List of pharaohs

The pharaohs were the rulers of Ancient Egypt from the unification of Upper and Lower Egypt c. 3100 BC, with several times of fragmentation and foreign rule. The specific title of "pharaoh" was not used until the New Kingdom, c. 1400 BC, but it is retroactively applied to all Egyptian kings; the generic term for monarchs was "nesut". In addition to these titles, pharaohs had a complex royal titulary that remained relatively constant during its 3000-year history, having up to five royal names.

Pharaoh of Egypt
The Pschent combined the Red and White crowns of Lower and Upper Egypt
Last native king
Nectanebo II
c. 360–342 BC
Details
StyleFive-name titulary
First monarchNarmer/Menes
Last monarch
Formationc. 3100 BC (± 150 years)
Abolition
  • 342 BC
    (last native)
  • 30 BC
    (last Hellenistic)
  • 313 AD
    (last use of title)
ResidenceVaries by era
AppointerHereditary

The pharaohs were the rulers of Ancient Egypt from the unification of Upper and Lower Egypt c. 3100 BC, with several times of fragmentation and foreign rule. The specific title of "pharaoh" (pr-ꜥꜣ) was not used until the New Kingdom, c. 1400 BC, but it is retroactively applied to all Egyptian kings; the generic term for monarchs was "nesut" (nswt). In addition to these titles, pharaohs had a complex royal titulary that remained relatively constant during its 3000-year history, having up to five royal names.

Egypt was continually governed, at least in part, by native pharaohs for approximately 2500 years, until it was conquered by the Kingdom of Kush in the late 8th century BC, whose rulers adopted the pharaonic titulature and became the 25th Dynasty. Following 100 years of Kushite rule, Egypt experienced another century of independent native rule before being conquered by the Persian Achaemenid Empire. The last native pharaoh was Nectanebo II of the short-lived 30th Dynasty, which ended when the Persians conquered Egypt for a second time in 342 BC. The Persians were in turn conquered by the Macedonian Greeks of Alexander the Great in 332 BC, after which Egypt was ruled by the Hellenic pharaohs of the Ptolemaic dynasty. Their rule came to an end with the Roman conquest of Egypt in 30 BC, and pharaonic Egypt cesased to be an independent monarchy. However, Roman emperors continued to be accorded pharaonic titles by the Egyptians until the reign of Maximinus Daza in 313 AD.

The dates provided for most of Egypt's early history are only approximate and may vary depending on the author, sometimes by centuries. The names and order of kings is mostly based on the Digital Egypt for Universities database developed by the Petrie Museum of Egyptian Archaeology.[4] For royal titles and hieroglyphs, see the handbook of Jürgen von Beckerath,[5] as well as the website Pharaohs of Ancient Egypt, which itself contains extensive bibliography.[6]

Regnal numbers did not exist in Ancient Egypt and is a modern way to distinguish pharaohs who shared the same personal name.

Sources and chronology

[edit]

Modern lists of pharaohs are based on historical records, including Ancient Egyptian king lists and later histories, as well as archaeological evidence. Concerning ancient sources, Egyptologists and historians alike call for caution regarding their credibility, exactitude, and completeness, many of which were written long after the reigns they report. An additional problem is that ancient king lists are often damaged, inconsistent with one another, and/or selective.

Given the lack of sources, it's impossible to fix exact dates for the early dynasties. However, most authors give dates around 3000 BC.[7][8][4][9][10][i] According to computations derived from the Turin King List (c. 1250 BC), the First Dynasty most likely began c. 3100 BC, ± 150 years.[12][13] This appears to be supported by radiocarbon dating studies, which often show earlier dates.[14][15][ii]

Astronomical events, mainly the Sothic cycle, have also been used to try to fix "absolute dates", but these have their own set of problems. Richard Parker dated the accession of the 12th-dynasty pharaoh Senusret III to 1878 BC (with his 7th year falling in 1872 BC).[12][16] However, other authors such as Rolf Krauss have refuted Parker's computations; Krauss instead dates Senusret's accession to 1837/36 BC (7th year in 1831/30 BC). Similarly, the accession Amenhotep I was dated c. 1550–1515 BC (9th year c. 1541–1506 BC).[17] Scholars often use the Egyptian "high" chronology, which assumes these astronomical observations were made in a single place (at Memphis). While there is debate on its accuracy,[iii] the high chronology used by scholars such as Ian Shaw appears to be closer to the dates implied by radiocarbon dating.[23][24][iv]

Most pharaohs' reigns are not fully documented, leading to many discrepancies in reign lengths. A formal regnal dating system was not adopted until the Middle Kingdom, and the day following a coronation was automatically recorded as "Year 1", meaning that regnal years alone can't be used to calculate exact Julian years.[v] Thus, it is impossible to determine exact dates even when some events can be securely dated. Dates with some certainty can only be given for the New Kingdom onwards, and only dates from the Late Period can be securely dated and synchronized with other ancient chronologies.

Compare the chronological lists in Beckerath 1997, pp. 187–192, Beckerath 1999, pp. 283–289, University College London 2000, Bunson 2002, pp. 105–108, Shaw 2003, pp. 481–488, Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, pp. 490–495, Mladjov 2021a and Mladjov 2021b.

Ancient Egyptian king lists

[edit]

Royal lists after the Fifth Dynasty give only the throne name of each pharaoh, which has often led to confusion in identifying particular kings. The most detailed king lists, the Abydos, Saqqara and Turin canons, date to the New Kingdom, also known as the Ramesside period. Unfortunately, most of these Ramesside lists are of little value for the early dynasties (from which they are separated by over 1000 years), as they feature corrupted names and often disagree with contemporary sources. Complete king lists were certainly made after the 20th dynasty, but they have been lost.

The following king list are known:[28]

Manetho

[edit]

Before the decipherment of Egyptian scripts in the early 19th century, Manetho's Aegyptiaca, written in Greek in the early 3rd century BC,[vi] was the sole source for all ancient Egyptian history. Manetho, himself an Egyptian priest, recorded the entirety of his country's history from mythological times until the conquest of Alexander the Great in 332 BC. He also created the dynastic framework still used by modern scholars, as well as coining the term "dynasty" itself.[34] The original work is now lost and survives only through later epitomes and quotations, chiefly in the writings of Josephus (Contra Apionem, c. 100 AD), Julius Africanus (c. 230 AD), and Eusebius (c. 330 AD). These summaries transmit primarily chronological data in the form of regnal lists, though Josephus' quotations show that Manetho originally included detailed narratives, regnal lengths in years and months (rounded as years alone by Africanus and Eusebius), and even alternate royal names.

Africanus' epitome, which is preserved by George Syncellus (c. 810 AD), is generally regarded as the most reliable, while that of Eusebius is considered more problematic, having been derived from an incomplete and already corrupted source.[vii] All surviving transmissions suffer from errors, inconsistencies in regnal totals, variant name spellings, and a failure to account for contemporaneous dynasties—whether due to Manetho himself or to later copyists. Josephus, Africanus, and Eusebius all used independent, and sometimes contradictory, versions of the same work, each copy adding a new layer of typos and corruptions.[36][35][37]

The content of the Aegyptiaca must be treated with caution. Manetho likely blended historical tradition with mythology, and later Christian authors are known to have altered Manetho's figures, especially for the Second Intermediate Period, to accommodate events into the Biblical narrative.[38] Additional distortion arose from the transmission of Egyptian royal names into Greek and from repeated copying over centuries (Greek, like Latin, was written using scriptio continua, with no spaces or punctuation between words). Despite these limitations, Manetho remains a foundational source for Egyptian chronology, provided his data are critically evaluated and corroborated with archaeological and contemporary evidence.

Some fragments of Egyptian history are also covered by some Greek historians such a Herodotus (c. 450 BC) and Diodorus Siculus (c. 50 BC).[39][40][41]

Number of kings

[edit]

The Turin King List records 207 kings up to the end of Dynasty XVI. In addition, it preserves 16 damaged names that Kim Ryholt associates with the so-called Abydos Dynasty, totaling 223 kings in the preserved papyrus.[29] The original document, however, likely extended until the reign of Ramesses II, just as the Saqqara and Ramesseum king lists. On this basis, the Turin King List probably listed at least 27 additional rulers: nine of Dynasty XVII, fifteen of Dynasty XVIII, and the first three kings of Dynasty XIX, yielding a minimum total of 250 kings.

The papyrus also contains several lacunae, explicit gaps marked by the Ramesside scribes when names in their sources were illegible. Ryholt estimates that these lacunae represent at least 12 missing kings: six for Dynasty XIII, and at least six for Dynasty XIV.[42] In addition, there is a lacuna in Column 5.15 that very likely corresponds to Manetho's Dynasty VII, consisting of 10 additional kings recorded only in the Abydos King List.[43][44] There are also two instances of fictitious kings, both in Dynasty IV (likely Manetho's Bikheris and Thamphthis). Taking this into account, the total rises to at least 227 kings up to the end of Dynasty XVI, 243 up to the end of the Abydos Dynasty, and 270 until Ramesses II. Even these figures likely remain conservative, since a small number of ephemeral or disputed rulers —such as Sneferka or Ba at the end of Dynasty I— were probably omitted altogether.

Including the subsequent periods of native and foreign rule, the total of kings reaches more than 300 before the first Persian conquest, which closely aligns with Herodotus' statement that, following Menes, Egypt was ruled by "three hundred and thirty kings, whose names the priests recited from a papyrus roll".[39]:100[viii] Manetho's own total of kings is roughly 360 kings in 5470 years, but the sum of individual reigns amounts to more than 500 kings in 5370 years.[ix] Diodorus Siculus writes that mortal kings have ruled Egypt for "a little less than five thousand years".[41]

Royal names and titulature

[edit]

The first Egyptian kings were known by their Horus name (serekh), with additional Nebty and Golden Horus honorifics. From the late First Dynasty onwards, kings began to use a throne name known in English as the prenomen (nswt-bjtj or nisut-bity, "Sedge and Bee"), which was the main name used during the Fourth Dynasty as well as the royal name found in most king-lists. The next dynasty introduced the nomen (Sa-Ra, "son of Ra"), which is often understood as a personal name. This is the name used by scholars after the Fifth Dynasty, as well as the name used by Manetho for most pharaohs. Given the confusing nature of royal names, only kings who are recorded with their two cartouche names (prenomen and nomen) can be securely identified. Throne names assigned to pre-Fifth Dynasty pharaohs are sometimes referred to as "personal names" by scholars, as there was probably no distinction between throne and personal names at the time.[45] For a listing and description of all royal names, from Predynastic to Ptolemaic times, see Leprohon 2013.

Protodynastic Period

[edit]

The Protodynastic Period of Egypt spans from the formation of the first Egyptian states about 3300 BC to about 3000 BC, when Egypt was first unified as a single kingdom by the rulers of Upper Egypt. Before this, both Lower and Upper Egypt were divided into several small kingdoms. The terms "Lower Egypt" and "Upper Egypt" are based on the direction of the Nile's flow, which is north. Consequently, "Lower Egypt" is located north (downstream), while "Upper Egypt" is located south (upstream).

Lower Egypt

[edit]

Lower Egypt geographically consists of the northern Nile and the Nile delta.

The Palermo Stone mentions 14 predynastic pharaohs by their Horus name from Lower Egypt. These may be mythical kings or semi-gods preserved through oral tradition, or posthumous names of earlier pharaohs. The original document likely contained rulers for Upper Egypt as well.

  (#)  – Existence disputed

Other rulers include:

Other potential rulers, most of which have only placeholder names, have also been proposed by Günter Dreyer,[49][46] but this is disputed.[47]

Upper Egypt

[edit]

Upper Egypt refers to the region up-river to the south of Lower Egypt. There were at least three policies by the Naqada II period (c. 3500 BC): Thinis (with its cemetery at Abydos), Naqada and Hierakonpolis.[48]

  (#)  – Existence disputed

While the early dynasties were aware of their pre-dynastic history, this appears to have been all but forgotten by the Ramessid period. Later sources refer to the Menes/Narmer as the first "human king", succeeding the gods that ruled Egypt for times immemorial. Later tradition also identified him as the founder of Memphis, when in fact the city had existed since before the reign of Iry-Hor.[58]

Early Dynastic Period (c. 3100–2700 BC)

[edit]

The sole "contemporary" source for early dynastic chronology is the Palermo Stone and its associated fragments. The Turin King List, is not considered reliable for this period, as it often contradicts contemporary sources. The annals are badly damaged, and only a few names are explicitly recorded, leading to several and divergent reconstructions over the decades. Unless otherwise noted, the reconstruction follows Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006.[xi] Lastly, it's worth noting that virtually all transliterations are just approximations (Egyptian is an extinct language); certain spellings may change depending on the author.

First Dynasty

[edit]

Ancient sources, including Manetho, assign eight rulers to the First Dynasty, a fact confirmed by the records in the necropolis of Qa'a, the last pharaoh.[64] The tombs of all pharaohs, including queen Merneith, are located in the necropolis of Umm El Qa'ab, Abydos. The first two dynasties originated from the lost city of Thinis, and ruled from Memphis according to later traditions.[65]

Manetho correctly assigns eight kings to this dynasty, but his order and naming are troublesome.[xii] Ramesside king lists, made 1000 years later, identify all eight kings with throne names, but none of them match contemporary records. Throne names were introduced by the fifth king, so the first names must be later additions, possibly posthumous epithets.[xiii] As noted before, the dynasty must have begun c. 3100 BC, ± 150 years.[12][14][xi]

Proposed dates: c. 3007–2828 (179 years),[7] c. 2920–2770 (150 years),[8] c. 3000–2750 (250 years),[4] c. 3000–2890 (110 years),[9] c. 2900–2730 (170 years)[10]

  (#)  – Status ambiguous

Comparison of royal lists:

Historical
pharaoh
Ramesside king lists[79][80] Aegyptiaca[35] Royal Annals
Abydos Saqqara Turin Africanus Eusebius Hornung[61] Wilkinson[81] CAH[82] Helck[83]
Narmer Meni Meni Μηνης Menes 62 Μηνης Menes 60 32 years
Aha Teti Teti Aθωθις Athothis 57 Aθωθις Athothis 27 1 year
Djer Iti Iti Κενκενης Kenkenes 31 Κενκενης Kenkenes 39 47 years 41 years 47 years 54 years
Djet Ita […]tui Ουενεφης Ouenephes 23 Ουενεφης Ouenephes 42 10 years 11 years
Den Khasty Septi Qenti Ουσαφαιδoς Ousaphaidos 20 Ουσαφαης Ousaphais 20 42 years 32 years 44–60 years 43 years
Adjib Merbiap Meribiap Merbapen Merigeregipen Μιεβιδoς Miebidos 26 Nιεβαης Niebais 26 8 years 10 years 7 years 11 years
Semerkhet Iry Semsu Semsen Σεμεμψης Semempses 18 Σεμεμψης Semempses 18 9 years 9 years 8 years 9 years
Qa'a Qebeh Qebehu Qebeh Βιηνεχης Bienekhes 26 Ουβιενθης Oubienthes 26 33 years 26 years 33 years
253 years (actually 263) 252 years (actually 258) 150+ years 100+ years 140+ years 185 years

Second Dynasty

[edit]

The following table follows the royal records of the Saqqara and Turin lists, which coincide with Manetho in recording nine kings. Following the reign of Nynetjer, the country was split and remained so until the reign of Khasekhemwy.[84] The five Ramesside names between Nynetjer and Khasekhemwy cannot be securely correlated with contemporary rulers, leading to much confusion in the correct identification of rulers. The tombs of the first three pharaohs were found in Saqqara, while those of Seth-Peribsen and Khasekhemwy were found in Umm El Qa'ab.

Proposed dates: c. 2828–2682 (146 years),[7] c. 2770–2649 BC (121 years),[8] c. 2750–2650 BC (100 years),[4] c. 2890–2686 (204 years),[9] c. 2730–2590 BC (140 years)[10]

Comparison of royal lists

Ancient
Historical
pharaoh
Giza
(5th dynasty)
Abydos
(19th)
Saqqara
(19th)
Turin (19th)[88] Aegyptiaca[35] Royal Annals
Name Reign Lifespan Africanus Eusebius Hornung[104] Wilkinson[81] Helck[83]
Hotepsekhemwy Bedjau Bedjau Baunetjer [Bau]netjer […] 95y Βoηθoς Boethos 38 Βωχος Bochos 39 years
Nebra Kakau Kakau Kakau […] […] Καιεχως Kaiekhos 39 Χωος Choös
Nynetjer Banetjer Banetjeru Bau[netjer] […] 95y Βίνωθρις Binothris 47 Βίοφις Biophis 40 years 45 years
unknown Wadjnas Wadjlas [Wadjne]s […] 70y Τλας Tlas 17 33 years
unknown Sendi Senedj Senedj […] 54y Σεθενης Sethenes 41
unknown Neferkara Aaka […] 70y Χαιρης Khaires 17
unknown Neferkasokar Neferkasokar 8y, 3m […] Nεφερχερης Nephercheres 25 8
unknown Hudjefa I Hudjefa 11y, 8m, 4d 34y Σεσωχρις Sesochris 48 Σεσωχρις Sesochris 48 12
Khasekhemwy Djadjay Bebti Bebti 27y, 2m, 1d 40y Χενερης Kheneres 30 18 years
302 years 297 years
Dynasties I–II, 555 years
(actual sum is 565 years)
Dynasties I–II, 549 years
(actual sum is 555 years)
Modern
Beckerath 1999 UCL 2000 Clayton 2001 Bunson 2002 Shaw 2003 Hornung et al. 2006
  1. Hotepsekhemwy
  2. Nebra
  3. Ninetjer
  4. Weneg
  5. Sened
  6. Sekhemib
  7. Peribsen
  8. Neferkara
  9. Neferkasokar
  10. Hudjefa I
  11. Khasekhemwy
  1. Hotepsekhemwy
  2. Raneb
  3. Ninetjer
  4. Sekhemib
  5. Peribsen
  6. Sened
  7. Weneg
  8. Khasekhem(wy)
  1. Hotepsekhemwy
  2. Raneb
  3. Ninetjer
  4. Peribsen
  5. Khasekhemwy
  1. Hotepsekhemwy
  2. Re'neb
  3. Ninetjer
  4. Weneg
  5. Peribsen
  6. Sendji
  7. Neferka
  8. Neferkara
  9. Kha'sekhemwy
  1. Hetepsekhemwy
  2. Raneb
  3. Nynetjer
  4. Weneg
  5. Sened
  6. Peribsen
  7. Khasekhemwy
  1. Hetep-sekhemwy
  2. Ra'-neb
  3. Ny-netjer
  4. Per-ibsen
  5. Sekhem-ib
  6. Sened
  7. Kha-sekhemwy

Old Kingdom (c. 2700–2200 BC)

[edit]

The history of ancient Egypt is divided into three "golden ages" (Old, Middle, and New Kingdom), interspersed between three periods of fragmentation known as "intermediate periods". The capital during the period of the Old Kingdom was also Memphis. According to radiocarbon dating, the Old Kingdom began sometime around the mid-27th century BC, possibly between 2676 and 2643 BC, but with more certainty between 2691 and 2625 BC.[24]

Third Dynasty

[edit]

Ancient sources assign five rulers to the Third Dynasty, but there is uncertainty regarding their exact order and chronology. Both the Turin and Abydos king lists claim that the Third Dynasty was founded by Nebka, hence his position in some modern lists. However, archeological evidence has shown that the founder was in fact Djoser, who is correctly identified as its first king in the Saqqara Tablet. The dynasty ruled 74 years according to the Turin King List, but its numbers do not match with the earlier Palermo Stone; the actual duration may be as low as 50 years.[105]

Proposed dates: c. 2682–2614 BC (68 years),[7] c. 2649–2575 BC (74 years),[8] c. 2686–2600 BC (86 years),[4] c. 2686–2613 BC (73 years),[9] c. 2592–2544 BC (48 years)[10]

Comparison of royal lists:

Giza
(5th dynasty)
Abydos
(19th)
Saqqara
(19th)
Turin
(19th)
Manetho (33rd)
Aricanus Eusebius
Nebka Djoser Nebka 19y […] Nεχερoφης Necherophes 28 Νεχερωχις Necherochis
Djeser-za Djoser-teti Djoser-it 19y, 1m Toσoρθρoς Tosorthros 29 Σεσορθος Sesorthos
Teti Teti Nebkare Djoser-ti 6y,[…] Tυρεις Tyreis 7 "The remaining six
accomplished nothing
worthy of mention"
Sedjes Hudjefa II 6y […] Nεχερoφης Mesochris 17
Neferkara Huni Hu(ni) 24y Σωυφις Soyphis 16
74 years total Toσερτασις Tosertasis 19
Aχης Aches 42
Σηφoνρις Sephouris 30
Kερφερης Kerpheres[xxii] 26
214 years 198 years
Dynasties I–III, 769 years
(actual sum is 779 years)
Dynasties I–III, 747 years
(actual sum is 753 years)

Fourth Dynasty

[edit]

The Fourth Dynasty is renowned for its colossal monuments and pyramids, most notably the Great Pyramid of Giza, one of the Seven Wonders of the Ancient World. While the first four kings are well attested, there is some uncertainty regarding the successors of Khafre in later sources. However, the tomb of Sekhemkare, vizier and son of Khafre, records the correct succession from Khafre Sahure. Sekhemkare supposedly lived under five pharaohs, which implies that the latter kings did not reign long. Some tales of this period were recorded by the Greek historian Herodotus, although he notably places it after the New Kingdom period.

The exact chronology of this dynasty is disputed, as scholars disagree whether cattle counts were made annually or biennially at this time. The following numbers assume most were annual.[115]

Proposed dates: c. 2614–2479 BC (135 years),[7] c. 2575–2465 BC (110 years),[8] c. 2600–2450 BC (150 years),[4] c. 2613–2494 BC (119 years),[9] c. 2543–2436 BC (107 years)[116]

  (#)  – Existence disputed

Comparison of royal lists:

Pharaoh Sekhemkare
(5th dynasty)[130]
Wadi Hammamat
(12th dynasty)[130]
Ramesside (18–19th) Herodotus[39]
(27th dynasty)
Manetho[35]
(33rd dynasty)
Reign Years
Karnak Abydos Saqqara Turin[131] Turin Herod. Afr. Eusb.
Sneferu Sneferu Sneferu Sneferu Snofer(u) 1. Soris Σωρις 24 29
Khufu Khufu Khufu Khufu Khufu Name lost Cheops Χεοπα 2. Souphis I Σoυφις 23 50 63
Djedefre Djedefre Djedefre Djedefre Name lost 5. Rhatoises Ρατoισης 8 25
Khafre Khafra Khafra Khafre Khafre Kha[…] Chephren Χεφρηνα 3. Souphis II Σoυφις Lost 56 66
Menkaure Menkaura Djedefhor Menkaure Name lost Name lost Mycerinus Μυκερινον 4. Menkeres Μενχερης 28 6 63
Bikheris Baufra Name lost Name lost 6. Bikheres Bιχερης Lost 22
Shepseskaf Shepseskaf Shepseskaf Name lost Name lost 7. Seberkheres Σεβερχερης 4 7
Thamphthis Name lost Name lost 8. Thamphthis[xxvi] Θαμφθις 2 9
Name lost 90+ 277
(284)
448
Africanus: Dyn. I–IV, 1046 years
(actual sum is 1063 years)
Eusebius: Dyn. I–IV, 1195 years
(actual sum is 1201 years)

Fifth Dynasty

[edit]

Starting with the reign of Neferirkare Kakai, pharaohs became mainly known by two names, a regnal (prenomen) and personal (nomen) name. The pharaohs of the Sixth Dynasty onwards are generally known by their nomen alone.

All variants of Manetho refer to the Fifth Dynasty as "kings from Elephantine". This is probably a misreading of "Sakhebu", a city near Heliopolis that was likely the hometown of Userkaf.[132]

Proposed dates: c. 2479–2322 BC (157 years),[7] c. 2465–2323 BC (142 years),[8] c. 2450–2300 BC (150 years),[4] c. 2494–2345 BC (149 years),[9] c. 2435–2306 BC (129 years)[133]

Comparison of royal lists

Pharaoh Karnak Abydos Saqqara Palermo Turin[131] Manetho (Africanus)[35]
Userkaf Userkaf Userkaf 8 years [User]kaf 7 Userkheres Ουσερχερης 28
Sahure Sahure Sahure Sahure 13 years Name lost 12 Sephres Σεφρης 13
Neferirkare Kakai Kakai Neferirkare Name lost Lost Nepherkheres Νεφερχερης 20
Shepseskare Shepseskare Name lost 7 Sisires Σισιρης 7
Neferefre Neferefre Khaneferre Name lost 1 (? Kheres Χερης 20
Nyuserre Ini Ini Nyuserre Name lost 10+ Rhathoures Ραθουρης 44
Menkauhor Kaiu Menkauhor Menkauhor Menkauhor 8 Menkheres Μενχερης 9
Djedkare Isesi Isesi Djedkare Maatkare Djedu 28 Tankheres Τανχερης 44
Unas Unis Unis Unis 30 Onnos Οννος 33
102 years + […] Africanus: "248 years", Eusebius: (100)[xxvii]
(actual sum is 218 years)
Africanus: Dyn. I–V, 1294 years
(actual sum is 1281 years)
Eusebius: Dyn. I–V, 1295 years
(actual sum is 1301 years)

Sixth Dynasty

[edit]

By the Fifth Dynasty, the religious institution had established itself as the dominant force in society; a trend of growth in the bureaucracy and the priesthood, and a decline in the pharaoh's power had been established during Neferirkare Kakai's reign. During Djedkare Isesi's rule, officials were endowed with greater authority—evidenced by the opulent private tombs they constructed—eventually leading to the creation of a feudal system in effect. These established trends—decentralization of authority, coupled with growth in bureaucracy—intensified during the three decades of Unas's rule, which also witnessed economic decline.

Proposed dates: c. 2322–2191 BC (131 years),[7] c. 2323–2150 BC (173 years),[146] c. 2300–2181 BC (150 years),[4] c. 2345–2181 BC (164 years),[9] c. 2305–2118 BC (187 years)[133]

  (#)  – Existence disputed

Comparison of royal lists

Historical Pharaoh Karnak Abydos Saqqara Turin King List[63] Manetho
Teti Teti Teti Teti Name lost […], 6m, 21d Othoes Οθοης 30
Userkare Userkare Name lost Lost
Pepi I Meryre Pepi Meryre Pepi Name lost 20 years Phios Φιος 53
Merenre Nemtyemsaf I Merenre Merenre Merenre Name lost 44 years Methusouphis Μεθουσουφις 7
Pepi II Neferkare Neferkare Neferkare Name lost 90+ years Phiops Φιωψ 94
Merenre Nemtyemsaf II Merenre Saemsaf Name lost 1y, 1m Menthesouphis Μενφεσουφις 1
c. 160 years[xxx] Nitokris Νιτωκρις 12
203

According to Africanus, the total sum for the kings of the First through Sixth dynasties amounts to 1497 years, but the actual sum of items gives 1478. Eusebius closely follows Africanus and records 1498 total years, but the actual sum of his numbers is 1504. This may imply that the summation figures are more accurate than the individual reigns.[35]

The Turin King List records a total of 52 kings up to Neferirkare, that is, 45 kings from Menes to Merenre Nemtyemsaf II,[63] although the list includes two fictitious kings in the Fourth Dynasty, thus totaling 43 kings. Africanus records a total of 48 kings, while Eusebius records about 70. This discrepancy is the result of a misunderstanding of the text, as later both Eusebius and Africanus record 192 kings before the Twelfth Dynasty.[35]

First Intermediate Period (c. 2200–2050 BC)

[edit]

The Old Kingdom rapidly collapsed after the death of Pepi II Neferkare, who supposedly reigned up to 94 years, longer than any monarch in history. The latter years of his reign were probably marked by inefficiency because of his advanced age. This was further exacerbated by the 4.2-kiloyear event, a climate shift around 2200 BC which caused widespread desertification and famine.

The kings of the 7th and 8th Dynasties, who represented the successors of the 6th Dynasty, tried to hold onto some power in Memphis but owed much of it to powerful nomarchs. After a couple of decades, they were overthrown by a new line of pharaohs based in Heracleopolis Magna. Some time after these events, a rival line based at Thebes revolted against their Northern overlords and united Upper Egypt. The Theban pharaoh Mentuhotep II, the son and successor of Intef III, defeated the Herakleopolitan pharaohs and reunited the Two Lands, thereby starting the Middle Kingdom.

Seventh and Eighth Dynasties

[edit]

Africanus and Eusebius record 70 kings in 70 days, which is clearly an embellishment.[155] Some historians dismiss the existence of a Seventh Dynasty, while others argue it could correspond to the "lacuna of 6 years" recorded in the Turin King List.[44] The following tables are based on Beckerath 1999, pp. 66–69 & 284, which is itself based on the Abydos King List. The Turin King List only records Netjerkare Siptah and the last 6 names.[63] This line ruled from Memphis, and it is thought that it lasted only about one generation, or about 30 years.[157] Manetho reports 27 kings for the Eighth Dynasty;[155] the number may be a corruption of "17 kings", the total of kings for this line.

The Turin King List records the years from Teti until Neferirkare as 181 years, 6 months, 3 days, with a lacuna of 6 years, totaling 187 years.[xxx] The total from Menes is given as 52 kings amounting to 955 years and 15 days,[63] but the number of years is certainly inflated.[xi] Diodorus Siculus (c. 50 BC), most likely based on a similar tradition, writes that Menes was succeeded by 52 kings that ruled for 1040 years.[41]:45 For the sum of the first eight dynasties, Manetho and Eusebius record 1639 and 1598 years, respectively, but these figures do not match the previous sums.[35]

Ninth and Tenth Dynasties

[edit]

Africanus records 19 kings for 409 years, but only lists one Achthoes, a tyrant who was killed by a crocodile. Meanwhile, Eusebius records 4 kings in 100 years. For the next dynasty, they both record 19 kings for 185 years, but list none.[155] It is possible that the 9th and 10th dynasties were in fact a single dynasty that was duplicated by Manetho (or one of his scribes), resulting in two Heracleopolean dynasties of 19 kings.[161][162][163][164] The Turin King List records an unbroken line of 18 kings, but almost all names, as well as the sum of regnal years, are damaged.[63] A break between dynasties, while still possible, can't be pinpointed with any certainty.

Eleventh Dynasty (Thebes)

[edit]

According to Hornung, the Theban monarchy began no more than 40 years after the fall of the Old Kingdom.[157]

  (#)  – Nomarch of Thebes

Manetho writes:[155]

The Eleventh Dynasty consisted of sixteen kings of Diospolis, who reigned for 43 years. In succession to these, Ammenemes ruled for 16 years.
Here ends the First Book of Manetho. Total for the reigns of 192 kings, 2300 years 70 days.[xxxv]

Middle Kingdom (c. 2050–1800 BC)

[edit]

The kings of the 11th Dynasty ruled from Thebes and the kings of the 12th Dynasty ruled from Itjtawy, near Lisht. The periodization of the Middle Kingdom is somewhat disputed; some authors include only the Eleventh and Twelfth Dynasties,[174][175] while others include the Eleventh, Thirteenth and Fourteenth Dynasties.[146][176]

Egyptian chronology becomes more reliable from this point onward, although dates still differ depending on the author. The reign of Senusret III can securely be dated to the middle of the 19th century BC (c. 1850, ± 25 years), thus dating the beginning of the 12th dynasty to the mid 20th century BC (c. 1950), and the 11th dynasty to the mid 21st century BC (c. 2050 BC). This is supported by radiocarbon dating, which shows that the Middle Kingdom likely began in the range of 2057–2040 BC, with more certainty between 2064 and 2019 BC.[24] The accession of Senusret III is dated to 1884–1860 BC, with more certainty between 1889 and 1836 BC.[24]

Eleventh Dynasty cont.

[edit]

The Turin King List records the duration of the whole dynasty as 143 years, starting with Mentuhotep I, and 70 years starting with Mentuhotep II.[173]

Proposed dates: c. 2046–1995 (51 years),[7] c. 2061–1991 BC (70 years),[146] c. 2046–1976 BC (70 years),[4] c. 2055–1985 BC (70 years),[176] c. 2009–1940 BC (69 years)[133]

  (#)  – Status ambiguous

Twelfth Dynasty

[edit]

Starting from the Twelfth Dynasty, pharaohs often appointed their heirs as co-rulers before their own death. This is one of the main obstacles when reconstructing the chronology of Ancient Egypt. According to radiocarbon dating, the dynasty certainly began between the years 2000 and 1950 BC, perhaps around 1980 BC.[24] The Turin King List gives the sum of years as 213, but does not take co-regencies into account.[62]

Proposed dates: c. 1976–1794/3 BC (182/3 years),[179][174] c. 1991–1783 (208 years),[146] c. 1985–1773 (212 years),[176] c. 1939–1760 BC (179 years)[133]

Manethonian royal lists

Pharaoh Manetho[35] Highest
Year
Years reigned
Africanus & Eusebius Turin Afric. Eus.
1 Amenemhat I Sehetepibre (Ammenemes) Aμμενεμης (not included) 30th 29 (16) (16)
2 Senusret I Kheperkare Sesonkhosis Σεσονχοσις 45th 45 46 46
3 Amenemhat II Nubkaure Ammanemes Aμμανεμης 35th 30+ 38 38
4 Senusret II Khakheperre Sesostris Σεσωστρις 8/9th 19 48 48
5 Senusret III Khakaure Lakhares Λαχαρης Lamaris Λαμαρις 39th 30+ 8 8
6 Amenemhat III Nimaatre Ammeres Aμμερης 46th 40+ 8 42
7 Amenemhat IV Maakherure Ammenemes Aμμενεμης 10th 9 8
8 Sobekneferu Sobekkare Skemiophris Σκεμιoφρις 3th 3 4
Turin total: 213 years, 1 month, 17 days
Turin total minus co-regencies: c. 181 years[62]
Africanus total: 160 years (176 years plus Amenemhat)
Eusebius total: 245 years (actual sum is 182 years, 198 plus Amenemhat)

Second Intermediate Period (c. 1800–1550 BC)

[edit]

Reconstructing the chronology of the Second Intermediate Period is even more difficult than the First, as there are very few and contradictory records. The Turin King List is the only one to include rulers of this period, but it is badly damaged after the Twelfth Dynasty. This period is best known for the rule of the Fifteenth Dynasty established by the Hyksos people of West Asia. It was a time of political rather than social upheavals.[191]

At some point during the weak Thirteenth Dynasty, the provincial ruling family in Xois, located in the Nile Delta, broke away to form Fourteenth Dynasty. Around the same time, the Asiatic people known as the Hyksos established themselves around the Delta, and soon after took control of Avaris (modern Tell el-Dab'a), beginning Fifteenth Dynasty. The Hyksos took over most of Lower Egypt and ended the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Dynasties. They were also known as the "Great Hyksos" because of their dominance.[192] The power vacuum in Upper Egypt enabled the Sixteenth Dynasty to declare independence in Thebes, only to be overrun by the Hyksos shortly thereafter. Subsequently, as the Hyksos withdrew from Upper Egypt, a new native Egyptian house in Thebes set itself up as Seventeenth. This dynasty eventually drove the Hyksos back into Asia, starting the New Kingdom.

Thirteenth Dynasty

[edit]

As opposed to the previous dynasty, there are little to no historical records regarding this dynasty, with only a few kings leaving archeological records. The dynasty possibly originates from Canaan, as some rulers (Sekhemkare, Hotepibre) are called "Asiatics".[193][194] Merneferre Ay, while not the final pharaoh, was the last king attested in Lower and Upper Egypt, later pharaohs are only attested in the south.[195] The earlier part of the dynasty until Ay is sometimes considered part of the Middle kingdom, but more often the whole dynasty is considered part of the Second Intermediate Period.

Manetho records "60 kings of Diospolis for 453 years". Notably, the number of kings appears to be somewhat correct, as the Turin King List records a minimum of 51 kings, which Ryholt rises to 57.[196][195] However, only the first half of the names survives, and the reign lengths are also damaged. Manetho's total of 453 years is sometimes emended as 153, but there is no definitive proof of this.[195] According to radiocarbon dating, the Thirteenth Dynasty began between the years 1800 and 1740 BC.[24] According to Hornung, Ay's reign ended around 1650 BC, at least 100 years after the beginning of the dynasty.[195]

The succession is based on the reconstruction of Kim Ryholt. Almost all kings reigned for a very short time, for about 1 to 3 years each.[197] Ryholt also suggests that the division by Manetho is based not on a familiar break, but because of the rise of the Dynasty XIV.[198] The exact succession of rulers is highly disputed.[199]

Proposed dates: c. 1794/3–1648/5 (146/8 years),[200] c. 1793/73–after 1650/40+ (120+ years),[146][176] c. 1760–1630 BC (130 years),[201] c. 1803–1649 BC (154 years)[202]

  (#)  – Existence disputed

Complete royal list of Dynasty XIII

# Pharaoh (Ryholt)[238][195] Karnak King List Turin King List[203][195] Pharaoh (Beckerath)[239] #
1 Sekhemre Khutawy Amenemhat Sobekhotep I Sekhemre Khutawy Khutawyra 2 years, 3 months, 24 days Wegaf 1
2 Sekhemkare Amenemhat Senebef Sekhemkare Am[…] (?) […] […] years […] lacuna years, 6 years Senebef 2
3 Nerikare Pantjeny 3
4 Sekhemkare Amenemhat V Amenemhat(ra) […] 3–4 years (+ lacuna ?) Amenemhat V 4
5 Ameny Qemau
6 Hotepibre Sehotepibre 1 [year ?] Se-Hotepibre 5
7 Iufni Iufni Lost Iufni 6
8 Seankhibre Amenemhat VI Sankhibre Sankhibre […] and 23 [days] Amenemhat VI 7
9 Semenkare Nebnuni Semenkare […] and 22 [days] Nebnuni 8
10 Sehetepibre Sehotepibre 1+ months and 27 days Sehetepibre 9
11 Sewadjkare Sewadjkare […] and 21+ days Sewadjkare 10
12 Nedjemibre Nedjemibre 0 years, 7 months Nedjemibre 11
13 Khaankhre Sobekhotep II Khaankhra Sobek[hot]ep Lost Sobekhotep I 12
14 Renseneb Ren[se]neb 0 years, 4 months Renseneb 13
15 Awibre Hor Awtibre […] and 7 days

(+ lacuna ?)

Hor I 14
16 Horus-Khabaw
17 Horus-Djedkheperew
18 Seb (may not exist)
19 Kay (may not exist)
20 Sedjefakare Kay Amenemhat VII Sedjefa[…]kare Lost Amenemhat VII 15
21 Khutawyre Wegaf Khutawire Sekhemre Khutawy Sobekhotep Lost Amenemhat Sobekhotep II 16
22 Userkare Khendjer User[ka]re Khendjer Lost Khendjer 17
23 Smenkhkare Imyremeshaw […]kare Imyremeshaw […] and 4 days Smenkhkare 18
24 Sehetepkare Intef IV Intef [Sehotep]ka[ra] Intef […] and 3 days Intef IV 19
25 Seth Meribre [Mer]ib[ra] Seth […] and 6 days Seth 20
26 Sekhemre Sobekhotep III Sekhemkare Sobekhotep 4 years, 2 months, […] days Sobekhotep III 21
27 Khasekhemre Neferhotep I Khasekhemre Khasekhemre Neferhotep 11 years, 1 month, […] days Neferhotep I 22
28 Menwadjre Sihathor Sihathor 1+ months and 3 days Sihathor 23
29 Khaneferre Sobekhotep IV Khaneferre Khaneferre Sobekhotep Lost Sobekhotep IV 24
30 Merhotepre Sobekhotep V Merhotepre Name lost Lost *
31 Khahotepre Sobekhotep VI Khahotepre Khahotepra 4 years, 8 months, 29 days Sobekhotep V 25
32 Wahibre Ibiau Wahibre Jaib 10 years, 8 months, 28 days Ibiau 26
33 Merneferre Ay I Merneferre 23 years, 8 months, 10 days Ay I 27
34 Merhotepre Ini Merhotepra 2 years, 2–4 months, 9 days Sobekhotep VI / Ini ? 28
35 Sankhenre Sewadjtu Sankhenre Sewadjtu 3 years and 2–4 months Sewadjtu 29
36 Mersekhemre Ined Mersekhemre Mersekhemre Ined 3 years, 1 month, 1 [day] Ined / Neferhotep II ? 30
37 Sewadjkare Hori Sewadjkare Hori 5 years, […] and 8 days Hori 31
38 Merkawre Sobekhotep VII Merkaure Merkau[re] Sobek[hotep] 2 years, […] and 4 days Sobekhotep VII 32
39 Name lost […] and 11 days Lost 33
40 Name lost Lost Lost 34
41 Name lost Lost Lost 35
42 Mersekhemre Neferhotep II (position uncertain) Name lost Lost Lost 36
43 Mershepsesre Ini II (position uncertain) Name lost Lost
44 Sewahenre Senebmiu (position uncertain) Sewahenre Name lost Lost Lost 42
45 Name lost Lost Lost 43
46 Mer […]re[…] Lost Lost 45
47 Merkheperre Mer-kheper-Ra Lost Merkheperre 46
48 Merkare Merka[ra] Lost Merkare 47
49 Name lost Lost
50 Sewadjare Mentuhotep V Sewadjare […]dj[…] Lost
51 […]mes[…] Lost Dedumose 37
52 Ibi […]maatre Ibi […] Lost Ibi II 38
53 Hor[…] […]webenre Hor […] Lost Hor II 39
54 Se[…]kare […] Lost Se[…]kare 40
55 Seheqenre Sankhptahi […]qaenre […] Lost Senebmiu 41
56 […]re […] Lost
57 […]enre […] Lost Secha'enre' 44
"[…] (total of 51) kings "[…]

Fourteenth Dynasty (Xois)

[edit]
Drawing of an ancient Egyptian stele depicting Merdjefare, the only king of the 14th dynasty to leave a surviving portrait.

Manetho records "76 kings of Xois for 184 years". Ryholt argues that these kings ruled from Avaris,[240] but there is no strong evidence for this.[241] Almost nothing is known about the dynasty, and all its rulers appear to have had very short reigns. The following is the royal succession according to the Turin King List.[242] The document records a minimum of 51 kings (Ryholt raises the number to 56),[243] many of whom ruled alongside Dynasties XIII and XV. They were also of Near Eastern origin.[244]

Only four rulers are contemporarily attested: Nehesy, Nebsenre, Merdjefare, and Sekheperenre.[245] Beckerath, who mostly agrees with Ryholt, records 16 additional names of disputed identity.[246] This dynasty notably includes some of the shortest recorded reigns; the shortest being that of Sekheperenre (61–65 days), which is also the shortest reign of a native pharaoh.

Proposed dates: unknown–c. 1645,[247] c. 1773–1650 (123 years),[179] c. 1805–1649 (156 years)[202]

Fifteenth Dynasty (Hyksos)

[edit]

The "Hyksos", literally meaning "rulers of foreign lands", were people who emerged from the Fertile Crescent and conquered much of Lower Egypt, as well as parts of Middle Egypt. They were excluded from contemporary Egyptian sources because they were perceived as foreign usurpers. The Turin King List records 6 rulers of foreign lands ruling for roughly 150 years,[xli] but the list is very damaged and much of the information is now lost.[250] Manetho, as quoted by Josephus, reported six "shepherd kings from Phoenicia" ruling for 254 years (the term "shepherd kings" appears to be the result of pronunciation changes).[251] The following is the tentative reconstruction of Kim Ryholt, based on attested names bearing the title of "Hyksos".[252][xlii]

Proposed dates: c. 1648/5–1539/6 BC (109 years),[254] c. 1650–1550 BC (100 years),[179] c. 1649–1532 (117 years),[146] unknown–c. 1530 BC,[201] c. 1649–1540 (109 years),[255]

Reconstructions of Dynasty XV

# Turin King List[250] Manetho[35] Ryholt (1997) Beckerath (1999)[256] Clayton (2001)[257] Bunson (2002)[146] Hornung (2006)[249]
1 Lost Salitis — 13 years Semqen Salitis Sheshi Salitis[192] Sarà-Dagan
2 Lost Beon — 44 years Aperanat Beon Yaqub-Har Sheshi[258] *Bin-'Anu
3 Lost Apachnas — 36y, 7m Khyan Apakhnas Khyan Yaqub-Har[259] ('Apaq-) Hajran
4 Lost — 10+ years Apophis — 61y, 2m Sakir-Har Khyan Apepi I Khyan[260] Jinassi-Ad
5 Lost — 40+ years Iannas — 50y, 1m Apepi Apepi Apepi (II) Apepi[261] Apepi
6 Khamudi […] Assis — 49 years Khamudi Khamudi Khamudi[262] Khamudi

Manetho's Dynasties XV to XVII

Manetho's original[163] Josephus Africanus Eusebius
Dynasty XV 6 shepherd kings 6 shepherd kings, 254 years 6 shepherd kings, 284 years Kings of Thebes, 250 years
Dynasty XVI 32 shepherd kings 32 shepherd kings, 518 years 5 kings of Thebes, 190 years
Dynasty XVII 5 kings of Thebes 43 shepherd & Theban, 151 years [6] shepherd kings, 103 years
Total 43 shepherds & Theban Total: 511 years Total: 953 years Total: 543 years

The versions of Manetho differ significantly for this period. Eusebius notably places the rulers of Africanus' Dynasty XV to Dynasty XVII, likely to accommodate his Biblical chronology. According to Josephus, the Hyksos domination, that is, the period between Dynasties XV until the end of Dynasty XVII, lasted 511 years, while Africanus attributes 518 years to Dynasty XVI alone.[187][35] This is likely the summation of all three dynasties, because Josephus' sum of reigns for the Hyksos dynasty is actually 253 years and 10 months. This figure must be a century off, as the Turin King List only notes about 150 years.

Sixteenth Dynasty (Thebes)

[edit]

According to Beckerath, the rulers of Dynasty XVI were vassals of the Hyksos.[263] According to Ryholt, the 16th dynasty, ruling from Thebes, consisted of 15 kings recorded in the Turin King List, although most names are lost.[231][250] Ryholt reconstruction has been criticized and it is not universally accepted.[264][265] Virtually nothing is known about these rulers.

Proposed dates: c. 1640–1532 BC (108 years),[146] c. 1650–1580 BC (70 years),[179] c. 1649–1582 BC (67 years)[255]

Reconstructions for Dynasty XVI

# Ryholt[231] Schneider[266] Karnak King List Turin King List
1 Name lost Sekhemraneferkhau Wepwawetemsaf Name lost
2 Sekhemre Sementawy Djehuty Sekhemre Sementawy Sekhemre […] 3 years […]
3 Sekhemre Seusertawy Sobekhotep VIII Seusertawy Sekhemre […] 16 [years] […]
4 Sekhemre Sankhtawy Neferhotep III Sekhemre S[…] 1 year […]
5 Seankhenre Mentuhotepi Se[…]en[…]re […] 1 year […]
6 Sewadjenre Nebiryraw I Sewadjenre Nebiriawre 26 years […]
7 Nebiryraw II Nebitawre […] Lost
8 Semenre Semenre Lost
9 Seuserenre Bebiankh Seuserenre Seuserenre 12 years […]
10 Sekhemre Shedwaset Sekhemre Sekhemre Shedwaset Lost
11 Djedhotepre Dedumose I (uncertain) Sekhemre Wadjkhaw Sobekemsaf I […]re Lost
12 Djedneferre Dedumose II (uncertain) Sekhemre-Wepmaat Intef Lost
13 Djedankhre Montemsaf (uncertain) Sekhemre-Heruhirmaat Intef […]re […] Lost
14 Merankhre Mentuhotep VI (uncertain) Nubkheperre Intef Lost
15 Seneferibre Senusret IV (uncertain) Sekhemre Wahkhau Rahotep Lost
Total: [1]5 kings […]

Beckerath's Dynasty XVI[263]

Name
'Anat-Har Yaqub-Har Anati Nubankhre Wazad Hibe
'Aper-'Anati Jamu Bebnum Nikare II Qur Aped
Semqen Jakebmu Nebmaatre […]kare Shenes Hapi
Sakir-Har Amu Aahotepre […]kare Inek Shemsu
Apepi Sneferankhre Anetjerire […]kare 'A[…] Meni[…]
Maaibre Sheshi Hepu Meribre Sharek 'Ap[epi] Werqa

Abydos Dynasty

[edit]

The Turin King List records sixteen names after the Dynasty XVI, but the names do not match those of Dynasty XVII and thus likely refer to a different line. This dynasty is hypothesized by Kim Ryholt to have been a short-lived local line contemporaneous with the other dynasties.[267][250] This has not been accepted by all scholars.[268]

The Turin King List ends here, recording a total of 223 kings. According to the reconstructions used here, the original Egyptian annals recorded roughly 243 kings until this point (and 270 up to Ramesses II). The whole section after Dynasty XVI is badly damaged, and thus Ryholt's reconstruction can't be proven with certainty. The total for Dynasty I–XVI thus amounts to 227 kings for a period of 1+12 millennia.

Seventeenth Dynasty (Thebes)

[edit]

The succession of the last three kings of the Seventeenth Dynasty is attested in the Tomb of Khabekhnet and Table of Qenhirkhopshef, but the placement of the previous ruler is problematic. The Karnak King List includes the throne names of Sekhemre Wahkhau Rahotep, Sobekemsaf I, and Nubkheperre Intef, but they are not in order. These Theban kings ruled an area from Elephantine to Abydos.[274] They likely began as minor vassals of the Hyksos, as their origins are very obscure. The last kings fought and defeated the Hyksos, and established the New Kingdom of Egypt.

Kyholt identified 9 kings of this line, although the exact order is uncertain. Beckerath included 6 additional names belonging to kings that Ryholt placed on the previous dynasties (Sekhemre Sementawy Djehuty, Seankhenre Mentuhotepi, Nebiryraw I, Nebiryraw II, Semenre, and Bebiankh).[275] Hornung postulates that the rulers between Dynasties XIII and XVIII ruled for roughly a century.[276]

Proposed dates: c. 1645–1550 BC (95 years),[277] c. 1640–1550 BC (90 years),[146] c. 1580–1550 BC (30 years)[179][255]

New Kingdom (c. 1550–1075 BC)

[edit]

The New Kingdom is considered the greatest period in Egyptian history. It began with the expulsion of the Hyksos, and it saw Egypt's greatest territorial extent. The Egyptians expanded far into Nubia in the south, and held wide territories in the Near East. Three of the best-known pharaohs originate from this period. These are Akhenaten, whose exclusive worship of the Aten is often interpreted as the first instance of monotheism, Tutankhamun, known for the discovery of his nearly intact tomb, and Ramesses II the Great, who attempted to recover the territories in the Levant that had been held in the Eighteenth Dynasty. His reconquest led to the Battle of Kadesh, where he led the Egyptian armies against the Hittite king Muwatalli II. The ensuing Egyptian–Hittite peace treaty is the oldest of its kind.

The accession of Ahmose I and the beginning of the New Kingdom can be securely dated to c. 1550 BC (± 10 years), which is also the date adopted by most scholars. Radiocarbon studies have yielded two intervals for Ahmose's date of accession: 1570–1544 BC[24] and 1564–1528 BC.[25] While most scholars use Shaw's figure of c. 1550 BC, Hornung argues in favor of an slightly later date, c. 1540 BC. Many of the reign lengths given by Manetho, as preserved by Josephus, appear to be confirmed by contemporary sources. The years are mostly derived only from the highest known year of each pharaoh, meaning that there is still some uncertainty on their exactitude.[286]

Eighteenth Dynasty

[edit]

The Eighteenth dynasty lasted roughly 250 years and was the longest-reigning native Egyptian dynasty.[xliii] It started as a continuation of the Seventeen dynasty, with Ahmose I being the brother of Kamose. However, the death of Amenhotep I without known children ended the male line, bringing the common-born Thutmose I to the throne. Thutmose probably married into the royal family by marrying two presumed daughters of Ahmose I, Ahmose and Mutnofret.[287][288] If the identification of Mutnofret as a child of Ahmose is correct, that would mean that–via her issue–the family composed of members of the Seventeenth and Eighteenth dynasties ruled Egypt for nearly three centuries, until Tutankhamun's death.

Proposed dates: 1550–1307 BC (243 years),[146] 1550–1295 BC (255 years),[289] 1550–1292 BC (258 years),[4][277] 1539–1292 BC (247 years).[286] Regnal years may still be off by one or two years at most.[286]

Comparison of Manethonian royal lists

Pharaoh and years Josephus Africanus Eusebius
Ahmose I ~25 (1st) Tethmosis Τεθμωσις 25y 4m (1st) Amos Aμως 25 (1st) Amosis Aμωσις 25
Amenhotep I ~20 (2nd) Chebron Χεβρων 13y (2nd) Chebros Χεβρως 13 (2nd) Chebron Χεβρων 13
Thutmose I ~10 (3rd) Amenophis Aμενωφις 20y 7m (3rd) Amenophthis Αμενωφθις 24 (3rd) Ammenophis Aμμενωφίς 21
Thutmose II ~2 (4th) Amesses♀ Aμεσσης 21y 9m (4th) Amensis Αμενσις 22 (4th) Miphres Μιφρης 12
Hatshepsut ~21 (5th) Mephres Μηφρης 12y 9m (5th) Misaphris Μισαφρις 13
Sum of years: ~78 years (Sum: 91 years, 5 months)[xlviii] Sum: 69 years Sum: 71 years
Thutmose III 32y 1m (6) Mephramouthosis Μηφραμουθωσις 25y 10m (6) Misphragmuthosis Μισφραγμουθωσις 26 (5) Myspharmuthosis Μισφραγμουθωσις 26
Amenhotep II ~25 (7) Thmosis Θμωσις 9y 8m (7) Touthmosis Τουθμωσις 9 (6) Touthmosis Τουθμωσις 9
Thutmose IV ~10 (8) Amenophis Aμένωφις 30y 10m (8) Amenophis Αμενωφις 31 (7) Amenophis Aμενωφις 31
Amenhotep III ~37 (9) Oros Ωρος 36y 5m (9) Oros Ωρος 37 (8) Oros Ωρος 36
Akhenaten 16y 10m (10) Akenkheres♀ Aκεγχερης 12y 1m (10) Akherres Αχερρης 32 (9) Akhenkherses Aχενχερσης 12
Smenkhkare ~2 (11) Rhathotis Pαθωτις 9y (11) Rathos Ραθως 6 (10) Athoris Aθωρις 39
Neferneferuaten ~1 (12) Akenkheres Aκεγχηρης 12y 5m (12) Chebres Χεβρης 12 (11) Khenkheres Χενχερης 16
Tutankhamun ~9 (13) Akenkheres Aκεγχηρης 12y 3m (13) Akherres Aχερρης 12 (12) Akherres Aχερρης 8
Ay II ~3 (13) Kherres Χερρης 15
Horemheb ~27 (14) Armais Aρμαις 4y 1m (14) Armesis Aρμεσης 5 (14) Armais Aρμαις 5
Sum of years: ~240 years (Sum: 246 years) (15) Ramesses Ραμεσσης 19 (15) Rhamesses Ραμεσσης 68
Ramesses I ~1 (1st) Rhamesses Pαμεσσης 1y 4m (16) Amenophath Αμενωφαθ 19 (16) Ammenophis Aμμενωφις 40
Ramesses II 66y 2m (2nd) Armesses Miamun Aρμεσσης Μιαμουν 66y 2m Sum: 263 years Sum: 348 years

Reconstructed regnal list of Manetho[319][286][320][187]

# Historical Pharaoh Manetho
1 Ahmose I ~25 (1st) Amosis Aμωσις 25y 4m
2 Amenhotep I ~20 (3th) Amenophis Aμενωφις 20y 7m
3 Thutmose I Kheperen ~10 (5th) Mephres[xlix] Μηφρης 12y 9m
4 Thutmose II Kheperen ~3 (2nd) Chebron[xlix] Χεβρων 13y
5 Hatshepsut 21y 9m (4th) Amesses♀ Aμεσσης 21y 9m
6 Thutmose III Menkheperre 32y 1m (6th) Mephramouthosis[xlix] Μηφραμουθωσις (8th) 30y 10m
7 Amenhotep II ~25 (8th) Amenophis Aμένωφις (6th) 25y 10m
8 Thutmose IV ~10 (7th) Thmosis Θμωσις (7th) 9y 8m
9 Amenhotep III ~37 (9th) Oros Ωρος (9th) 36y 5m
10 Akhenaten 16y 10m (12th) Akenkheres Aκεγχηρης 12y 5m
11 Smenkhkare ~2 (13th) Akenkheres Aκεγχηρης 12y 3m
12 Neferneferuaten ~2 (10th) Akenkheres♀ Aκεγχερης 12y 1m
13 Tutankhamun ~9 (11th) Rhathotis Pαθωτις 9y
14 Ay II ~3 (14th) Armais Aρμαις 4y 1m
15 Horemheb ~27
~245 246 years

Despite being the best-documented period in Egypt's history, almost all of Manetho's names and reign lengths were mixed. His sources were likely already corrupted due to the damnatio memoriae imposed ove the Amarna rulers, and co-regency may have caused additional confusion. The period c. 1540–1292 BC spans 248 years; the sum of estimates reigns amounts to a minimum of 245 years, which closely matches Josephus' sum of 246 years.

Nineteenth Dynasty (Ramesside)

[edit]

The Nineteenth Dynasty ruled from approximately 1292 to 1190 BC and includes one of the most famous pharaohs: Ramesses the Great.

Manethonian royal lists

# Pharaoh and years Josephus Africanus Eusebius
1 Ramesses I ~1 Rhamesses Pαμεσσης 1y 4m Sethos Σεθως 51 Sethos Σεθως 55
2 Seti I ~11 Rapsakes Ραψακης 61 Rampses Ραμψης 66
3 Ramesses II Meryamun 66y 2m Armesses Miamun Aρμεσσης Μιαμουν 66y 2m Amenephthes Aμενεφθης 20 Ammenephthis Aμμενεφθίς 40
4 Merneptah 9 Amenophis Aμενωφις 19y 6m Ramesses Ραψακης 60
5 Seti II 5 Sethos Σεθως 59y Ammenemnes Aμμενεμνης 5 Ammenemes Aμμενεμης 26
6 (Amenmesse) (3) Thouoris Θουωρις 7 Thouoris Θουωρις 7
7 Siptah & Tausret 7 Total of years: 209 (sum is 204) Total of years: 194 years
Total of years: ~102 years[lvii]

Here ends the Second Book of Manetho, which records 96 kings, ruling for 2121 years according to Africanus (92 kings in 1121 years according to Eusebius). However, the correct sum of Africanus' dynasties comes to a puzzling 246 kings for 2221 years.[35][187] The reconstructed chronology for Dynasties XII to XIX shows that about 190 kings ruled for roughly 560 years.

Twentieth Dynasty (Ramesside)

[edit]

The Twentieth Dynasty ruled from roughly 1190 to 1077 BC.[290] Shaw dated the dynasty to 1186–1069 BC.[338]

  (#)  – Existence disputed

For the Twentieth Dynasty, Africanus records 12 kings ruling for 135 years. This actually coincides perfectly with the period between Merneptah (1213 BC) and Ramesses XI (1078 BC).[286] The sum of reigns is roughly 110 years.

Third Intermediate Period (c. 1075–664 BC)

[edit]

Following the Late Bronze Age collapse, the Egyptian Empire collapsed and fragmented once more. The rulers of the Twenty-first Dynasty claimed to rule over all of Egypt, but in practice their influence was limited to Lower Egypt, with the High Priests of Amun ruling over Upper Egypt. The Twenty-second Dynasty maintained control over Egypt for a few decades, but their power soon deteriorated due to infighting. This led to the rise of several competing royal lines in Thebes, Heracleopolis, Hermopolis, Leontopolis, and Tanis, which are collectively known as the Twenty-third Dynasty. Another short-lived line, from Sais, is referred to as the Twenty-fourth Dynasty.

The fragmentation of Egypt came to an end with the arrival of the Nubian kings of Kush, who conquered Egypt c. 745 BC . This was the first time all of Egypt was ruled by foreigners (the Hyksos mostly ruled in Lower Upper), although the Nubians were highly Egyptianized and considered themselves legitimate pharaohs, even reviving the tradition of pyramid building (the last pyramid was built by Ahmose I nearly 800 years before).

While not as chaotic as the previous two intermediate periods, the lack of official king lists makes it difficult to reconstruct the exact succession of rulers. The only surviving king list is that of Manetho, which is likely based on a biased source dated to the Kushite period.[344] Note that the sum of items does not match the stated total of years.[35]

Manetho's Dynasties XXI to XXV

Dynasty XXI Dynasty XXII Dynasty XXIII Dynasty XXIV & XXV
7 kings of Tanis, 130 years
  • Smendes, 26 years.
  • Psousennes,⁠ 41 years.
  • Nephelkheres, 4 years.
  • Amenophthis, 9 years.
  • Osokhor, 6 years.
  • Psinakhes, 9 years
  • Psousennes, 35 years.
9 kings of Bubastus, 120 years
  • Sesônchis, 21 years.
  • Osorthôn,⁠ 15 years.
  • Three kings, 25 years.
  • Takelôthis, 13 years.
  • Three kings, 42 years.
4 kings of Tanis, 120 years
  • Petoubatēs, 40 years
  • Osorkhō, 8 years
  • Psammous, 10 years.
  • Zēt, 31 years.
1 king of Sais
  • Bokhkhoris, 6 years.
3 kings of Ethiopia, 40 years
  • Sabakon, 8 years
  • Sebikhos, 14 years
  • Tarkos, 18 years

Twenty-first Dynasty (Tanis)

[edit]

Most scholars date the 21st dynasty to c. 1070–945 BC;[345][7][4][346] Ian Shaw dates it to c. 1069–945 BC.[347] The native Egyptian names are given in small italics.

High Priests of Amun

[edit]

The High Priests of Amun at Thebes were the de facto rulers of Upper Egypt during the Twenty-first dynasty, writing their names in cartouches, being buried in royal tombs, and passing their office to their sons. They likely did not consider themselves actual pharaohs, but their use of royal titles implied an equivalent level of authority. Dates are taken from Payraudeau (2020),[359] which may not perfectly align with Hornung's. There is insufficient evidence to reconstruct a reliable chronology of these rulers.[360]

  (#)  – only ever High Priest of Amun
  (#)  – Existence disputed

Twenty-second Dynasty (Libyan)

[edit]

The succession of kings of this dynasty is highly disputed; the following reconstruction is mostly based on Hornung, but dates follow Frédéric Payraudeau (2020).[lxvii] Other scholars date the dynasty c. 945–715 BC, after Shaw.[376][146][377] Despite the political turmoil of this period, this dynasty managed to last for roughly 200 years, being exceeded only by the Thutmoside and Ptolemaic dynasties.

  (#)  – Status ambiguous

The exact succession of rulers during the period of Dynasties 22 and 23 is highly disputed:

Comparison of modern regnal lists

Kitchen 1972[377] Beckerath 1999[375] Shaw 2000[376] London 2000[4] Mladjov 2021[388]
Dynasty 22
  1. Shoshenq I 945–924
  2. Osorkon I 924–889
  3. Shoshenq II 890
  4. Takeloth I 889–874
  5. Osorkon II 874–850
  6. Harsiese 870–860
  7. Takeloth II 850–825
  8. Shoshenq III 825–773
  9. Pimay 773–767
  10. Shoshenq V 767–730
  11. Osorkon IV 730–715/3
Dynasty 23
  1. Pedubast I 818–793
  2. Iuput I 804–803
  3. Shoshenq IV 793–787
  4. Osorkon III 787–759
  5. Takelot III 764–757
  6. Rudamun 757–754
  7. Iuput II 754–720
  8. Shoshenq VI (??)
Dynasty 22
  1. Shoshenq I 945–924
  2. Osorkon I 924–890
  3. Takelot I 890–877
  4. Shoshenq II 877–775
  5. Osorkon II 875–837
  6. Shoshenq III 837–798/5
  7. Shoshenq IIIa 798–785
  8. Pami 785–774
  9. Shoshenq V 774–736

Upper Egyptian line

  1. Takelot II 841–816
  2. Pedubast I 830–805/00
  3. Iuput I, 816–800
  4. Shoshenq IV 805/0–790
  5. Osorkon III, 790–762
  6. Takelot III, 767–755
  7. Rudamun, 755–735
  8. Ini 735–730

Unplaced

Shoshenq, Harsiese,
Shepenupet (?, Shoshenq VI (?

Dynasty 23
  1. Pedubast I 756–730
  2. Osorkon IV 730–722
  3. Psammus? 722–712 (?)
Dynasty 22
  1. Shoshenq I 945–
  2. Osorkon I
  3. Takelot I
  4. Osorkon II
  5. Takelot II
  6. Shoshenq III
  7. Pimay
  8. Shoshenq V
  9. Osorkon IV −715
Dynasty 23
  1. Pedubast I 818–
  2. Iuput I
  3. Shoshenq IV
  4. Osorkon III
  5. Takelot III
  6. Rudamun
  7. Peftjauawybast
  8. Iuput II −715
Dynasty 22
  1. Shoshenq I 945–924
  2. Osorkon I 924–890
  3. Takelot I 890–877
  4. Shoshenq II 877–875
  5. Osorkon II 875–837
  6. Shoshenq III 837–798/5
  7. Shoshenq IIIa 798–785
  8. Pami 785–774
  9. Shoshenq V *774–736

Upper Egyptian line

  1. Horsiese 870–850
  2. Takelot II 841–816
  3. Padibast 830–80/800
  4. Iuput I 816–800
  5. Shoshenq VI 805/0–790
  6. Osorkon III, 790–762
  7. Takelot III, 767–755
  8. Rudamun, 755–735
  9. Ini, 735–730
Dynasty 23
  1. Pedubast II 756–730
  2. Iuput II 756–724
  3. Osorkon IV 730–722
  4. Psammus? 722–712
Dynasty 22
  1. Shoshenq I 943–922
  2. Osorkon II 922–889
  3. Takelot I 889–876
  4. Osorkon III 876–841
  5. Harsiese 873
  6. Shoshenq II *865
  7. Shoshenq III 841–803
  8. Shoshenq V 799–790
  9. Pami 790–782
  10. Shoshenq VI 782–746

Kings in Upper Egypt

  1. Takelot II 845–820
  2. Iuput I 820–809
  3. Osorkon IV 800–773
  4. Takelot III 773–763
  5. Rudamun 763–755
  6. Ini 775–750

Rival line

  1. Pedubast I 834–812
  2. Shoshenq IV 809–806
Dynasty 23 at Memphis
  1. Pedubast II 774–
  2. Osorkon V
  3. Pami
    • (to Dyn. XXIV/XXV?)
  4. Gemenefkhonsbak
  5. Pedubast II

Lentopolis

  1. Iuput II
  2. Penamun
  3. Wenamun
    • (to Dyn. XXVI)

Heracleopolis

  1. Peftjauawybast
    • (to Dyn. XXVI)

Hermopolis

  1. Nimlot I
  2. Djehutyemhat
    • (to Dyn. XXV?)
  3. Nimlot II
  4. Pedinemty
    • (to Dyn. XXVI)
Bunson 2002[345] Hornung 2006[374] Krauss 2007[290] Lloyd 2010[389]
Dynasty 22
  1. Shoshenq I 945–924
  2. Osorkon I 924–909
  3. Takelot I 909–883
  4. Shoshenq II 883
  5. Osorkon II 883–855
  6. Takelot II 860–835
  7. Shoshenq III 835–783
  8. Pami 783–773
  9. Shoshenq V 773–735
  10. Osorkon IV 735–712
Dynasty 23
  1. Pedubast I 828–803
  2. Iuput I
  3. Shoshenq IV
  4. Osorkon III 777–749
  5. Takelot III
  6. Rudamun
  7. Iuput II
  8. Nimlot
  9. Peftjauawybast 740–25
Dynasty 22
  1. Shoshenq I
  2. Osorkon I
  3. Shoshenq (II)
  4. Shoshenq (IIb)
  5. Takelot I
  6. Osorkon II
  7. Shoshenq III
  8. Shoshenq IIIb (IV)
  9. Pami
  10. Shoshenq V
Dyn. 23 (UE) and rivals
  1. Takelot II
  2. Iuput I
  3. Osorkon III
  4. Takelot III
  5. Pedubast I
  6. Shoshenq VI
  7. Rudamun
  8. Ini

Lower Egypt

  1. Pedubast I (?) c. 730
  2. Osorkon IV
Dynasty 22
  1. Shoshenq I 943–923
  2. Osorkon I 922–888
  3. Takelot I 887–874
  4. Shoshenq II 873
  5. Osorkon II 872–842
  6. Takelot II 845–821
  7. Shoshenq III 841–789
  8. Pami 790–784
  9. Shoshenq V 783–746
Dynasty 22
  1. Shoshenq I 945–939
  2. Osorkon I 924–889
  3. Shoshenq IIa
  4. Shoshenq IIb
  5. Shoshenq IIIc
  6. Takeloth I 887–874
  7. Osorkon II 874–835
  8. Shoshenq III 835–797
  9. Shoshenq IIIa 797–783
  10. Pimay 783–776
  11. Shoshenq V 776–739

Graphic list of the various rival dynasties (c. 880–650 BC)

Lower Egypt Upper Egypt
Rival lines Tanis Thebes Rival lines
Twenty-second Dynasty

Takelot I
887–873 BC (?)

Shoshenq II*
873–865 BC (?)
Theban 23rd Dyn.
Harsiese
870–860 BC
Osorkon II
865–830 BC
Shoshenq III
830–791 BC
Takelot II
834–809 BC
Pedubast I
822–799 BC
Iuput I
809–798 BC
Shoshenq III
798–791 BC
Shoshenq VI
799–793 BC
Shoshenq IV
791–778 BC
Osorkon III
791–764 BC
Pami
778–769 BC
Shoshenq V
769–731 BC
Takelot III
764–756 BC
Rudamun
756–750 BC
Ini
750–745 BC (?)
Peftjauawybast (Herac.)
750–720 BC
Twenty-fifth Dynasty

Piye
743–715 BC

Djehutyemhat (Hermo.)
745–735 BC
Nimlot (Hermo.)
735–725 BC
Iuput II (Leon.)
735–715 BC
Tanite 23rd Dynasty
Pedubast II
730–725 BC
Piye
720–715 BC
Twenty-fourth Dynasty
Tefnakht I (Sais)
726–718 BC
Osorkon IV
725–716 BC
Bakenranef (Sais/Tanis)
718–712 BC
Shebitku
714–705 BC
Pami II
712–702 BC
Shabaka
705–690 BC
Egypt unified by the Twenty-fifth Dynasty
Gemenefkhonsbak,
Sekhemkare/Pedubast III
(ephemeral rebels)
Taharqa
690–664 BC
Necho I (Sais)
?–664 BC
Psamtik I (Sais)
664–610 BC
Tantamani
664–656 BC
Egypt unified by the Twenty-sixth Dynasty

Twenty-third Dynasty (Libyan)

[edit]

The designation "Twenty-Third Dynasty" is applied variously by scholars to branches of the Twenty-Second Dynasty ruling in mostly Upper Egypt (at least intermittently at Thebes), to various local rulers based at Heracleopolis Magna, Hermopolis, Leontopolis, and to a line of kings who succeeded the Twenty-Second Dynasty at Tanis, all of Libyan origin. The following is the most recent reconstruction by Frédéric Payraudeau (2020). There are roughly 20 kings attested around this period, but this may vary significantly depending on the author (compare the lists given above). See also the discussion of David Aston[390] and Karl Jansen-Winkeln.[391]

  (#)  – Existence disputed

Rulers of Thebes[392]

Rulers of Heracleopolis[400]

Rulers of Hermopolis[402]

Rulers of Leontopolis[406]

Rulers of Tanis[408]

This is the line recognized by Manetho as the legitimate successors of the 22nd dynasty.

Twenty-fourth Dynasty (1st Saite)

[edit]

This was a short-lived dynasty located in the western Delta, at Sais. It was actually a vassal of the 25th dynasty.

Proposed dates: c. 740–712 BC (28 years);[413] c. 736–723 BC (13 years),[290][374] c. 727–715 BC (12 years).[376] c. 727–713 BC (14 years).[414]

Twenty-fifth Dynasty (Nubian)

[edit]

Following the collapse of the New Kingdom, the Nubians, a people located around Southern Egypt, founded the Kingdom of Kush. One of its rulers, Piye, invaded Lower Egypt and took the title of pharaoh, although the Nubians already controlled Upper Egypt in the early years of his reign. Kashta, Piye's father, is sometimes also listed as part of the dynasty. The capital during this dynasty was Memphis.

Manetho claims that the 25th Dynasty ruled for 40 years, but this is about half of its actual duration. This dynasty is also mentioned by Herodotus, who records "eighteen Ethiopian kings", and by Diodorus Siculus, who writes that "four Ethiopians held the throne, not consecutively but with intervals between, for a little less than thirty-six years in all."[39]:100[41]:44 The accession of Taharqa can be securely dated to 690 BC, marking the first certain year in Egyptian history according to Hornung.[374] Dates follow Payraudeau.[359]

Proposed dates: c. 753–655 BC (98 years),[374] c. 747–656 BC (91 years),[376][414] c. 746–655 BC (91 years);[413]

Proto-Saite Dynasty

[edit]

While modern scholars recognize Psamtik I as the founder of the 26th Dynasty, Manetho records four kings before him. They likely correspond to local rulers and Nubian/Assyrian vassals.

  (#)  – Status ambiguous

Uncertain position

Late period (664–332 BC)

[edit]

The Twenty-fifth Dynasty ended after the Assyrian conquest of Egypt. In 671 BC, Memphis, the capital of the first dynasties, was plundered by Esarhaddon, and the sack of Thebes followed a few years later. Despite this, a new dynasty, the Twenty-sixth, managed to restore Egypt's influence in the region and repelled the Assyrians and Babylonians. Still, they all eventually fell to the Achaemenid Persians, who became the Twenty-seventh Dynasty in 525 BC. Persian rule was interrupted by three short-lived dynasties (the 28th, 29th, and 30th) ruling for six decades, between 404 and 342 BC. The first one was founded by Amyrtaeus, and the last one ended with Nectanebo II, the last native ruler of Egypt until the 20th century.

The chronology starting from Taharqa, the penultimate Nubian king, can be fixed thanks to the Canon of Kings of Ptolemy, which is itself based on ancient Babylonian sources and fits perfectly with Manetho's reign lengths. The only period with disputed chronology is the restored native Egyptian rule between the 27th and 31st Dynasties; all other dates are fixed.

Twenty-sixth Dynasty (Saite)

[edit]

The 26th Dynasty was the last great native Egyptian dynasty and ruled from 664 to 525 BC. Many of these pharaohs are better known by their Hellenized names; native Egyptian names are given in small italics.

Twenty-seventh Dynasty (Achaemenid)

[edit]

The first Persian domination lasted from 525 to 404 BC.

  (#)  – Regent
  (#)  – Rebel

Rebels against Persian rule

Twenty-eighth Dynasty

[edit]

The Twenty-eighth Dynasty lasted roughly 6 years and consisted of a single pharaoh:

Twenty-ninth Dynasty

[edit]

The Twenty-ninth Dynasty ruled from 399/8 to 380 BC:

  (#)  – Existence disputed

Thirtieth Dynasty

[edit]

The Thirtieth Dynasty was the last native Egyptian dynasty and lasted from c. 380 to 342 BC.

Thirty-first Dynasty (2nd Achaemenid)

[edit]

The second Persian domination lasted from 342 to 332 BC.

  (#)  – Rebel

Rebels against Persian rule

Hellenistic period (332–30 BC)

[edit]

The Macedonians (Greeks) under Alexander the Great ushered in the Hellenistic period with his conquest of Persia and Egypt in 332 BC, creating one of the largest empires in history. However, this empire quickly fragmented after his sudden death in 323 BC, which led to the chaotic Wars of the Diadochi. Ptolemy, one of Alexander's generals, claimed the pharaonic titles and established the Ptolemaic Kingdom, the last and longest-reigning dynasty of Egypt. The former Persian territories were absorbed into the Hellenic Seleucid Empire, which bordered Egypt to the East. Both states would eventually fall to the Roman Republic over the course of the 1st century BC.

Thirty-second Dynasty (Argead)

[edit]

The Argeads ruled Egypt from 332 to 305 BC. Like their predecessors, the Hellenistic rulers used the Sa-Ra title (nomen) to display their Egyptized personal names.

Thirty-third Dynasty (Ptolemaic)

[edit]

The second Hellenistic dynasty, the Ptolemaic, ruled Egypt for nearly 275 years, from 305/4 BC to 30 BC. It was the longest-reigning dynasty of Egypt, followed closely by the Eighteenth. The most famous member of this dynasty was Cleopatra VII, better known simply as Cleopatra, who was successively the lover of Julius Caesar and, after his death, of Mark Antony, having children with both of them. She strove to create a dynastic and political union with Rome, but the assassination of Caesar and the defeat of Antony doomed their plans. Egypt was ultimately conquered by the Romans under Octavian, who would become the Roman emperor Augustus. All members of the Ptolemaic dynasty shared the same names, but adopted one or several Greek epithets on accession. Regnal numbers are only a modern convention.

  (#)  – Minor co-regent
  (#)  – Status ambiguous
  (#)  – Rebel

Native rebellions
The following rebellions took place in Upper Egypt and were centered in Thebes.

Possible female rulers
The following queens, otherwise referred to just as consorts, are considered pharaohs by Sally-Ann Ashton:[514]

Rome

[edit]
Egyptian relief depicting the Roman emperor Trajan (right, r.  98–117 AD) in full pharaonic style.

Egypt became a client kingdom of Rome in the reign of Ptolemy X Alexander I (r.  107–88 BC)[520] but it was not until the death of Cleopatra (and defeat of Mark Antony) in 30 BC, that Egypt became a Roman province. The Roman emperors were accorded the title of pharaoh by the Egyptians, but the title was not acknowledged outside the province. The last Roman emperor known from a pharaonic titulary is Maximinus Daza (r.  310–313 AD). Royal cartouches are attested as late as 340 AD, but the pagan Egyptians chose to posthumously use cartouches of Diocletian (r.  284–305 AD) rather than acknowledging the later Christian emperors.[521] This was around the same time that the knowledge and understanding of hieroglyphs began to be forgotten; the last known inscription of its kind, known as the Graffito of Esmet-Akhom, dates to the year 394.

Roman rule in Egypt continued almost uninterrupted until the 7th century, when the province fell to the Arab conquest, whereafter Egypt was ruled by the successive caliphates.

See also

[edit]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Theologist Christine Tetley used her own reconstruction of the Royal Annals to establish an alternative chronology that places Narmer's accession c. 3389 BC. She disregards conventional chronology and, especially for the later dynasties, relies heavily on Biblical accounts.[11]
  2. ^ A 2013 study placed the accession of Aha, the second pharaoh, most likely between 3111 and 3045 BC (with 68% confidence), with a broader range of 3218 to 3035 BC (with 95% confidence).[14] However, radiocarbon dating only gives broad approximations subject to several external factors. For instance, while the aforementioned study placed Den in the range of 2945–2904 BC, a 2023 study placed his accession earlier, in the range of 3011–2921 BC, nearly a century earlier.[15]
  3. ^ The 7th year of Sensuret III would be 1830 BC if the astronomical observation was made at Elephantine.[18] According to one independent study, the date should be 1840 BC,[19] or, according to another, 1879 BC.[20] Others have even proposed 1980 BC.[21] It has been argued that Sothic dates should not be consulted in the first place given their lack of certainty.[22]
  4. ^ According to radiocarbon dating, Senusret III became king c. 1890–1830 (with more possibility c. 1880–1860),[23] while two studies have dated the accession of Ahmose I, predecessor of Amenhotep, c. 1570–1544 (possibly c. 1566–1552)[24] or c. 1564–1528 (possibly c. 1557–1537).[25] A recent independent study has proposed Year 1 of Ramesses II as 1297 BC, slightly earlier than the current consensus of 1279 BC.[26]
  5. ^ During the Middle Kingdom, "Year 1" began on the same day as a pharaoh's accession, but "Year 2" began on New Year's Day (I Akhet, day 1). This system was changed in the New Kingdom, where "Year 2" began on the actual anniversary of the pharaoh, but reverted back in the Late Period.[27]
  6. ^ Some authors have questioned the chronological placement of Manetho: he is not mentioned by any author before Josephus, and his negative depiction of the Hyksos could be interpreted as antisemitism, which did not exist during Ptolemaic times.[32] This view is not commonly accepted; the identification of the Hyksos as Jews, while treated as fact by Josephus, was most likely not present in Manetho's original work.[33] One papyrus dated to 241/0 BC mentions one "Manetho" that possibly corresponds to the Egyptian historian.[34]
  7. ^ For Dynasty II, Africanus and Eusebius record 9 kings, but only Africanus provides all names. Similarly, Africanus records 8 kings for Dynasty III, while Eusebius records 17 and names only one. Africanus records all 9 kings of the Dynasty V, but Eusebius records 31 kings and lists two names that are actually copied from the Sixth Dynasty. The 12th dynasty is also preserved only by Africanus.[35]
  8. ^ Herodotus states that Egypt was ruled by 330 kings until Sesostris, yet several kings in his narrative—such as Sesostris himself—appear to be unhistorical. Elsewhere, he reports that Egyptian priests told him that the interval between Min (Menes) and Sethos (Shebitku) comprised "three hundred and forty-one generations of men," equated with the same number of kings and high priests, totaling 11,340 years by Herodotus' own calculations.[39]:142 These figures are highly problematic; the number of 341 kings appears to be a simple addition of the 330 kings mentioned earlier and the 11 rulers listed by Herodotus before Sethos. However, some of these rulers correspond to pharaohs of the Old Kingdom, which chronologically belong to some of Egypt's earliest dynasties.[40] Their placement after the period supposedly spanning hundreds of kings indicates a fundamental misunderstanding of the data provided by the priests, and the reference to a single papyrus containing the entire list further suggests that this figure was intended to represent the total number of pharaohs before the Persian conquest.
  9. ^ For Manetho's first two books, Julius Africanus records 192 kings in 2300 years and 96 kings in 2121 years, respectively. Book III lists 64 kings, totaling 361 kings in 5471 years. However, the actual sum of kings and years gives roughly 511 kings in 5368 years.[35] As noted before, the stated totals often disagree with the actual sum of items. Ultimately, none of the years given by Africanus nor Eusebius are useful, as Manetho originally recorded both years and months (see the comparison table below the Eighteenth Dynasty section).
  10. ^ There is some confusion on the exact identity of the king depicted in the Scorpion Macehead. Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, p. 91 refer to this king as "Scorpion I" and Bunson 2002, p. 356 adds that he "was followed by an obscure Scorpion II". According to Günter Dreyer, the Scorpion (I) buried in U-j is a different king from the Scorpion (II) of the macehead, with the former ruling before Iry-Hor.[49] This ruler is otherwise referred to simply as "Scorpion".[60]
  11. ^ a b c It is virtually impossible to establish the exact chronology of the early dynasties. According to Hornung, the First Dynasty lasted a minimum of 150 years, and only the reigns of Aha and Narmer remain unspecified.[61] None of Manetho's figures match the historical records and hence must be discarded. The chronology of the Second Dynasty is even more uncertain because Egypt was divided during most of its duration. The Turin King List does not acknowledge co-regencies for the Twelfth Dynasty,[62] and thus likely did not for the Second Dynasty either. This must have resulted in an inflated total of years, meaning that the "955 years"[63] given for the duration of the first eight dynasties must also be inflated.
  12. ^ a b Den's throne name Khasty was misread in later times as Qenqen, leading to Manetho's Kenkenes. The same signs for Khasty could be alternatively read as Semty (or Sepaty). This is likely the origin of Manetho's Ousaphaidos (after Hesepty). The name Ouenephes probably derives from Όννωφρις (Ónnofris), a synonym for the god Osiris, who was associated with Djer's tomb. Thus, the correct order of the first 5 pharaohs should be Menes → Athotis → Ouenephes → (Djet) → Kenkenes, the latter being the same as Ousaphaidos.[66] Whether the regnal years are also mixed is uncertain.
  13. ^ The name Meni, for instance, means "He who endures", likely referring to his position as the supposed founder of Egypt.[66] Others appear to be corruptions or misreadings. Djer's supposed throne name, Itti, does appear in the Palermo Stone, but it is rendered as a Golden Horus name.[67][68]
  14. ^ a b Throne names for the first three dynasties follow those found in the official king lists of the New Kingdom. However, none of them match contemporary records and are mostly corruptions or misreadings. Original throne names are given in small brackets.
  15. ^ a b c d e The figures for the early dynasties correspond to regnal years, which denote accession-based counting and do not necessarily correspond to full calendar years of rule.
  16. ^ The Greek historians Herodotus (c. 450 BC) and Diodorus Siculus (c. 50 BC) give two similar variants of the name: Min and Menas, respectively.[39]:99[41]:45
  17. ^ a b The names of Hotepsekhemwy and Nynetjer, albeit written with different characters, are both pronounced as Baunetjer in the Turin list.[88] They are both given a lifespan of 95 years, which implies a duplication mistake. The Giza list of the Old Kingdom recorded Hotep's name as "Bedjau", likely a corruption of his Horus name, while the Ramesside Abydos list corrupted Nynetjer's name into "Banetjer".[86] The Saqqara list further corrupted "Bedjau" into "Baunetjer", which lead to the Turin list recording both kings with similar sounding names (b3w-nṯr and b3-n-nṯr).[89]
  18. ^ As recorded in the Palermo Stone.[103] The Turin King List gives him a reign of 27 years, 2 months and 1 day, and a lifespan of 40 years (i.e. he would have started his reign at the age of 13 according to the Turin List). The "27 years" figure must be a corruption of "17 years", thus we must assume he stared his reign at 23 instead.[88]
  19. ^ Besides the Ramessid lists of Dynasty XIX, the name "Djoser" is also attested in a monument erected by Senusret II of Dynasty XII, as well as in the Westcar Papyrus of Dynasty XIII.[108]
  20. ^ According to Wilkinson, the Palermo Stone records 28 complete or partial years for Djoser,[107] which closely matches Manetho's figure of "29 years". The Turin King List gives "19 years"; Khasekhemwy's reign was similarly changed from "17 years" to "27 years". Ramesside scribes may have erroneously attributed the first 10 years of Djoser's reign to Khasekhemwy's.
  21. ^ As recorded in the Palermo Stone and Manetho (who calls him Tyreis, after his posthumous name Teti). The Turin King List records 6 years and x months and repeats the same figure for his successor, which may or may not be another copyist mistake.
  22. ^ Mesochris and Soyphis appear to be duplicated names from Dynasty IV (Mencheres and Souphis), while Tosertasis appears to be a duplicate of Tesorthros. The next names Aches, Sephouris and Kerpheres, are of unknown origin, but may as well be duplicates.
  23. ^ A minimum of 24 years can be deduced from his cattle counts, but other evidence points to a minimum reign of 27 years. The Turin King List precisely gives him 24 years, but this is considered too short.[115] According to one reconstruction of the Annals, he reigned for a minimum of 34 years.[120] Some argue that he reigned up to 50 years.[121]
  24. ^ Perhaps 26 years;[115] a recent finding suggests that he died shortly before completing 30 years.[123] Turin records 23 years, Herodotus 50, Africanus 63.
  25. ^ The Turin King List records 18 or 28 years, and contemporary evidence points to at least 11 years. However, Hornung argues that the Palermo Stone gives him a short reign of only 6 years, which also coincides with Herodotus' figure.[115]
  26. ^ Eusebius records 17 kings but mentions only Suphis (Khufu). Africanus gives the first three kings as Sneferu, Khufu, and Khafre, all of which were buried in the Giza pyramid complex. This suggests that Manetho's source was already corrupted or misread, as the three are given similar names (Soris/Souphis) and a reign length of about 60 years each (the number was likely the sum of several kings). The name "Suphis" (Σoυφις) is likely a corruption of "Kuphis" (Χoυφις).
  27. ^ Eusebius' fifth dynasty kings actually belong to the sixth, and Eusebius simply added 100 years for this dynasty in the total with the previous dynasties. This suggests that the epitomist misread, misunderstood, or accidentally skipped to the subsequent dynasty while copying the text.[35]
  28. ^ His reign is usually given as c. 12 years, but an "11th count" is recorded under an unknown king. According to Hornung, "all arguments favour the reign of Teti" and thus a biannual count would give at least 22 years. However, some counts were likely irregular.[149]
  29. ^ The name "Nitocris" possibly derives from the male king Netjerkare Siptah, later misunderstood as feminine. According to Flinders Petrie, Netjerkare was likely conflated with his successor Menkare, who was in turn merged with Menkaure, the well-known builder of the "Third Pyramid", due to the similarity of their names.[156]
  30. ^ a b The Turin King List gives a minimum of 155 years for the Sixth Dynasty, although Pepi II Neferkare's reign is possibly inflated by a few decades. The sum of years for the Sixth to Eighth Dynasties is given as 187 years, which implies c. 27 years for the latter period (the sum of known reigns amounts to a minimum of 15 years).
  31. ^ The Turin King List gives both Qakare Ibi and Neferkauhor a reign of 2 years, 1 month, and 1 day.
  32. ^ Bunson credits the Pyramid of Neferkare Neby to Neferkaure instead, and lists him as the founder of the Eight Dynasty, as well as the predecessor of Qakare.[158]
  33. ^ This is the numbering adopted by Bunson.[165] Leprohon, using an older reconstruction, records seven kings named "Khety". He refers to Wahkare as "Khety V", Nebkaure as "Khety VII", and Merybre as "Khety VIII".[166]
  34. ^ The Turin King List is considered more reliable from the Eleventh Dynasty onwards, as most of its figures match archeological records. The years given correspond to full years.
  35. ^ "Sixteen kings for 43 years" is clearly a corruption of "six kings for 143 years", as stated in the Turin King List. The king list also includes a lacuna of 7 years that corresponds to the reign of Mentuhotep IV, whose name was lost.[173] Africanus and Eusebius both record the same number of kings and years (Eusebius writes 79 days). The actual sum of Africanus' kings is 200, and that of his years is 2292. This is over twice the number of kings and years calculated by Egyptologists. Amenemhat I, the founder of the Twelfth Dynasty, was moved to this place for unknown reasons, most likely a misunderstanding of the original text.
  36. ^ 1878 was the date calculated by Parker in 1977,[16] but it has been shown that his "sequencing of the Illahun lunar dates was wrong".[17] Various dates have been proposed over the years, all around 1850 BC: Hornung argues for 1837/6,[17] while two independent studies argue for 1847[19] or 1886.[20]
  37. ^ a b The tale of Sesostris, who supposedly campaigned as far as Europe, was likely an Egyptian narrative to present an ideal ruler. According to Herodotus, Sesostris created a massive empire that stretched into Europe. Needless to say, pretty much all of Sesostris' deeds are believed to be unhistorical. He is thought to be a conflation of Egypt's greatest rulers (the Senusrets, Thutmose III and Ramesses II). Manetho identifies this "Sesostris" with Senusret III, the third king of his Twelfth Dynasty (omitting Amenemhat I and Senusret II).[187]
  38. ^ Bunson omits Merhotepre Sobekhotep in the count of Sobekhoteps, hence applying the name "Sobekhotep V" to Khahotepre Sobkehotep.[204]
  39. ^ The line is missing, but Ryholt theorizes that it contained a lacuna of five kings: Yakbim, Ya'ammu, Qareh, 'Ammu and Sheshi.[243]
  40. ^ Ryholt adds 13 rulers of uncertain position and chronology; some may be vassals under the 15th Dynasty and not actual kings, while others may be kings lost in the two lacunae of the Turin King List. They are mostly attested only by their scarab seals. By far the most attested king is Sheshi, who is attested in hundreds of seals.[248]
  41. ^ Thomas Schneider claims that the total is 108 years, but the editor notes that another reading could give 140 instead.[249] The number could be as high as 189.[250]
  42. ^ Another obscure ruler, Anat-her, is also attested with the title of Hyksos in his seals, but he lacks the complete royal titulary, mainly the nomen and prenomen. Beckerath places him in the 16th dynasty,[253] but Ryholt argues that the lack of cartouche names suggests that he was only a chiefman of foreign origin.[252]
  43. ^ The longest-reigning dynasty overall was the Ptolemaic, which ruled for 275 years. Another foreign dynasty, the Twenty-second, ruled c. 200 years. After the 18th dynasty, the longest-reigning native dynasties was the Twelfth, which ruled c. 180 years. Additionally, the exact duration of the First dynasty is uncertain but it might have lasted between 170 and 375 years, the latter option exceeding all known durations of any ancient Egyptian dynasty.[14]
  44. ^ She became pharaoh between Year 2 and 7 of Thutmose III;[300] her official regnal count retroactively included into her reign the time she had served as regent of Thutmose III, therefore his date of ascension to the throne–Year 1, I Shemu (9th month), day 4, which has been equated to 28 April 1479 BC, a date of "chronological certainty"–officially also became hers.[301] Hatshepsut's rule probably ended on Year 22, II Peret (6th month), day 10, which Hornung dates to 1458 BC.[286] However, the actual sum of days shows that her reign ended early in the following year. Her official reign was 21 years, 9 months, 11 days according to the Egyptian calendar, which does not match with the Gregorian calendar. Each of the 12 months was exactly 30 days, and there was an intercalary month of 5 days to complete the 365-cycle.
  45. ^ Thutmose III's reign is known to the day thanks to official records and astronomical calculations. His reign began in Year 1, I Shemu (9th month), day 4, and ended in Year 54, III Peret (7th month), day 30.[301][286] Beckerath claims that it is a "chronological certainty" that his accession was on 28 April 1479, and then calculates that his death occurred on 11 March 1425.[303] However, the actual length between the two dates is 53 years and 331 days (10 months + 26 days + 5 intercalary days), giving 25 March if reckoning from 28 April 1479. The sole reign of Thutmose III began on Year 22, II Peret, day 10,[286] and thus lasted 32 years and 50 days.
  46. ^ It is unclear if Amenhotep began his rule as co-ruler for a couple of years. If he was named co-ruler, his reign likely began the day after his father's death, i.e. Year 1 IV Peret (8th month), day 1. If not, it may have begun in Year 3, III Shemu (9th month), day 15.[286]
  47. ^ The reign of Akhenaten began on the first 8 days of Peret (5th month) and likely ended on Year 17, II Akhet (2nd month), a date "corresponding to August 22 to September 20 [Julian] in 1336 BC".[308]
  48. ^ This is the sum of Josephus' figures; the subdivision is only found in Africanus and Eusebius. Josephus' total, excluding Queen Hatshepsut, is 71 years, 8 months. The original text likely counted the years between Ahmose I and the beginning of Thutmose III's sole reign, acknowledging that Hatshepsut ruled as senior co-ruler. However, Manetho's scribes misunderstood the text. Africanus' subtotal is notably off by several years, while Eusebius completely omits Hatshepsut.
  49. ^ a b c The name "Chebren" is a corruption of Kheperen, derived from the throne name of Thutmose I and II. The name "Mephres" is a corruption of Menkheperre, the throne name of Thutmose III.[319] Most scholars believe that "Chebron" refers to Thutmose II.[286] Mephramouthosis is thus probably a corruption of Menkheperre Thutmosis (Thutmose III). His reign probably corresponds to Josephus' "30 years", itself derived from his sole reign.[286]
  50. ^ It is often stated that his coronation took place on III Shemu 24,[323] although it may refer to his death.[324]
  51. ^ Ramesses II began his reign on Year 1, III Shemu (11th month), day 27, which Beckerath equals to 31 May 1279 BC,[326] and died on Year 67, II Akhet (2nd month), day 6.[324] This equates to a total of 66 years, 2 months, 14 days according to the Egyptian calendar, or 66 years and 74 days.
  52. ^ Merneptah's accession took place between 19/I Akhet and 13/II Akhet,[328] which perfectly aligns with Ramesses II's death on 6/II Akhet. His highest date is likely 7/IV/ Akhet year 10. Beckerath calculates his death as 3 May 1203, but notes that the chronology of his succession is disputed.[326] Because this, his exact date of death remains uncertain.[328]
  53. ^ The accession of Seti II probably took place on, or shortly after, the 29th day of II Peret (6th month). His death was announced in Thebes in Year 6, I Peret (5th month), day 19. His successor began his reign on I Peret, day 1–3, which places Seti's death at the end of IV Akhet (4th month).[328] The exact chronology of events surrounding Amenmesse's usurpation is not clear. Beckerath proposes that the reign of Seti II actually began after Amenmesse's, c. December 1200/1199.[326]
  54. ^ Amenmesse's accession took place around II Shemu (10th month), more precisely between 27/I/Shemu and 18/III/ Shemu. His last known date is Year 4, 29/III/ Shemu.[328] Beckerath proposes that the reign of Amenmesse began on 3 May 1203, immediately after that of Merneptah.[326]
  55. ^ Siptah began his reign on I Peret (5th month), day 1–3, and died on Year 7, II Akhet, day 10–12. Some authors argue that he died on Year 6.[328]
  56. ^ Tausret probably died on I Shemu (9th month), Year 8. While her reign de jure lasted 2–4 years, she retroactively reckoned it as a continuation of Siptah's, who reigned from the start of I Peret (5th month).[328][337]
  57. ^ The main difficulty in determining the exact duration of the dynasty is the lack of data for the first two pharaohs. The simple sum of total years gives 99 years, but the addition of months raises this figure to roughly 102 years, while the subtraction of dates (1292–1191) gives 101 years. Manetho's original number was probably "104 years", which was corrupted into "204" by Africanus, and "194" by Eusebius.
  58. ^ Setnakhte probably began his reign on II Shemu and died on Year 3, I Shemu, day 25, shortly before completing his 3rd regnal year.[328]
  59. ^ Ramesses III began his reign on I Shemu, day 26, and likely died in Year 32, III Shemu, day 14.[328]
  60. ^ Ramesses IV began his reign on III Shemu (11th month), day 15, and died in Year 7, around IV Peret (8th month). There is uncertainty about the exact chronology; his death may have occurred as early as I Peret (5th month).[328]
  61. ^ Ramesses V began his reign between I Peret (5th month) and IV Peret (8th month), and ended in Year 3, II Peret (6th month). Krauss assigns him a reign of 3 years 10 months, accepting an accession date in IV Peret.[328]
  62. ^ Ramesses VI began his reign around II Peret, day 8, and died sometime after Year 8, II Peret, day 11. Additional evidence points to a reign of 7 years and 9 months.[328]
  63. ^ a b The accession date of Ramesses VII is highly disputed. Beckerath dates it to the end of III Peret (7th month). His highest known date may have been Year 8, IV Shemu, day 25, but it has been argued that it belongs to Ramesses IX instead. The accession date of Ramesses VIII is also disputed, having been dated between I Peret (5th month) and I Akhet (1st month), or potentially earlier. He died on I Akhet, day 20, potentially having reigned for a full year.[328]
  64. ^ The reign of Ramesses IX probably began on I Akhet (1st month), day 21, and ended in Year 19, I Peret (5th month), day 26.[328]
  65. ^ The reign of Ramesses X probably began on I Peret (5th month), day 26, and ended sometime after Year 3, IV Akhet (4 month). However, he may have ruled until Year 4.[328] A figure of 3 years and 10 months have been proposed by Demarée.[341]
  66. ^ The reign of Ramesses XI probably began on III or IV Shemu (11th or 12th month), and ended sometime after his 28th year; the exact date is uncertain.[328]
  67. ^ In the table of rulers at the end of his book, Hornung follows Beckerath in listing 9 kings for Dynasty 22. However, the individual chapter discussing the same dynasty gives a different succession.[374][375] There, Karl Jansen-Winkeln explains that three kings named "Shoshenq" should be placed between Osorkon and Takelot I. However, the dates in the table of rulers follow Rolf Krauss, who placed a single "Shoshenq II" after Takelot and gave him a single regnal year.[290] Frédéric Payraudeau places two kings named "Shoshenq" after Takelot and gives them about 8 years of combined rule. As a result, the reign of Osorkon II is given as 865–830 by Payraudeau, and 872–842 by Krauss. [359] The chronology of the first two kings is more certain, the combined reign of Shoshenq I and Osorkon I is given as 943–987 and 943–988, respectively.[359][374]
  68. ^ Payraudeau gives the reign of Bakenranef as 716–712 BC.[359] However, this does not match the contemporary evidence. One stela records Year 8 of Tefnakht (some authors have argued that the king should be identified as Tefnakht II, but this seems unlikely), and another records Year 6 of Bakenranef, which matches Manetho's figure.[415] Payraudeau follows Anthony Spalinger in dating the end of the Kushite conquest to 712 BC. However, he seemingly dismisses Bakenranef’s stela and assigns him only 4 years. Spalinger gives his reign as 718–712 BC, which implies that Tefnakht began his reign in 726 BC.[416]
  69. ^ The reign of Necho II began sometime between 23 January and 19 November 610 BC and ended sometime between 4 May 595 BC and 19 January 594 BC. His successor Psamtik I died on Month 1 Day 23 of his Year 7, which equals 9 February 589 BC.[432]
  70. ^ a b c The earliest document of Ahmose II is dated to July 570 BC.[432] Cambyses was declared pharaoh on or shortly before August 525 BC (outdated sources dated his first document to 29 May 525 BC)[438][439] and died shortly after 1 July 522 BC.[440][441]
  71. ^ i.e. Egyptian personal name / nomen.
  72. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m The nomen is not attested in hieroglyphs.[452]
  73. ^ Babylonian documents confirm the brief rule of Bardiya,[441] but he does not appear in any Egyptian records. However, it's still possible that news of Bardiya's accession reached Egypt at some point. For instance, the reign of emperors Gordian I and Gordian II lasted only 20 days. Still, news of their accession managed to travel from Rome to Alexandria in time to be included in official documents for roughly one month (such travel took around 25 days by ship).[448]
  74. ^ The date of the end of the Thirtieth Dynasty is universally given as 343/342 BC (late 343 to early 342).[465] Leo Depuydt proposed 340/339 BC as a new date for the second Persian conquest.[466] The summation of Manetho's reigns for the 28th to 30th Dynasties, assuming they are all correct, amounts to 64 years,[409] which closely matches the 65 years between 404 BC and 339 BC. However, Depuydt's rearrangement has not been widely adopted. Damien Agut-Labordère has labeled it as "not convincing",[467] while Payraudeau has also favoured 342 BC.[468]
  75. ^ The Siege of Gaza, at Egypt's eastern frontier, took place in October 332 BC, after which Alexander spent several months in Egypt.[476] His coronation therefore cannot have occurred earlier than November. Notably, this timing would have aligned his accession with the Egyptian New Year, which fell on 14 November in 332 BC.[477] His death certainly took place on 11 June 323 BC.[478][479]
  76. ^ Some scholars have argued that he was killed around 310 BC, but continued to be posthumously recognized as king. He was probably killed in 305/304, around the same time that Ptolemy claimed the title of king.[481]
  77. ^ The exact chronology of Ptolemy's coronation is problematic, but it most likely took place between November 305 and July 304, possibly c. June. Regnal years during the Late dynastic period were all antedated so that a king's accession always coincided with the New Year; as such, Ptolemy's reign officially began on 7 November 305 BC. His death has been dated to January 282, although April/June is also possible. Various Greek authors write that he abdicated c. 285 BC, but this is uncertain and often disregarded by modern scholars.[484]
  78. ^ The sum of Cleopatra II's reigns amounts to 58 years, the longest reign alongside Pepi II Neferkare (64) and Ramesses II (66), as well as one of the longest-reigning monarchs in history.
  79. ^ Also called Cleopatra Philometor Soteira when associated with her son Ptolemy IX Soter.[497]
  80. ^ Most authors date Claeopatra's accession to 51 BC. Some authors have proposed a brief co-regency with her father in 52 BC, but the evidence isn't conclusive. Her reign was technically interrupted by a few months during 48 BC.[506] Cleopatra almost certainly died on the 17th day of the Egyptian month Mesori, which corresponds to 10 August in the older Roman calendar, and 12 August in the Julian calendar.[507]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ Clayton 2001, p. 205. "When Egypt fell to the Persians in 343 BC, the reign of Nectanebo II, the last Egyptian pharaoh, came to an end; he was also the last Egyptian to rule Egypt for 2300 years until General Neguib and the 1952 Revolution".
  2. ^ Tyldesley, Joyce (2009). Cleopatra: Last Queen of Egypt. Profile Books. pp. 3 of paperback edition, 20–21 of e-book edition. ISBN 978-1-86197-901-8. The Ptolemies believed themselves to be a valid Egyptian dynasty, and devoted a great deal of time and money to demonstrating that they were the theological continuation of all the dynasties that had gone before. Cleopatra defined herself as an Egyptian queen and drew on the iconography and cultural references of earlier queens to reinforce her position. Her people and her contemporaries accepted her as such.
  3. ^ Beckerath 1999, pp. 266–267.
  4. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m University College London 2000.
  5. ^ Beckerath 1999.
  6. ^ Lundström 2025b.
  7. ^ a b c d e f g h i Beckerath 1999, p. 283.
  8. ^ a b c d e f g Bunson 2002, p. 105.
  9. ^ a b c d e f g h Shaw 2003, p. 481.
  10. ^ a b c d e Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, p. 490.
  11. ^ Tetley 2017, pp. 323ff.
  12. ^ a b c Hayes 2007, pp. 173–176.
  13. ^ Gardiner, Alan Henderson (1961). Egypt of the Pharaohs: An Introduction. Clarendon Press. pp. 61–68.
  14. ^ a b c d e Dee, M.; Wengrow, D.; Shortland, A.; Stevenson, A.; Brock, F.; Girdland Flink, L.; Bronk Ramsey, C. (2013). "An absolute chronology for early Egypt using radiocarbon dating and Bayesian statistical modelling". Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 469 (2159). Bibcode:2013RSPSA.46930395D. doi:10.1098/rspa.2013.0395. PMC 3780825. PMID 24204188.
  15. ^ a b c Quiles, Anita; Tristant, Yann (2023). "Radiocarbon-Based Modeling of the Reign of King den (1St Dynasty, Egypt) and the Start of the Old Kingdom". Radiocarbon. 65 (2): 485–504. Bibcode:2023Radcb..65..485Q. doi:10.1017/RDC.2023.15. ISSN 0033-8222.
  16. ^ a b Parker, Richard A. (1977). "The Sothic Dating of the Twelfth and Eighteenth Dynasties" (PDF). Studies in Honor of George R. Hughes.
  17. ^ a b c Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, p. 439-457.
  18. ^ Shaw, Ian (2021). Ancient Egypt: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. pp. 40–61. ISBN 978-0-19-884546-1.
  19. ^ a b Banjevic, B. (2001). "Lunar Dates and Chronology of the Late Middle Kingdom of Ancient Egypt". Journal of Serbian Archaeological Society, 17, 105–115.
  20. ^ a b Ossowski Larsson, P., & Larsson, L.-A. (2022). The absolute dating of three pharaohs of the Egyptian 12th dynasty.
  21. ^ Tetley 2017, pp. 171–178.
  22. ^ Keenan, Douglas J. (2012). Dating of the Egyptian Middle Kingdom is Fallacious. London.
  23. ^ a b Erdil, P.; Webster, L.; Kuitems, M.; Knoblauch, C.; Bestock, L.; Höflmayer, F.; Beeckman, H.; Fuller, D. Q.; Manning, S. W.; Dee, M. W. (2025). "Resolution of the High versus Low debate for Old and Middle Kingdom Egypt". PLOS ONE. 20 (5) e0314612. Bibcode:2025PLoSO..2014612E. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0314612. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 12119019. PMID 40435227.
  24. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p Ramsey, Christopher B.; Dee, Michael W.; Rowland, Joanne M.; Higham, Thomas F. G.; Harris, Stephen A.; Brock, Fiona; Quiles, Anita; Wild, Eva M.; Marcus, Ezra S.; Shortland, Andrew J. (2010). "Radiocarbon-Based Chronology for Dynastic Egypt". Science. New Series. 328 (5985). American Association for the Advancement of Science: 1554–1557. Bibcode:2010Sci...328.1554R. doi:10.1126/science.1189395. JSTOR 40656429. PMID 20558717. S2CID 206526496.
  25. ^ a b Quiles, Anita; Aubourg, E.; Berthier, B.; Delque-Količ, Emmanuelle; Pierrat-Bonnefois, G.; Dee, M. W.; Audreu-Lanoë, G.; Ramsey, C. Bronk; Moreau, C. (2012). "Bayesian modelling of an absolute chronology for Egypt's 18th Dynasty by astrophysical and radiocarbon methods". Journal of Archaeological Science. 40: 423–432. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2012.05.026.
  26. ^ Larsson, Petra Ossowski; Lars-Åke Larsson (2020). Towards an absolute scientific date for the Egyptian New Kingdom, part 2: the New Moon dates. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.12339.66088.
  27. ^ Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, pp. 44–45.
  28. ^ Lundström 2025c.
  29. ^ a b Lundström, Peter. "Turin king list: Contents". Pharaohs of Ancient Egypt.
  30. ^ Moyer, Ian S. (2011). Egypt and the Limits of Hellenism. Cambridge University Press. p. 64. ISBN 978-1-139-49655-1.
  31. ^ Ryholt, Kim (2005). "The Turin King-List". Ägypten und Levante (in German). 1 (XIV): 135–156. doi:10.1553/AEundL14s135. ISSN 1015-5104.
  32. ^ Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, pp. 33–36.
  33. ^ Lange, Armin; Mayerhofer, Kerstin; Porat, Dina; Schiffman, Lawrence H. (2021). Comprehending Antisemitism through the Ages: A Historical Perspective. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. pp. 88–90. ISBN 978-3-11-067199-5.
  34. ^ a b Verbrugghe, Gerald; Wickersham, John Moore (2001). Berossos and Manetho, Introduced and Translated. University of Michigan Press. pp. 95–115. ISBN 978-0-472-08687-0.
  35. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q Lundström 2025.
  36. ^ "Manetho". LacusCurtius.
  37. ^ Greenberg, Gary; Gosline, Sheldon Lee (2003). "1. The Problem of Manetho's Chronology". Manetho: A Study in Egyptian Chronology. How Ancient Scribes Garbled an Accurate Chronology of Dynastic Egypt. Shangri-La Publications. ISBN 978-0-9714683-6-8.
  38. ^ Schlichter, Felix (2024). "The Dynasties of Manetho". Mythology, Chronology, Idolatry. BRILL. pp. 226–270. ISBN 978-90-04-68496-6.
  39. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Herodotus, Histories, Book II.
  40. ^ a b Lundström, Peter. The king lists of Herodotus. Pharaohs of Ancient Egypt
  41. ^ a b c d e Diodorus Siculus, Bibliotheca Historica Book I.
  42. ^ Ryholt 1997, pp. 72–74, 98–99.
  43. ^ Hratch Papazian (2015). "The State of Egypt in the Eighth Dynasty". In Peter Der Manuelian; Thomas Schneider (eds.). Towards a New History for the Egyptian Old Kingdom: Perspectives on the Pyramid Age. Harvard Egyptological Studies. BRILL.
  44. ^ a b Mladjov 2021a.
  45. ^ Strudwick, Nigel (2005). Texts from the Pyramid Age. Society of Biblical Lit. pp. 14–15. ISBN 978-1-58983-138-4.
  46. ^ a b c d e Raffaele, Francesco (2002). "Dynasty 00". Late predynastic and early dynastic Egypt.
  47. ^ a b c d e f Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, pp. 95–96.
  48. ^ a b c d e f Wilkinson 2005, pp. 45–47.
  49. ^ a b c d Jiménez Serrano, Alejandro (2000). "Los reyes del Predinástico Tardío (Naqada III)" (PDF). Boletín de la Asociación Española de Egiptología (10): 33. ISSN 1131-6780.
  50. ^ a b Heagy, Thomas C. (2014). "Who Was Menes?" (PDF). Archéo nil. 24: 59–92. doi:10.3406/arnil.2014.1071. S2CID 248280047.
  51. ^ Wilkinson 2005, p. 41.
  52. ^ Ikram, Salima and Rossi, Corinna (2004). "An Early Dynastic serekh from the Kharga Oasis". The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology. 90: 211–215. doi:10.1177/030751330409000112. ISSN 0307-5133. JSTOR 3822252. S2CID 190218264.
  53. ^ Barry Kemp, Andrew Boyce and James Harrell, (2000) The Colossi from the Early Shrine at Coptos in Egypt, in: Cambridge Archaeological Journal Volume 10, Issue 2, p. 233
  54. ^ a b Altenmüller, Hartwig; Kloth, Nicole (January 1, 2008). Studien zur Altägyptischen Kultur Band 37. Helmut Buske Verlag. ISBN 978-3-87548-937-8 – via Google Books.
  55. ^ Ludwig David Morenz (2004). « Bild-Buchstaben und symbolische Zeichen. Die Herausbildung der Schrift der hohen Kultur Altägyptens», Orbis Biblicus et Orientalis, Fribourg, vol. 205, p. 91. ISBN 3-7278-1486-1
  56. ^ a b Beckerath 1999, pp. 36–37.
  57. ^ Wilkinson 2005, pp. 19, 55, 234.
  58. ^ a b P. Tallet, D. Laisnay (2012): Iry-Hor et Narmer au Sud-Sinaï (Ouadi 'Ameyra), un complément à la chronologie des expéditios minière égyptiene, in: BIFAO 112, pp. 381–395
  59. ^ Wilkinson 2005, pp. 42–7; Bunson 2002, p. 356; Clayton 2001, p. 17.
  60. ^ Wilkinson 2005, pp. 42–7; Bunson 2002, p. 356; Clayton 2001, p. 17; Beckerath 1999, p. 37.
  61. ^ a b c Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, pp. 21–25, 94–101, 490.
  62. ^ a b c d e f g Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, pp. 170–175.
  63. ^ a b c d e f Turin King List: column 5
  64. ^ Wilkinson 2005, pp. 55–56.
  65. ^ Wilkinson 2005, pp. 48, 56–57.
  66. ^ a b c d Edwards, I.E.S. (2006) [1971]. "The Early Dynastic Period in Egypt". The Cambridge Ancient History. Vol. 1 (Part 2). CUP. pp. 1–35. ISBN 978-0-521-07791-0.
  67. ^ a b Wilkinson 2000, pp. 186–187.
  68. ^ Cervelló, Autuori Josep (2005). "Was King Narmer Menes?". Archéo-Nil. 15 (1): 31–46. doi:10.3406/arnil.2005.896.
  69. ^ Wilkinson 2005, pp. 56–8; Bunson 2002, p. 262; Clayton 2001, pp. 17–21; Tetley 2017, pp. 267–8.
  70. ^ Beckerath 1999, pp. 38–39.
  71. ^ Wilkinson 2005, p. 71; Bunson 2002, pp. 102–3; Clayton 2001, p. 22; Tetley 2017, p. 272.
  72. ^ Wilkinson 2005, pp. 61–2; Bunson 2002, p. 101; Clayton 2001, p. 22; Tetley 2017, pp. 272–3.
  73. ^ Wilkinson 2005, pp. 63–5; Bunson 2002, p. 99; Clayton 2001, pp. 23–4; Tetley 2017, p. 273.
  74. ^ Wilkinson 2005, pp. 75–7; Bunson 2002, p. 9; Clayton 2001, pp. 24–5; Tetley 2017, pp. 273–4.
  75. ^ Wilkinson 2005, pp. 66–7; Bunson 2002, p. 360; Clayton 2001, p. 25; Tetley 2017, pp. 275–6.
  76. ^ Wilkinson 2005, p. 68; Bunson 2002, p. 324; Clayton 2001, p. 25; Tetley 2017, p. 277.
  77. ^ Wilkinson 2005, p. 229.
  78. ^ Wilkinson 2005, p. 69.
  79. ^ Abydos Canon
  80. ^ Turin King List: column 3
  81. ^ a b c Wilkinson 2000, pp. 71–81, 258–259.
  82. ^ Edwards, I.E.S. (2006) [1971]. The Cambridge Ancient History. Vol. 1 (Part 2). CUP. p. 994.
  83. ^ a b Helck 1987, p. 125.
  84. ^ Zulian, Marcelo (2017). "Manetón y la Dinastía II. Pistas sobre las dinámicas de poder a comienzos de la historia egipcia". XVI Jornadas Interescuelas/Departamentos de Historia. Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata.
  85. ^ a b c d e f g h i Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, pp. 102–115, 490.
  86. ^ a b Wilson, R. Avry (2017). Introducing Shenkhet: A Relationship of Old Kingdom Nomenclatures and the Ancient Egyptian Environment.
  87. ^ Wilkinson 2005, p. 70; Bunson 2002, p. 173; Clayton 2001, p. 26; Tetley 2017, p. 277.
  88. ^ a b c d e f g h i Turin King List: column 3–4.
  89. ^ Beckerath 1999, p. 42.
  90. ^ a b c Wildung, Dietrich (1969). Die Rolle ägyptischer Könige im Bewusstsein ihrer Nachwelt. Band 1. Münchner ägyptologische Studien vol. 17. ZDB-ID 500317-9. Berlin, pp. 31–47.
  91. ^ Wilkinson 2005, pp. 70–1; Bunson 2002, p. 344; Clayton 2001, pp. 26–27; Tetley 2017, p. 278.
  92. ^ Wilkinson 2005, pp. 71–2; Bunson 2002, p. 279; Clayton 2001, p. 27.
  93. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 430; Tetley 2017, pp. 279–280.
  94. ^ a b Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, p. 21.
  95. ^ Wilkinson 2005, pp. 74–5; Bunson 2002, p. 361.
  96. ^ Von der Way, Thomas (1997), "Zur Datierung des "Labyrinth-Gebäudes" auf dem Tell el-Fara'in (Buto)", Göttinger Miszellen, 157: 107–111
  97. ^ Kenneth Anderson Kitchen: Ramesside Inscriptions. page 234–235. [full citation needed]
  98. ^ Raffaele, Francesco (2010). "Horus BA (Third Dynasty)". Late Predynastic and Early Dynastic Egypt.
  99. ^ Swelim, Nabil (1983). Some Problems on the History of the Third Dynasty. Archaeological Society of Alexandria. pp. 27–32, 180 & 219.
  100. ^ a b c Wilkinson 2005, pp. 75–77.
  101. ^ Wilkinson 2005, pp. 74–76.
  102. ^ Wilkinson 2005, pp. 77–9; Bunson 2002, pp. 199–200; Clayton 2001, pp. 28–9; Tetley 2017, p. 277.
  103. ^ Wilkinson 2000, pp. 78–79, 258.
  104. ^ Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, pp. 102–108, 490.
  105. ^ Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, pp. 116–123.
  106. ^ Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, pp. 116–123, 490.
  107. ^ a b Wilkinson 2000, pp. 79, 258.
  108. ^ Beckerath 1999, p. 48 (n3).
  109. ^ Wilkinson 2005, pp. 80–2; Bunson 2002, p. 103; Clayton 2001, pp. 37–42.
  110. ^ Wilkinson 2005, pp. 82–4; Bunson 2002, p. 359; Clayton 2001, pp. 38–9.
  111. ^ Wilkinson 2005, pp. 84–7; Bunson 2002, p. 264; Clayton 2001, p. 32.
  112. ^ Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, p. 123. "Beckerath's recent calculation allows only 24 years for all three remaining kings, in clear contradiction of TC which gives 24 years to Huni alone plus six more for Hu-djefa".
  113. ^ Wilkinson 2005, pp. 84–7; Bunson 2002, p. 197; Clayton 2001, p. 40.
  114. ^ Wilkinson 2005, pp. 84–7; Bunson 2002, p. 174; Clayton 2001, pp. 40–1.
  115. ^ a b c d Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, pp. 124–143, 484–486, 491.
  116. ^ Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, pp. 490–491.
  117. ^ a b Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, pp. 124–143, 490–491.
  118. ^ a b c Wilkinson 2000, p. 79.
  119. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 378; Clayton 2001, p. 42–5.
  120. ^ Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, p. 25.
  121. ^ Tetley 2017, pp. 292–300.
  122. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 203-4; Clayton 2001, p. 45–50.
  123. ^ "Khufu's 30-Year Jubilee: Newly Discovered Pieces of a Puzzle".
  124. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 333; Clayton 2001, pp. 50–51.
  125. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 198; Clayton 2001, pp. 50–1.
  126. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 236–7; Clayton 2001, pp. 51–8.
  127. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 372; Clayton 2001, pp. 58–9.
  128. ^ a b Bunson 2002, p. 200.
  129. ^ Donald B. Redford (1986): Pharaonic king-lists, annals, and day-books: a contribution to the study of the Egyptian sense of history (= SSEA publication, Society for the Study of Egyptian Antiquities. Band 4). Benben, Indiana, ISBN 0920168078, p. 237.
  130. ^ a b Lundström, Peter. "Minor Egyptian king lists". Pharaohs of Ancient Egypt.
  131. ^ a b c Turin King List: column 4.
  132. ^ Petrie 1897, p. 70.
  133. ^ a b c d Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, p. 491.
  134. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 421; Clayton 2001, pp. 60–1.
  135. ^ a b Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, pp. 123–143, 482–486, 491.
  136. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 350–351; Clayton 2001, p. 62.
  137. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 191; Clayton 2001, p. 62.
  138. ^ Beckerath 1999, pp. 56–57; Bunson 2002, pp. 372; Tetley 2017, pp. 320–322.
  139. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 266.
  140. ^ Beckerath 1999, p. 58.
  141. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 279.
  142. ^ Hawass, Zahi (2010). "The excavation of the headless pyramid, Lepsius XXIX". Perspectives on ancient Egypt: studies in honor of Edward Brovarski. Cairo: Supreme Council of Antiquities. pp. 153–170. ISBN 978-977-704-087-7.
  143. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 186.
  144. ^ Quiles, Anita; Vymazalová, Hana; Bárta, Miroslav; Megahed, Mohamed (2025). "Dating the Egyptian Old Kingdom: The reign of Djedkare (5th dynasty)". Radiocarbon. 67 (1): 155–175. Bibcode:2025Radcb..67..155Q. doi:10.1017/RDC.2024.100. ISSN 0033-8222.
  145. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 420; Clayton 2001, p. 63.
  146. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Bunson 2002, p. 106.
  147. ^ Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, pp. 144–158, 491.
  148. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 402; Clayton 2001, pp. 64–5.
  149. ^ Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, pp. 144–158, 482–483, 491.
  150. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 421; Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, p. 146.
  151. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 299; Clayton 2001, pp. 65–6.
  152. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 115.
  153. ^ a b Bunson 2002, pp. 238–9; Clayton 2001, p. 66.
  154. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 299–300; Clayton 2001, pp. 66–7; Tetley 2017, pp. 241–3.
  155. ^ a b c d e Aegyptiaca Book I
  156. ^ a b c Ryholt, Kim (2000). "The Late Old Kingdom in the Turin King-list and the Identity of Nitocris" (PDF). Zeitschrift für Ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde. 127 (1): 87–119. doi:10.1524/zaes.2000.127.1.87. ISSN 2196-713X.
  157. ^ a b Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, pp. 482.
  158. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 268.
  159. ^ Mostafa, Maha Farid (2014): The Mastaba of SmAj at Naga' Kom el-Koffar, Qift, Vol. I, Cairo, ISBN 978-977642004-5, p. 157-161
  160. ^ a b Bunson 2002, p. 185.
  161. ^ Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, pp. 63–67.
  162. ^ Beckerath 1999, p. 72.
  163. ^ a b c d Málek, Jaromír (1982). "The Original Version of the Royal Canon of Turin". The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology. 68: 93–106. doi:10.2307/3821628. ISSN 0307-5133. JSTOR 3821628.
  164. ^ Lundström 2025
  165. ^ a b c d Bunson 2002, pp. 201–202.
  166. ^ Leprohon 2013, pp. 50–52.
  167. ^ a b Hayes, William (2006) [1971]. "The Heracleopolitan Kingdom". In Edwards, I.E.S.; Gadd, C.J. (eds.). The Cambridge Ancient History. Vol. 1 (Part 2). CUP. pp. 464–468.
  168. ^ Beckerath 1999, p. 74.
  169. ^ Turin King List: column 5–6
  170. ^ a b Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, pp. 159–163.
  171. ^ Beckerath 1999, p. 76.
  172. ^ a b c d e f Bunson 2002, p. 181.
  173. ^ a b Turin King List: column 6
  174. ^ a b Beckerath 1999, p. 284.
  175. ^ Clayton 2001, p. 90ff.
  176. ^ a b c d Shaw 2003, p. 483.
  177. ^ a b c Bunson 2002, pp. 250–1; Clayton 2001, pp. 72–7.
  178. ^ Beckerath 1999, pp. 80–81.
  179. ^ a b c d e Shaw 2003, p. 484.
  180. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 25–6; Clayton 2001, pp. 78–9.
  181. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 362–3; Clayton 2001, pp. 79–82.
  182. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 362–3; Clayton 2001, p. 83.
  183. ^ Lloyd 2010, pp. 92–93.
  184. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 363; Clayton 2001, pp. 82–3.
  185. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 363–4; Clayton 2001, pp. 84–7.
  186. ^ Török, László (2014). Herodotus in Nubia. BRILL. p. 65. ISBN 978-90-04-27388-7.
  187. ^ a b c d Aegyptiaca Book II
  188. ^ a b Bunson 2002, p. 27; Clayton 2001, pp. 87–9.
  189. ^ Cooney 2018, p. 90.
  190. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 380; Clayton 2001, p. 89.
  191. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 383.
  192. ^ a b Bunson 2002, p. 351.
  193. ^ a b c Bunson 2002, p. 27.
  194. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 158.
  195. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, pp. 175–181, 195–196.
  196. ^ Ryholt 1997, pp. 72–74.
  197. ^ Ryholt 1997, pp. 73–74, 197–198.
  198. ^ Ryholt 1997, p. 75.
  199. ^ Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, p. 75.
  200. ^ Beckerath 1999, p. 484.
  201. ^ a b Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, p. 492.
  202. ^ a b Ryholt 1997, p. 408.
  203. ^ a b c Turin King List: column 7–8
  204. ^ a b c d e f Bunson 2002, p. 379.
  205. ^ a b Ryholt 1997, p. 209.
  206. ^ a b Ryholt 1997, p. 195.
  207. ^ a b c d Ryholt 1997, p. 214.
  208. ^ Ryholt 1997, p. 338.
  209. ^ a b c Ryholt 1997, p. 216.
  210. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 170.
  211. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 430.
  212. ^ Ryholt 1997, pp. 220–221.
  213. ^ Clayton 2001, p. 91.
  214. ^ Ryholt 1997, pp. 222–224.
  215. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 267–8.
  216. ^ a b Ryholt 1997, pp. 225–231.
  217. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 350.
  218. ^ Ryholt 1997, pp. 231–232.
  219. ^ Ryholt 1997, pp. 353–354.
  220. ^ a b Bunson 2002, p. 61.
  221. ^ Ryholt 1997, pp. 233–235.
  222. ^ a b Baker 2008, p. 137.
  223. ^ Baker 2008, p. 139.
  224. ^ Baker 2008, pp. 381–382.
  225. ^ Baker 2008, pp. 231–232.
  226. ^ Beckerath 1999, p. 104.
  227. ^ Baker 2008, p. 149.
  228. ^ Barsanti, A. (1908). Stèle inédite au nom du roi Radadaouhotep Doudoumes, in: ASAE 9 (1908), pl. 1-2
  229. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 95.
  230. ^ Baker 2008, p. 221.
  231. ^ a b c d Ryholt 1997, pp. 158, 408–410.
  232. ^ Baker 2008, p. 232.
  233. ^ Ryholt 1997, pp. 168, 170, 171, 179, 204, 400.
  234. ^ Baker 2008, pp. 291–292.
  235. ^ Ryholt 1997, pp. 324, 335. "A date in the FIP would appear more likely, although this would be somewhat early for a scarab-shaped seal".
  236. ^ Lundström, Peter. "Maara Sobekhotep in hieroglyphs". Pharaohs of Ancient Egypt.
  237. ^ Beckerath 1999, pp. 102–107.
  238. ^ Ryholt 1997, pp. 73–74, 408.
  239. ^ a b Beckerath 1999, pp. 88–101.
  240. ^ Ryholt 1997, pp. 5ff, 103–015.
  241. ^ Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, p. 169.
  242. ^ Turin King List: columns 9–10.
  243. ^ a b Ryholt 1997, p. 98.
  244. ^ Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, pp. 168–180.
  245. ^ Baker 2008, p. 374.
  246. ^ Beckerath 1999, pp. 108–110.
  247. ^ Beckerath 1999, p. 485.
  248. ^ Ben-Tor, Daphna (2010). "Sequence and chronology of Second Intermediate Period royal-name scarabs, based on excavated series from Egypt and the Levant". In Marée, Marcel (ed.). The Second Intermediate Period (Thirteenth-Seventeenth Dynasties). Current Research, Future Prospects. Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 192. Leuven; Walpole, MA: Peeters. ISBN 978-90-429-2228-0.
  249. ^ a b Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, pp. 192–195.
  250. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Turin King List: column 10–11.
  251. ^ Lloyd 2010, pp. 103–104.
  252. ^ a b Ryholt 1997, pp. 119–125.
  253. ^ Beckerath 1999, p. 116.
  254. ^ Beckerath 1999, p. 285.
  255. ^ a b c Ryholt 1997, p. 410.
  256. ^ Beckerath 1999, p. 114.
  257. ^ Clayton 2001, pp. 93–94.
  258. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 372.
  259. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 435.
  260. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 202.
  261. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 44.
  262. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 199.
  263. ^ a b Beckerath 1999, pp. 116–122.
  264. ^ Bennett, Chris (2002). "A Genealogical Chronology of the Seventeenth Dynasty". Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt. 39: 123–155. doi:10.2307/40001152. ISSN 0065-9991. JSTOR 40001152.
  265. ^ Bennett, Chris (2006). "Genealogy and the Chronology of the Second Intermediate Period". Ägypten und Levante / Egypt and the Levant. 16: 231–243. ISSN 1015-5104. JSTOR 23790286.
  266. ^ a b c Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, pp. 190–191.
  267. ^ Ryholt 1997, pp. 163–166, 264–265.
  268. ^ Wegner, Josef; Cahail, Kevin (2021). King Seneb-Kay's Tomb and the Necropolis of a Lost Dynasty at Abydos. University of Pennsylvania Press. pp. 341–343. ISBN 978-1-949057-10-2.
  269. ^ a b Marcel Marée (2010): A sculpture workshop at Abydos from the late Sixteenth or early Seventeenth Dynasty, in: Marcel Marée (editor): The Second Intermediate period (Thirteenth-Seventeenth Dynasties), Current Research, Future Prospects, Leuven, Paris, Walpole, MA. ISBN 978-90-429-2228-0. p. 247, 268
  270. ^ a b Kings of the Second Intermediate Period. University College London
  271. ^ Beckerath 1997.
  272. ^ "Giant Sarcophagus Leads Penn Museum Team in Egypt To the Tomb of a Previously Unknown Pharaoh" (Press release). Penn Museum. January 2014. Archived from the original on 20 April 2015. Retrieved 16 January 2014.
  273. ^ Schneider, T. (2009). "Das Ende der kurzen Chronologie: Eine kritische Bilanz der Debatte zur absoluten Datierung des Mittleren Reiches und der Zweiten Zwischenzeit". Ägypten und Levante. 18: 275–314. doi:10.1553/aeundl18s275. ISSN 1015-5104.
  274. ^ Clayton 2001, p. 37.
  275. ^ Beckerath 1999, pp. 124–131.
  276. ^ a b c d e f g h Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, pp. 181–192.
  277. ^ a b Beckerath 1999, p. 286.
  278. ^ Marée, Marcel (2010). "A sculpture workshop at Abydos from the late Sixteenth or early Seventeenth Dynasty." The Second Intermediate period (Thirteenth-Seventeenth Dynasties), Current Research, Future Prospects, Leuven. ISBN 978-90-429-2228-0. p. 247, 268
  279. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 333–334.
  280. ^ Ryholt 1997, pp. 270–271.
  281. ^ A Pharaoh Of The Seventeenth Dynasty Identified At Karnak Archived 2012-03-11 at the Wayback Machine CFEETK
  282. ^ Biston-Moulin, Sébastien (2012). « Le roi Sénakht-en-Rê Ahmès de la XVIIe dynastie », ENiM 5, pp. 61–71.
  283. ^ a b Bunson 2002, p. 395.
  284. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 192–193.
  285. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 171.
  286. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, pp. 197–217, 492–493.
  287. ^ Cooney 2018, pp. 103–104.
  288. ^ Dodson & Hiton 2004, pp. 126, 129, 139.
  289. ^ Shaw 2003, pp. 484–485.
  290. ^ a b c d e f g h i Krauss 2007.
  291. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 15–6; Clayton 2001, pp. 97–101.
  292. ^ Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, p. 198.
  293. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 29–30; Clayton 2001, p. 101.
  294. ^ Saleem, Sahar N.; Hawass, Zahi (2021). "Digital Unwrapping of the Mummy of King Amenhotep I (1525–1504 BC) Using CT". Frontiers in Medicine. 8: 2292. doi:10.3389/fmed.2021.778498. ISSN 2296-858X. PMC 8748262. PMID 35028305.
  295. ^ Shaw & Nicholson 1995, p. 28.
  296. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 414–5; Clayton 2001, pp. 101–2.
  297. ^ Hawass, Zahi A.; Saleem, Sahar (2016). Scanning the Pharaohs: CT Imaging of the New Kingdom Royal Mummies. Oxford University Press. pp. 47–51. ISBN 978-977-416-673-0.
  298. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 415; Clayton 2001, p. 102.
  299. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 161–2; Clayton 2001, pp. 104–7.
  300. ^ Cooney 2018, p. 131.
  301. ^ a b Beckerath 1997, p. 189.
  302. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 415–16; Clayton 2001, pp. 415–17, 108–11.
  303. ^ Beckerath 1997, pp. 121, 126.
  304. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 30–1; Clayton 2001, pp. 112–3.
  305. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 415; Clayton 2001, pp. 417–18, 113–4.
  306. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 31; Clayton 2001, pp. 115–9.
  307. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 18–19; Clayton 2001, pp. 120–6.
  308. ^ Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, pp. 197–217.
  309. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 379; Clayton 2001, pp. 126–7.
  310. ^ Dodson & Hiton 2004, pp. 150–151.
  311. ^ Naunton 2018, pp. 167–170, 180–182.
  312. ^ a b Cooney 2018, pp. 194–197.
  313. ^ Naunton 2018, pp. 168–170.
  314. ^ Allen, James P.; The Amarna Succession (2006); in P. Brand (ed.), Causing His Name to Live: Studies in Egyptian Epigraphy and History in Memory of William J. Murnane; Archived from the original Archived 30 May 2013 at the Wayback Machine
  315. ^ Naunton 2018, pp. 187–189.
  316. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 413–4; Clayton 2001, pp. 128–35.
  317. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 61; Clayton 2001, pp. 136–7.
  318. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 170–171; Clayton 2001, pp. 137–9.
  319. ^ a b Weigall, Arthur E. P. Brome (1925). A History of the Pharaohs. Cambridge University Press. pp. 234–238.
  320. ^ Greenberg, Gary (1999). Manetho's Eighteenth Dynasty: Putting the Pieces Back Together.
  321. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 334; Clayton 2001, pp. 140–1.
  322. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 334; Clayton 2001, pp. 367–8.
  323. ^ Lull, José; Navarro-López, Diana (2024). "The reign of Sety I from the absolute chronology. A chronological exercise from oDeM 21". Revista del Instituto de Historia Antigua Oriental 'Dr. Abraham Rosenvasser' (25). doi:10.34096/rihao.n25.16269. ISSN 2683-9660.
  324. ^ a b Demarée, R. J. (2016). Announcement of the Passing of Ramesses II, JEOL 46: 121–125.
  325. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 334–335; Clayton 2001, pp. 146–155.
  326. ^ a b c d Beckerath 1997, pp. 103–108, 190.
  327. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 238, 357; Clayton 2001, pp. 156–8.
  328. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, pp. 212–214.
  329. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 369; Clayton 2001, pp. 158–9.
  330. ^ a b Dodson & Hiton 2004, pp. 178–180.
  331. ^ Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, pp. 212–213.
  332. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 33; Clayton 2001, pp. 158.
  333. ^ Aldred, Cyril (1963). "The Parentage of King Siptah". JEA. 49: 41–48. doi:10.2307/3855698. JSTOR 3855698.
  334. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 375; Clayton 2001, pp. 159.
  335. ^ Wilkinson, Richard H. (2012). Tausret: Forgotten Queen and Pharaoh of Egypt. Oxford University Press. p. 29. ISBN 978-0-19-992315-1.
  336. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 418; Clayton 2001, pp. 159.
  337. ^ Cooney 2018, pp. 238–239.
  338. ^ Shaw 2003, p. 485.
  339. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 367; Clayton 2001, pp. 160.
  340. ^ a b c d e f g h i Bunson 2002, pp. 336–338; Clayton 2001, pp. 161–171.
  341. ^ Demarée, Robert J. (2023). "Two Papyrus Fragments with Historically Relevant Data". Rivista del Museo Egizio. 7. doi:10.29353/rime.2023.5078. Archived from the original on 1 December 2023.
  342. ^ Mladjov, Ian (2017), "The Transition between the Twentieth and Twenty-First Dynasties Revisited," Birmingham Egyptology Journal 5: 1–23.
  343. ^ Kitchen, K. A. (1998). Ramesside Inscriptions, Translated and Annotated Notes and Comments. Vol. 2. Wiley. pp. 381–383. ISBN 978-0-631-18435-5.
  344. ^ a b c Adams, Matthew. (2011). Manetho's 23rd Dynasty and the Legitimization of Kushite Rule over Egypt. Antiguo Oriente. 9.
  345. ^ a b Bunson 2002, p. 107.
  346. ^ Clayton 2001, p. 164.
  347. ^ Shaw 2003, p. 485 (1069–945 BC).
  348. ^ a b c d Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, pp. 218–233, 474–475, 493.
  349. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 377; Clayton 2001, pp. 178–9.
  350. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 28; Clayton 2001, pp. 179–180.
  351. ^ Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, pp. 227–228.
  352. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 312; Clayton 2001, pp. 180–1.
  353. ^ a b c Naunton 2018, p. 244.
  354. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 28; Clayton 2001, p. 181.
  355. ^ Yoyotte, Jean (1976). "« Osorkon fils de Mehytouskhé », un pharaon oublié ?". Bulletin de la Société française d'égyptologie. 77 (1): 39–54. doi:10.3406/bsfe.1976.1584.
  356. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 291; Clayton 2001, p. 181.
  357. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 374; Clayton 2001, p. 181.
  358. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 312; Clayton 2001, p. 181.
  359. ^ a b c d e f g h i Payraudeau 2020, pp. 555–557.
  360. ^ a b Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, pp. 218–233.
  361. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 307; Clayton 2001, pp. 176.
  362. ^ Jansen-Winkeln, Karl (1992). "Das Ende des Neuen Reiches". Zeitschrift für ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde. 119: 22–37. doi:10.11588/propylaeumdok.00002326.
  363. ^ a b Broekman, Gerard P. F. (2012). "The Theban High-Priestly Succession in the First Half of the Twenty-First Dynasty". The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology. 98: 195–209. doi:10.1177/030751331209800111. ISSN 0307-5133. JSTOR 24645010.
  364. ^ Palmer, J.L. (2014). The High Priests of Amun at the End of the Twentieth Dynasty. Birmingham Egyptology Journal 2. pp. 1–22.
  365. ^ Morkot, R., & James, P. (2010). Herihor's Kingship and the High Priest of Amun Piankh. Journal of Egyptian History, 3(2), 231–260. doi:10.1163/187416610X541718
  366. ^ Gregory, S. (2013). Piankh and Herihor: Art, Ostraca, and Accession in Perspective. Birmingham Egyptology Journal 1: 5–18.
  367. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 166; Clayton 2001, pp. 175.
  368. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 307–308; Clayton 2001, pp. 176–7.
  369. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 227; Clayton 2001, p. 178.
  370. ^ a b Bunson 2002, p. 237; Clayton 2001, p. 178.
  371. ^ Dodson & Hiton 2004, p. 207.
  372. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 378; Clayton 2001, p. 178.
  373. ^ a b Bunson 2002, pp. 312; Clayton 2001, p. 178.
  374. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, pp. 234–264, 473–494.
  375. ^ a b c Beckerath 1999, pp. 184–199.
  376. ^ a b c d Shaw 2003, p. 486.
  377. ^ a b Kitchen 2009, p. 588.
  378. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 372–373; Clayton 2001, pp. 181–186.
  379. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 291; Clayton 2001, p. 186.
  380. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 393; Clayton 2001, p. 186.
  381. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 373; Clayton 2001, p. 186.
  382. ^ Effland, Ute; Effland, Andreas (2018). "Umm el-Qaab (Abydos), Ägypten. Untersuchungen zum Osiriskult in Abydos vom Alten Reich bis in die Spätzeit. Die Arbeiten der Jahre 2017 und 2018". E-Forschungsberichte des DAI (in German): 47–51. doi:10.34780/jc7t-cma9. ISSN 2198-7734.
  383. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 291, 373; Clayton 2001, p. 187.
  384. ^ a b Beckerath 1999, pp. 184–191.
  385. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 373; Clayton 2001, p. 188.
  386. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 373; Clayton 2001, p. 189.
  387. ^ a b Bunson 2002, p. 295; Clayton 2001, p. 189.
  388. ^ Mladjov 2021b.
  389. ^ Lloyd 2010, p. xxxviii.
  390. ^ Aston, D. (2009). Takeloth II A King of the Heracleopolitan/Theban 23rd Dynasty Revisited. O. Kaper, R. Demarée and G. Broekman Eds. The Libyan Period in Egypt. Leiden: 1–28.
  391. ^ a b c Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, pp. 234–264.
  392. ^ Payraudeau 2020, pp. 34, 155–161, 162–163, 556.
  393. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 159.
  394. ^ a b Bunson 2002, p. 393; Clayton 2001, p. 187.
  395. ^ a b c Bunson 2002, p. 298.
  396. ^ a b Kaper, Olaf & Demarée, Robert (2005), "A Donation Stela in the Name of Takeloth III from Amheida, Dakhleh Oasis," JEOL 39, pp. 19–37.
  397. ^ Payraudeau 2020, p. 562.
  398. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 348.
  399. ^ Payraudeau 2020, pp. 113–131, 162–163.
  400. ^ Payraudeau 2020, pp. 35, 161–162, 556.
  401. ^ Payraudeau 2020, p. 162.
  402. ^ Payraudeau 2020, pp. 35, 161, 556.
  403. ^ Payraudeau 2020, p. 161.
  404. ^ Kitchen 2009, p. 352 (§ 313).
  405. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 278.
  406. ^ Payraudeau 2020, pp. 35, 150–151, 557.
  407. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 185; Clayton 2001, p. 189.
  408. ^ a b c Payraudeau 2020, pp. 36, 151–155, 210, 536.
  409. ^ a b c d e f g h i Aegyptiaca Book III.
  410. ^ Meffre, Raphaële; Payraudeau, Frédéric (2018). "Enquête épigraphique, stylistique et historique sur les blocs du lac sacré de Mout à Tanis". Bulletin de la Société française d'égyptologie. 199 (1): 128–143. doi:10.3406/bsfe.2018.2767.
  411. ^ Meffre, Raphaële; Payraudeau, Frédéric (2019). "Un nouveau roi à la fin de l'époque libyenne: Pami II". Revue d'Égyptologie. 69: 147–157. doi:10.2143/RE.69.0.3287256.
  412. ^ Payraudeau 2020, pp. 36, 210.
  413. ^ a b Beckerath 1999, p. 287.
  414. ^ a b Kitchen 2009, p. 589.
  415. ^ Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, pp. 234–264. Note that Hornung bases his chronology on an older reconstruction that places Shabaka as Piye's direct successor.
  416. ^ Spalinger, Anthony (1973). "The Year 712 B.C. and its Implications for Egyptian History". Journal of the American Research Center in Egypt. 10: 95–101. doi:10.2307/40001021. ISSN 0065-9991.
  417. ^ Payraudeau 2020, pp. 149, 555.
  418. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 397; Clayton 2001, p. 189.
  419. ^ Kitchen 2009, pp. 138–141 (§ 112).
  420. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 64.
  421. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 307; Clayton 2001, pp. 190–192.
  422. ^ a b Payraudeau, F. (2014) "Retour sur la succession Shabaqo—Shabataqo." NeHeT 1: 115–127.
  423. ^ a b Jurman, C. (2017). The Order of the Kushite Kings According to Sources from the Eastern Desert and Thebes. Or: Shabataka was here first. Journal of Egyptian History 10(2), 124–151.
  424. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 370; Clayton 2001, p. 192.
  425. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 369; Clayton 2001, p. 192.
  426. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 392–393; Clayton 2001, pp. 192–193.
  427. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 395; Clayton 2001, p. 193.
  428. ^ a b Kitchen 2009, p. 145-147 (§ 117).
  429. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 262.
  430. ^ Beckerath 1999, pp. 212–13.
  431. ^ Kitchen 2009, pp. 97–99.
  432. ^ a b c d e f Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, pp. 265–283, 473–495.
  433. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 311–312; Clayton 2001, pp. 194–196.
  434. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 265–266; Clayton 2001, p. 196.
  435. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 312; Clayton 2001, p. 196.
  436. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 44; Clayton 2001, pp. 196–197.
  437. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 24–25; Clayton 2001, p. 197.
  438. ^ Dandamaev 1989, p. 76.
  439. ^ Prášek, Justin Václav (1909). "Über den Anfang des persischen Achämenidenjahres [On the beginning of the Persian Achaemenid year]". In Hilprecht Anniversary Volume. Studies in Assyriology and Archaeology Dedicated to Hermann V. Leipzig. pp. 14–19.
  440. ^ a b Dandamayev, Muhammad A. (1990). "Cambyses II". Encyclopaedia Iranica, Vol. IV, Fasc. 7. pp. 726–729.
  441. ^ a b c Briant, Pierre (2000), "Gaumāta", Encyclopedia Iranica, vol. X, fasc. 3, New York: Routledge, Kegan Paul, pp. 333–335.
  442. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 312; Clayton 2001, p. 197.
  443. ^ Dandamaev 1989, pp. 351–353.
  444. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 79; Clayton 2001, pp. 198–199.
  445. ^ Dandamayev, M. A. (1988), "Bardiya", Encyclopedia Iranica, vol. 3, fasc. 8, Costa Mesa: Mazda, pp. 785–786.
  446. ^ Dandamaev 1989, pp. 83–102.
  447. ^ Beckerath 1999, pp. 220–221, 297; Shaw 2003, p. 487; Bunson 2002, p. 107; Clayton 2001, p. 198; Lloyd 2010, p. xxxix.
  448. ^ Rea, J. R. (1972). "O. Leid. 144 and the Chronology of A. D. 238". Zeitschrift für Papyrologie und Epigraphik. 9: 1–19. JSTOR 20180380.
  449. ^ Dandamaev 1989, p. 179.
  450. ^ a b Bunson 2002, pp. 93–94; Clayton 2001, pp. 199–200.
  451. ^ Bunson 2002; Clayton 2001, p. 200.
  452. ^ Beckerath 1999, pp. 220–247.
  453. ^ Neuffer, Julia (1968-01-01). "The Accession of Artaxerxes I". Andrews University Seminary Studies (AUSS). 6 (1). ISSN 0003-2980.
  454. ^ Beckerath 1999, pp. 220–221, 297; Shaw 2003, p. 487; Bunson 2002, p. 107; Clayton 2001, p. 198; Lloyd 2010, p. xxxix; Mladjov 2021b.
  455. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 55; Clayton 2001, pp. 199–200.
  456. ^ a b Dandamaev 1989, pp. 258–259.
  457. ^ Kaper, Olaf E. (2015). "Petubastis IV in the Dakhla Oasis". In Silverman, Jason M.; Waerzeggers, Caroline (eds.). Political memory in and after the Persian empire (SLB monograph, no. 13). Society of Biblical Literature. pp. 125–149. ISBN 978-0-88414-089-4.
  458. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 179.
  459. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 36; Clayton 2001, p. 202.
  460. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 275; Clayton 2001, p. 202.
  461. ^ a b c Ray, John D. (1986). "Psammuthis and Hakoris". The Journal of Egyptian Archaeology. 72: 149–158. doi:10.1177/030751338607200112. JSTOR 3821486.
  462. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 156, 312. Bunson contradicts himself by first referring to Psammuthes (whom he erroneously calls "Psammetichus") as "the designated son and heir of Nephrites I", but later claims that he "[set] aside the designated heir".
  463. ^ Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, pp. 280, 594. Achoris (Hakor) is first placed as the immediate successor of Nepherites I, but later as the successor of Psammuthis.
  464. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 275.
  465. ^ Beckerath 1999, pp. 283–288, 297; Shaw 2003, pp. 481–488; Bunson 2002, pp. 105–108; Clayton 2001, p. 201; Lloyd 2010, p. xxxix; Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, pp. 490–495; Mladjov 2021b.
  466. ^ Mørkholm, Otto (2001) [1991]. Early Hellenistic Coinage: From the Accession of Alexander to the Peace of Apamea (336-188 B.C.). Cambridge University Press. p. 197. ISBN 0-521-39504-6.
  467. ^ Radner, Karen; Moeller, Nadine; Potts, Daniel T. (2023-04-07). The Oxford History of the Ancient Near East: Volume V. Oxford University Press. pp. 752 (n62). ISBN 978-0-19-068766-3.
  468. ^ Payraudeau 2020, pp. 38–40, 333, 342–344.
  469. ^ a b Bunson 2002, p. 266; Clayton 2001, pp. 203–205.
  470. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 401; Clayton 2001, p. 203.
  471. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 55.
  472. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 46.
  473. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 94.
  474. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 197.
  475. ^ a b Bunson 2002, pp. 20–21; Clayton 2001, pp. 206–207.
  476. ^ Danien, Elin C. (1990). The World of Philip and Alexander. UPenn Museum of Archaeology. pp. 41–61. ISBN 978-0-934718-94-3.
  477. ^ Hornung, Krauss & Warburton 2006, p. 281.
  478. ^ Depuydt, Leo (1997). "The Time of Death of Alexander the Great: 11 June 323 B.C. (−322), ca. 4:00–5:00 PM". Die Welt des Orients. 28: 117–135. ISSN 0043-2547. JSTOR 25683643.
  479. ^ "A contemporary account of the death of Alexander". Livius.org. Retrieved 5 November 2019.
  480. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 306; Clayton 2001, pp. 206–207.
  481. ^ Tolley, Harry (2019). "The End of the Satrapies: The Date of Alexander IV's Death" (PDF). Athens Journal of History. 5 (4): 259–278. doi:10.30958/ajhis.5-4-3.
  482. ^ a b Bennett 2013.
  483. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 314–315; Clayton 2001, pp. 208–210; Bennett 2013, Ptolemy I.
  484. ^ Bennett 2013, Ptolemy I.
  485. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 315; Clayton 2001, p. 210; Bennett 2013, Ptolemy II.
  486. ^ Bennett 2013, Ptolemy "the Son".
  487. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 315–316; Clayton 2001, pp. 210–211; Bennett 2013, Ptolemy III.
  488. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 316; Clayton 2001, p. 211; Bennett 2013, Ptolemy IV.
  489. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 316; Clayton 2001, p. 211; Bennett 2013, Ptolemy V.
  490. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 316–317; Clayton 2001, pp. 211–212; Bennett 2013, Ptolemy VI.
  491. ^ Chauveau, M. (2000). "Encore Ptolémée «VII» et le dieu Neos Philopatôr!," Revue d'Égyptologie 51: 257–261.
  492. ^ Bennett 2013, Ptolemy Memphites.
  493. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 317; Clayton 2001, pp. 213–214; Bennett 2013, Ptolemy VIII.
  494. ^ Bennett 2013, Cleopatra II.
  495. ^ Bennett 2013, Ptolemy Eupator.
  496. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 83; Clayton 2001, pp. 213–214; Bennett 2013, Cleopatra III.
  497. ^ a b Bunson 2002, pp. 83–84; Clayton 2001, pp. 213–214; Bennett 2013, Cleopatra III.
  498. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 317; Clayton 2001, p. 214; Bennett 2013, Ptolemy IX.
  499. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 317; Clayton 2001, p. 214; Bennett 2013, Ptolemy X.
  500. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 69–70; Clayton 2001, pp. 214–215; Bennett 2013, Berenice III.
  501. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 314–318; Clayton 2001, pp. 209–217; Bennett 2013, Ptolemy XI.
  502. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 318; Clayton 2001, p. 215; Bennett 2013, Ptolemy XII.
  503. ^ a b Bunson 2002, p. 84; Bennett 2013, Cleopatra V.
  504. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 70; Clayton 2001, p. 215; Bennett 2013, Berenice IV.
  505. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 84–85; Clayton 2001, pp. 216–217; Bennett 2013, Cleopatra VII.
  506. ^ Bennett 2013, Ptolemy XII.
  507. ^ Skeat, T. C. (1953). "The Last Days of Cleopatra: A Chronological Problem". The Journal of Roman Studies. 43 (1–2): 98–100. doi:10.2307/297786. ISSN 0075-4358. JSTOR 297786. S2CID 162835002.
  508. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 318; Bennett 2013, Ptolemy XIII.
  509. ^ Bunson 2002, pp. 46–47; Bennett 2013, Arsinoe IV; Cleopatra VII.
  510. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 318; Bennett 2013, Ptolemy XIV.
  511. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 318; Clayton 2001, pp. 216–217; Bennett 2013, Berenice IV.
  512. ^ a b Bunson 2002, pp. 40, 173; Bennett 2013, Horwennefer / Ankhwennefer.
  513. ^ Bennett 2013, Harsiesi.
  514. ^ Ashton, Sally-Ann (2014). The Last Queens of Egypt: Cleopatra's Royal House. Routledge. pp. 112–113. ISBN 978-1-317-86873-6.
  515. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 46; Bennett 2013, Arsinoe II.
  516. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 69; Bennett 2013, Brenice II.
  517. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 46; Bennett 2013, Arsinoe III.
  518. ^ Bunson 2002, p. 83; Bennett 2013, Cleopatra I.
  519. ^ Sewell-Lasater, Tara (2020). "Becoming Kleopatra: Ptolemaic Royal Marriage, Incest, and the Path to Female Rule". University of Houston: 16–17, 245–246.
  520. ^ Burstein, Stanley Mayer (2007). The Reign of Cleopatra. University of Oklahoma Press. p. 12. ISBN 978-0-8061-3871-8.
  521. ^ Ritner, Robert K. (1998). "Egypt under Roman rule: the legacy of Ancient Egypt" (PDF). In Petry, Carl F. (ed.). The Cambridge History of Egypt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 1–33. ISBN 0-521-47137-0.

Bibliography

[edit]

Online resources

This article is sourced from Wikipedia. Content is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License.