Draft:Maya van Rossum

Review waiting, please be patient. This may take 5 weeks or more, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 2,232 pending submissions waiting for review. If the submission is accepted, then this page will be moved into the article space. If the submission is declined, then the reason will be posted here. In the meantime, you can continue to improve this submission by editing normally. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Reviewer tools Instructions · What links here · Maya van Rossum (talk: + · bio) · (log) · Copyvios report · reFill · Citation Bot · (Search: Google, Wikipedia) · Submitted 15 hours ago by ArticleArchivist118 (talk: D · +) · Last edited 15 hours ago by ArticleArchivist118

Submission declined on 6 February 2026 by OrangeWaylon (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window. If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted. If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted. Where to get help If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews. If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed. How to improve a draft Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia. Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Add tags to your draft Editor resources Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs Declined by OrangeWaylon 6 days ago. Last edited by ArticleArchivist118 15 hours ago. Reviewer: Inform author. This draft has been resubmitted and is currently awaiting re-review.

Maya K. van Rossum is an American environmental advocate and attorney who serves as the longtime Delaware Riverkeeper and is the founder of the national Green Amendments movement. As leader of the Delaware Riverkeeper Network, she has been involved in regional watershed protection, environmental litigation, and community advocacy across the Delaware River Basin. Van Rossum has been profiled in regional and national media for her long‑running environmental advocacy, with coverage highlighting her decades as the Delaware Riverkeeper and her influence on state‑level debates over environmental rights.[1][2]Van Rossum was a lead petitioner in the 2013 Pennsylvania Supreme Court case Robinson Township v. Commonwealth, which revived the state’s Environmental Rights Amendment and helped inspire her subsequent work promoting state-level constitutional environmental rights. She later founded Green Amendments for the Generations to advance similar constitutional protections nationwide and is the author of two books on environmental rights.

In interviews, van Rossum has explained that the movement grew directly out of the legal victory in Robinson Township, which she described as demonstrating the “transformative power” of constitutional environmental rights.[3] She has since worked with communities and lawmakers across the country to develop amendment language and support campaigns in more than a dozen states.

A 2023 feature in Green Matters highlighted her framing of Green Amendments as a tool for addressing both environmental degradation and environmental injustice by elevating environmental rights to the same constitutional status as other civil liberties.[4]

Van Rossum has served as the Delaware Riverkeeper, the chief advocacy and leadership role within the Delaware Riverkeeper Network (DRN), for more than two decades. In this capacity, she leads the organization’s efforts to protect and restore the Delaware River and its tributaries through legal action, scientific review, community engagement, and policy advocacy. Her work with DRN has included challenging industrial pollution, opposing environmentally harmful infrastructure projects, and supporting local communities affected by water quality and watershed impacts.[5]

Independent reporting has described van Rossum as a prominent advocate whose litigation‑focused approach has shaped environmental oversight in the Delaware River watershed. A profile in The Philadelphia Inquirer noted that under her leadership, the Delaware Riverkeeper Network expanded its legal actions significantly during the early 2000s and 2010s, reflecting her emphasis on using the courts to enforce environmental protections.[6]

Coverage from WHYY marking her 25 years in the role highlighted her hands‑on approach to monitoring the river, testifying before government bodies, and mobilizing community members in response to environmental threats.[7]

As Delaware Riverkeeper, van Rossum has overseen litigation and regulatory interventions on issues such as natural gas development, pipeline construction, stormwater management, and aquatic habitat protection. DRN’s press archives document her involvement in regional and state-level environmental disputes, public education efforts, and campaigns aimed at strengthening environmental oversight across the watershed.[8] Her leadership in this role has positioned her as a prominent regional environmental advocate and provided the foundation for her later work promoting constitutional environmental rights.

In 2013, van Rossum served as a lead petitioner in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court case Robinson Township v. Commonwealth, brought by the Delaware Riverkeeper Network and several municipalities in response to provisions of Act 13 governing natural gas development. The Court’s decision revived Pennsylvania’s long‑dormant Environmental Rights Amendment, affirming that the state constitution protects the people’s rights to clean air, pure water, and a healthy environment.[9]

Independent analyses have described the ruling as a landmark moment in state‑level environmental constitutionalism, expanding the enforceability of Pennsylvania’s environmental rights provisions and reshaping the legal framework for environmental oversight.[10] The case also played a central role in shaping van Rossum’s later advocacy. According to legal reporting, the decision demonstrated the potential power of constitutional environmental rights and helped inspire her to promote similar amendments in other states.[11]

Following the 2013 Robinson Township decision, van Rossum began promoting the idea that state constitutions should explicitly protect environmental rights. She founded Green Amendments for the Generations to advance this approach and to support campaigns for constitutional environmental rights in states across the country.[12]

Independent reporting identifies the Green Amendments movement as part of a broader national effort to embed environmental rights in state constitutions, with supporters viewing these amendments as a way to strengthen legal tools available to communities affected by pollution[13][14]

Coverage has also examined the legal and political implications of the movement, noting that advocates see constitutional environmental rights as a response to gaps in federal environmental law and that state‑level debates have focused on the scope and enforceability of proposed amendments.[15][16][17]

Van Rossum is the author of two books on environmental constitutionalism and the Green Amendments movement. Her first book, The Green Amendment: Securing Our Right to a Healthy Environment (2017), outlines the legal and philosophical foundations of constitutional environmental rights and describes the origins of the movement following the Robinson Township decision.[18]

She later published an expanded and updated version, The Green Amendment: The People’s Fight for a Clean, Safe, and Healthy Environment (2022), which examines state-level campaigns, legal developments, and the broader national effort to advance environmental rights amendments.[19]

A 2024 profile in Inside Climate News described van Rossum as “one of the most effective advocates in the country,” noting her willingness to confront policymakers directly and her long record of challenging industrial and governmental decisions affecting the Delaware River.[20] The article also emphasized her influence on state‑level environmental policy debates and her role in advancing constitutional environmental rights in states such as New York.

Environmental leaders interviewed in the same piece credited her with preventing significant industrial development along the Delaware River through sustained advocacy and litigation.[21]

Van Rossum’s advocacy has been featured in national and regional media, including environmental policy podcasts and public radio programs, where commentators have highlighted her role in shaping contemporary discussions of constitutional environmental rights. In an interview on the environmental podcast Earthbound, van Rossum described how Green Amendments have produced “a series of really effective outcomes” in states such as Pennsylvania and Montana, including litigation victories, cleanup of long‑ignored toxic sites, and protections for vulnerable ecosystems.[22]

Media profiles have portrayed van Rossum as a persistent and outspoken advocate whose work spans litigation, public education, and grassroots organizing. Green Matters characterized her as an “environmental justice warrior” and highlighted her efforts to address threats such as fossil fuel infrastructure, dredging projects, and declining water quality in the Delaware River.[23]

Additional commentary has examined the broader legal and political context in which van Rossum’s advocacy operates. In a 2025 opinion article for Common Dreams, van Rossum argued that recent deregulatory efforts at the federal and state levels have weakened traditional environmental protections, framing constitutional environmental rights as a necessary safeguard for public health and natural resources.[24]

Coverage from outlets such as The Allegheny Front, Sierra Club, and Ms. Magazine situates van Rossum within a growing national movement to embed environmental rights in state constitutions, noting that supporters view these amendments as a way to strengthen legal protections for communities affected by pollution.[25][26][27]

Regional coverage has also documented the influence of van Rossum’s work on state policy debates, including legislative discussions in states such as Rhode Island, where lawmakers and advocates have cited the movement’s legal framework in debates over environmental oversight and constitutional protections.[28][29]

Public discussions of the Green Amendments movement have also highlighted critiques raised by policymakers, industry representatives, and legal commentators. In her Earthbound interview, van Rossum noted that some opponents argue that constitutional environmental rights could lead to increased litigation or create uncertainty for regulatory agencies, though she disputed these claims and compared such concerns to debates surrounding other broad constitutional protections.[30]

She has also responded to critiques in her published commentary, arguing that concerns about litigation or regulatory burdens mirror debates surrounding other constitutional rights and do not reflect how existing amendments have been applied in practice.[31]

Independent reporting has documented similar critiques, including arguments that Green Amendments may impose new obligations on state agencies or complicate permitting decisions, and that some policymakers question whether constitutional amendments are the most effective mechanism for addressing environmental concerns.[32][33][34]

• Green Amendments for the Generations
• Delaware Riverkeeper Network