armed terrorists". In the 5th paragraph "three perpetrators were killed. The exact number of terrorists could not be ascertained". In the section #Attack "2-7 terrorists" is mentioned with a large number of citations. There is also an explanatory footnote here "The exact number of terrorists is unknown" with three more citations (This efn is practically a copy of the line in the intro). The section #Investigations and operations also mentions the number of terrorists in its own way, say through sketches released and number of terrorists killed during operation Mahadev. What would be the best way to reconcile this aspect of the article? For example, should we remove mention of the number of terrorists from the first line completely? EldenMacdonald (talk) 14:21, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia
_without_national_boundaries.svg){kind=small}
